tom webster Posted March 18, 2008 Author Report Posted March 18, 2008 It says that I'm too lazy to bother looking through numbers and that I have no reason to try to get tickets when I live somewhere else. I took into account that a lot of posters are out of town. I wonder what the breakdown is on that.
tom webster Posted March 18, 2008 Author Report Posted March 18, 2008 Occam's razor you realize quoting principals of logic could bring you great scorn
R_Dudley Posted March 18, 2008 Report Posted March 18, 2008 Occam's razor Wow today is another great day because I learned something.. :D . Some much to learn so little time :rolleyes:
tom webster Posted March 18, 2008 Author Report Posted March 18, 2008 Thank you for participating. While I like the thought of going after a Langkow and a Orpik, I see the likelihood of them standing pat. I aslo found it interesting that all parties expected them to stay well below the projected $56 million cap for 08-09. Inkman even had them flirting with the floor at just over $41 million although he didn't include Max. While our favorite posts was Blue's, we thought his long term deals for Goose and Oaille were too low of a cap number, but not by much. We thought that Carp's and Ink's one year numbers were a tad low also. Finally, we took the easy way out. We went with Carp's because, Blue wasn't interested in the tickets Ink forgot to include Max. I must say, I would enjoy a game and a beer with all of you.
LabattBlue Posted March 18, 2008 Report Posted March 18, 2008 While our favorite posts was Blue's... Thought the competition was limited, I appreciate the accolades! :) :)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.