inkman Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 Doh! sabre1.BMP sabre2.BMP sabre3.BMP sabre4.BMP sabre5.BMP
Knightrider Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 Looking at those, I think I have decided I like the slug better than the goathead.
Two or less Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 #4. The goathead and it doesn't even look that good.
Ohiofan Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 Well, I would think that the first one would be the most regrettable. It includes the words "Buffalo Sabres", which associates the tat with a team. The other four could represent other things...being from buffalo...or the power of the letter B.
Bmwolf21 Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 Until 1996 the original crest would have been a safe bet. Now that we've had two new logos in the last 10-12 years and may be going back to an updated version of the original logo again, I think I'd be a little hesitant about getting a logo tattoo.
spndnchz Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 #1 - better head, but too dark #2 - the best of the five, I guess? #3 - bad artwork especially swords #4 - is that a ram eating a napkin? #5 - not clear enough pic to comment
jwcolour Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 I don't think 4 is that bad... in the sense that it doesn't even look like the logo and might not even be associated with the team... could pass it off as the guy just got a badass tatoo of a Ram.
theesir Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 The other four could represent other things...being from buffalo...or the power of the letter B. :lol: Todays episode of Sesame Street brought to you by the letter B
jimiVbaby Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 All of the above. Something tells me these we inked around the same time... let's say March/April 1999.
Claude Balls Posted October 16, 2008 Report Posted October 16, 2008 What the hell Ink, you didn't even add mine? I don't regret it.....yet.
inkman Posted October 16, 2008 Author Report Posted October 16, 2008 What the hell Ink, you didn't even add mine? I don't regret it.....yet. I'll be looking for Shatanic Goatheads in Pittsford. Can't be too many!
Claude Balls Posted October 16, 2008 Report Posted October 16, 2008 I'll be looking for Shatanic Goatheads in Pittsford. Can't be too many! There ain't too many people with tattoos in Pittsford period. I am the anti-christ in this town. Damn yuppy bastardios. WTF happened to the devil emoticon.
Doohicksie Posted October 16, 2008 Report Posted October 16, 2008 This is why tattoos are ALWAYS a bad idea!
Claude Balls Posted October 16, 2008 Report Posted October 16, 2008 This is why tattoos are ALWAYS a bad idea! Someone should have told this cracker that.
carpandean Posted October 16, 2008 Report Posted October 16, 2008 Until 1996 the original crest would have been a safe bet. Now that we've had two new logos in the last 10-12 years and may be going back to an updated version of the original logo again, I think I'd be a little hesitant about getting a logo tattoo. The original logo will always be a safe bet, because ... well ... it's the original.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.