Crestwood Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Unbelievable. And yet, because it's Crosby, quite believable.
matter2003 Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 that was BS, it was so obvious that the stick was above the bar....of course it had to be Crosby hitting it, so we don't get the call.... On a more irritating note...what is this teams problem with holding a 1 goal 3rd period lead?
Crestwood Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 P.S. Where the hell are the ice-level camera views?
Foligno's Nose Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 High stick from my veiw. I mean view. Screw job! ROC Sabres was right. Merry Christmas everyone...except Sid.
Knightrider Posted December 23, 2008 Author Report Posted December 23, 2008 Looked like a high stick to me, too... They did come away with 4 out 6 points over the last four nights.
McJeff215 Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 That was clearly over the crossbar. But first goal in 10 games and have it be the OT winner? Can't pass that up. All of that said, we need to show up when we're a man up. Our PP isn't as atrocious as last year (SHG, anyone?), but there were too many chances that we didn't do sh*t on.
bottlecap Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 I like the way we've been playing lately, generally but... We. Can't. Hold. A. Lead.
McJeff215 Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 I mean view.Screw job! ROC Sabres was right. Merry Christmas everyone...except Sid. Yeah, screw him! :thumbsup:
RayFinkle Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 High stick from anyone points of view, but it's sidney, come on, like we'd get that call. Unbelievable. And yet, because it's Crosby, quite believable. that was BS, it was so obvious that the stick was above the bar....of course it had to be Crosby hitting it, so we don't get the call.... On a more irritating note...what is this teams problem with holding a 1 goal 3rd period lead? That about sums it up...
carpandean Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 He was up on his toes (as much as you can do that on skates) and the blade was on level with his shoulders. How the f**k is that not above the crossbar? It's not like he's Nathan Gerbe! Screw that! Even if he were Nathan Gerbe in that same position his blade would have been above the crossbar.
Foligno's Nose Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Another damn loss at home too. The point is some consolation, just like Saturday. Earning points the way we have been is positive. We will climb into a seed this way, but it will go down to the wire. Now where's that 'Sabrekillers' thread?
bob_sauve28 Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 That was a terrible call. And their goaltender outplayed our goaltender
RR61 Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 That call was just another example of why the officiating is a joke in this league. A bleeping joke. There's one set of rules for everyone and another for their anointed star. I am completely disgusted.
Stoner Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 I hate to do this, with my reputation as contrarian and all. But I call em like I em. That was too close to call. From the overhead angle, it's just not obvious enough. For those who say it was clearly this or that, it's just your emotions talking. Story of the night: Vanek has chance after chance and can't score, ends up -3. Crosby is invisible, gets one chance and wins the game. There's the difference between very good and great players. Fleury was outstanding. Miller was Miller. It's been almost one calendar year of this torture, going back to the Winter Classic. It's almost as worn out as my schtick.
tom webster Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Looked like a high stick to me, too... They did come away with 4 out 6 points over the last four nights. And they gave up a chance to make up ground on two teams they are trying to catch, bad calls or not
el_Polako Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Nothing like losing on the 'Sid the kid' rule <_<
bob_sauve28 Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 I hate to do this, with my reputation as contrarian and all. But I call em like I em. That was too close to call. From the overhead angle, it's just not obvious enough. For those who say it was clearly this or that, it's just your emotions talking. Story of the night: Vanek has chance after chance and can't score, ends up -3. Crosby is invisible, gets one chance and wins the game. There's the difference between very good and great players. Fleury was outstanding. Miller was Miller. It's been almost one calendar year of this torture, going back to the Winter Classic. It's almost as worn out as my schtick. I agree with most of what you say, but Vanek getting the chances is just good. When he isn't getting chance that's the time to criticize
LabattBlue Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 You want to be pissed at someone? How about that giant Tallinder who instead of knocking down the floater actually ducked out of the way....game over. WTF was he thinking? Blow a 2-0 lead early and a 3-2 lead going into the 3rd...another great home game! <_<
thesportsbuff Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 hey another crosby circle jerk for the men in stripes, anybody else not surprised???
TheMadCap Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 I think I hate Evgeni Mongoloid more than Crosby, but it's really, really close...
Stoner Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 I agree with most of what you say, but Vanek getting the chances is just good. When he isn't getting chance that's the time to criticize It's not about chances.
SDS Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 I hate to do this, with my reputation as contrarian and all. But I call em like I em. That was too close to call. From the overhead angle, it's just not obvious enough. For those who say it was clearly this or that, it's just your emotions talking. Among my great many talents, perspective/depth perception is at the top of the list. There is no way on God's green Earth that was a goal. Not even close. I'm saying 8.6 inches +/- 0.1 inches over the bar.
Stoner Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Among my great many talents, perspective/depth perception is at the top of the list. There is no way on God's green Earth that was a goal. Not even close. I'm saying 8.6 inches +/- 0.1 inches over the bar. That's what she said?
thesportsbuff Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Among my great many talents, perspective/depth perception is at the top of the list. There is no way on God's green Earth that was a goal. Not even close. I'm saying 8.6 inches +/- 0.1 inches over the bar. lol i agree it was definitely high but i donno about 8 + inches B-)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.