Stoner Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 And Stafford was sitting, too. As Was McArthur, who has been playing well lately. Just saying, it looked really strange when you season was on the line and the goal scorers were sitting. What does it say about their worth, or Ruff's decison making. Something was wrong here What do you think Golisano thought of the scene, if he was even watching?
X. Benedict Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 And Stafford was sitting, too. As Was McArthur, who has been playing well lately. Just saying, it looked really strange when you season was on the line and the goal scorers were sitting. What does it say about their worth, or Ruff's decison making. Something was wrong here Not sure if it is correct, but this was my perception.....tons of guys getting kicked out of the faceoff circle last night...I think Pomminstein might of had 8 or 9 draws. Putting Guastad, Moore, and Mair, Roy, and Connolly out there has its own logic....can't win without the puck as we saw the previous game. All can center and wing. edit: okay, just checked...Pomminstein took 7 draws...Connolly O......beats me.
carpandean Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 Not sure if it is correct, but this was my perception.....tons of guys getting kicked out of the faceoff circlelast night...I think Pomminstein might of had 8 or 9 draws. Putting Guastad, Moore, and Mair, Roy, and Connolly out there has its own logic....can't win without the puck as we saw the previous game. All can center and wing. Pominville won 3 of 7. Lindy said something about Timmy having a problem and having someone else take draws (he took none last night.)
wonderbread Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 What do you think Golisano thought of the scene, if he was even watching? He was to busy counting his money.
X. Benedict Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 Pominville won 3 of 7. Lindy said something about Timmy having a problem and having someone else take draws (he took none last night.) Thanks, missed that. I just figured Pomminstein was taking them because people were getting booted.
bob_sauve28 Posted April 7, 2009 Author Report Posted April 7, 2009 What do you think Golisano thought of the scene, if he was even watching? My theory--just a theory--is that he could care less about the team and has just left his three guys in charge and they are basically running the show for better or for worse. And I'd say for worse right now. It seems like we have an absentee landlord that doesn't want to fix the leaky plumbing.
bob_sauve28 Posted April 7, 2009 Author Report Posted April 7, 2009 Not sure if it is correct, but this was my perception.....tons of guys getting kicked out of the faceoff circlelast night...I think Pomminstein might of had 8 or 9 draws. Putting Guastad, Moore, and Mair, Roy, and Connolly out there has its own logic....can't win without the puck as we saw the previous game. All can center and wing. edit: okay, just checked...Pomminstein took 7 draws...Connolly O......beats me. Oh my mistake then, I though Paille was out there, not Moore. That makes a little more sense
bottlecap Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 Exactly. I hear that complaint so much, and its such bigoted crap. you Euro-Pussies are sensitive, aren't you?
VansTheMans Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 My theory--just a theory--is that he could care less about the team and has just left his three guys in charge and they are basically running the show for better or for worse. And I'd say for worse right now. It seems like we have an absentee landlord that doesn't want to fix the leaky plumbing. Quote of the day.
SwampD Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 you Euro-Pussies are sensitive, aren't you? :lol:
jlombard1999 Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 I watched the game twice(once last night and again this morning...just wanted to see how far this team has fallen off or need to punish myself for still watching the games, you decide. I think it is easy to constantly blame TV but the golden line last night had many turnovers that should have led to goals. Also our useless and emotionally unstable and no confidence D gave away many pucks. Really this team has a serious lack of IDENTITY...a bunch of offensively gifted player forced to play a system they have never been asked too. Please tell me the last time any of our top 10 forwards played a defense first mentality. Timmy and TV have been more the first forward back most of the season MAYBE JUST MAYBE THE COACH HAS LOST THIS TEAM........... Just my opinion but what the hell do I know
carpandean Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 Timmy and TV have been more the first forward back most of the season Odd, since he only played half of it. :nana:
VansTheMans Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 Lol. Thats interesting though, because that's what I asked in my thread, "Heads Should Roll?". If Ruff tried a play style the team was more comfortable with, would we have seen better, consistent results? Or would a open style, offensive minded game result in certain death in the current NHL?
Stoner Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 Lol. Thats interesting though, because that's what I asked in my thread, "Heads Should Roll?". If Ruff tried a play style the team was more comfortable with, would we have seen better, consistent results? Or would a open style, offensive minded game result in certain death in the current NHL? Today, when asked what his team's identity was (not necessarily system), Lindy said the Sabres play an up tempo, puck pressure style.
billsrcursed Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 What do you think Golisano thought of the scene, if he was even watching? He was trying to decide which tastes better on a microphone, Mayo or mustard - <_<
Mbossy Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 What do you think Golisano thought of the scene, if he was even watching? Golisano has been a no show for quite some time. He didn't even make the team picture the other day. Guess he doesn't want to be on the side of that milk carton.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.