Sweet Baboo Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 i only want to see the fight if peters doesn't turn around and let tucker take free shots at the back of his head
SabreInFla Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 The Leafs are out to hurt somebody........we better watch out. The crowd response was disgusting when the Leafs scored, any "fans" that sold their tickets should be ashamed.
MichFan Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 it is both ways so far this game guys - while I am glad that somebody finally hit a Leaf, that should have been a penalty on Mair. Mair came in shoulder first and raised up. O'Neal was the one who led with the elbow just prior to Mair's hit.
DWarner Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 The Leafs announcer said it was a "flying elbow." Then he saw the replay from another angle and said, "oh." That's it. Not "oh, it was a clean hit." Plus, he keeps saying Patch!! Ugh.
mrjsbu96 Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 Mair came in shoulder first and raised up. O'Neal was the one who led with the elbow just prior to Mair's hit. there was nothing wrong with how he hit him, but o'neal didn't have the puck. that's interference.
Rock DJ Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 When is Peters gonna take-on Tucker? Tucker won't fight him. He's an instigator, but he'll never drop gloves against a "tough guy"
Bmwolf21 Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 Mair's hit should not have been a penalty (puck was in his skates in the scrum) but O'Neill's elbow should have; the Tucker call was obvious to everyone, including the Laffs fans; and the Zubrus call was weak at best.
Rock DJ Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 there was nothing wrong with how he hit him, but o'neal didn't have the puck. that's interference. O'Neal was in a fight for the puck. Just cause it wasn't on his stick doesn't mean he was involved in the play. You say Mair's hit was a penalty, saying it was on par with Tucker hog tying Kalinin? :doh:
darksabre Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 someone has to take down tucker, i don't care if it's derek roy, someone has to lay him out. i hate him so much. lol
Rock DJ Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 someone has to take down tucker, i don't care if it's derek roy, someone has to lay him out. i hate him so much. lol :beer: :beer: :beer:
MichFan Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 there was nothing wrong with how he hit him, but o'neal didn't have the puck. that's interference. Keep fishing, eventually you'll find some reason why Mair shoulda got a penalty. Meanwhile I'll go with the Toronto announcers who backed off on that one themselves. Strange how they replayed that hit several times until they realized they were sunk, but never replayed Tuckers horsecollar once.
mrjsbu96 Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 next person that complains about a no-call against the sabres remember that atrocious hooking call that antropnov jsut got on campbell.. Keep fishing, eventually you'll find some reason why Mair shoulda got a penalty. Meanwhile I'll go with the Toronto announcers who backed off on that one themselves. Strange how they replayed that hit several times until they realized they were sunk, but never replayed Tuckers horsecollar once. it's not fishing. as i said, i love mair and it was about time somebody hit someone, but even RJ and Lorentz said there probably should ahve been a call...
MichFan Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 next person that complains about a no-call against the sabres remember that atrocious hooking call that antropnov jsut got on campbell.. it's not fishing. as i said, i love mair and it was about time somebody hit someone, but even RJ and Lorentz said there probably should ahve been a call... :wallbash:
Rock DJ Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 This is just butt ugly. It's like no one wants the puck.
mrjsbu96 Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 ok, i'm done with michfan, but maybe we can agree on the brunette in the red behind the TOR net? i noticed her in the first period too, but couldn't get a headshot...
Bmwolf21 Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 it's not fishing. as i said, i love mair and it was about time somebody hit someone, but even RJ and Lorentz said there probably should ahve been a call... I'll have to rewind the DVR, because I didn't hear them say that.... BTW, a big :thumbsup: to the Sabres - almost 20:00 between SOG? Great effort... <_<
darksabre Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 i like how our passing just kinda...died
Rabbit151 Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 Great effort by the Sabres!! Hooray!! We're ready for the play-offs.
Bmwolf21 Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 I was going to post a list of guys I think are dogging it tonight, but I think the list of guys who have shown up will be easier - so far, I have Miller and Roy...anyone else?
Rock DJ Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 I was going to post a list of guys I think are dogging it tonight, but I think the list of guys who have shown up will be easier - so far, I have Miller and Roy...anyone else? Dare I say... Kalinin has really beem hustling again tonite, along with some good defensive plays deep.
Sabretooth73 Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 why the F are we getting outshot by nearly double to a very average at best team, in our own bulding to boot? WTF! oh, by the way, F $hittsburgh! last nite pitt lost in the sweet 16 and the pens lost, a very, very good nite!
darksabre Posted March 24, 2007 Report Posted March 24, 2007 WTF is with this officiating? what officiating, there's officials? I don't even see them. Of course I don't see our team either, they're absent from the game. That was a weak period.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.