wjag Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Buffalo PP That was absolutely gorgeous... Stafford from Roy Buffalo: :worthy: :worthy: Ottawa: :censored: :censored:
ThePebble19 Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Drew Stafford is becoming a man. He is playing top notch right now.
SabreInFla Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Did I ever say anything about someone replacing Vanek? No, I did not. You have no argument, stop resorting to putting words in my mouth. Did I say they wouldn't miss Vanek? No. I said nothing that's happened so far would throw them "off the rails". Allright JuJu.....I will retract my off the rails comment. Didn't mean to start an argument with it.
wjag Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Amazing game hockey is... This team was all but dead... And now we're in a position for one and maybe two..
FogBat Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Drew Stafford is becoming a man. He is playing top notch right now. Note to Darcy: Do not trade away Stafford under any circumstances. Do we make ourselves clear?
JujuFish Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Allright JuJu.....I will retract my off the rails comment. Didn't mean to start an argument with it. It wasn't the comment that started the argument. I just gave my opinion at first. It was Jack that started arguing. You did nothing wrong, and I can't say I didn't start to worry just a tad when Vanek got hit. Stafford tying the game certainly lightens the mood right now. :thumbsup:
thesportsbuff Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Did I ever say anything about someone replacing Vanek? No, I did not. You have no argument, stop resorting to putting words in my mouth. Did I say they wouldn't miss Vanek? No. I said nothing that's happened so far would throw them "off the rails". The same Vanek who's scored in three of the last 13 games? Somehow I doubt that's going to throw the Sabres "off the rails". Oh my bad, you telling me that Vanek sucks must have given me the impression that you think losing him wouldn't hurt the team. internet is serious business man
FogBat Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Chris Neil is gone for the night due to a knee injury.
ThePebble19 Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Note to Darcy: Do not trade away Stafford under any circumstances. Do we make ourselves clear? This just in...Stafford has been traded. Dammit! :lol: :doh:
ROC Sabres Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Note to Darcy: Do not trade away Stafford under any circumstances. Do we make ourselves clear? You probably gave him incentive to trade him since we want him.
repster Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Caps just scored an empty netter to go ahead of the Panthers with just over a minute left and Leafs extend lead to 3-1. Hope things keep moving in the right direction.
sabresnutinphoenix Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Chris Neil is gone for the night due to a knee injury. I am feeling real bad...NOT!!
FogBat Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 This just in...Stafford has been traded. Dammit! :lol: :doh: :lol:
JujuFish Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Oh my bad, you telling me that Vanek sucks must have given me the impression that you think losing him wouldn't hurt the team. internet is serious business man There go you go putting more words in my mouth. I never said Vanek sucks, and I never said losing him wouldn't hurt the team. Since you seem to be either doing your best impersonation of a politician, or have a rather difficult time with reading comprehension, there is no reason to continue arguing with you. Run along now.
repster Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 How about a powerplay to tie it up? We haven't had one yet tonight. My next request is for at least one point.
thesportsbuff Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Is the Pizza line ever not on the ice? put simply: no :D
wjag Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 5:43 left.. Need one more good shift in their zone to seal the deal.. Time for Pomminstein... He is soooooo due... Or Hecht...
FogBat Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Imagine this: if we win tonight, we will be tied in the points standings with the Rangers and Flyers and one point behind the Habs if the Leafs win tonight.
repster Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Imagine this: if we win tonight, we will be tied in the points standings with the Rangers and Flyers and one point behind the Habs if the Leafs win tonight. ...and Leafs just scored to make it 4-1
ThePebble19 Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 Another goal right now would be nice...No overtime, just another Sabres goal.
thesportsbuff Posted February 8, 2009 Report Posted February 8, 2009 There go you go putting more words in my mouth. I never said Vanek sucks, and I never said losing him wouldn't hurt the team. Since you seem to be either doing your best impersonation of a politician, or have a rather difficult time with reading comprehension, there is no reason to continue arguing with you. Run along now. Do you forget what you post thirty seconds after you post it? The same Vanek who's scored in three of the last 13 games? Somehow I doubt that's going to throw the Sabres "off the rails". have a good night man!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.