gilbert1175 Posted February 21, 2007 Report Posted February 21, 2007 I'm guessing this isn't about an impending Biron trade, but rather about getting another body into Rochester - just thought I'd pass along... http://www.echl.com/cgi-bin/mpublic.cgi?ac...&cat=1&id=10129
inkman Posted February 21, 2007 Report Posted February 21, 2007 I'm guessing this isn't about an impending Biron trade, but rather about getting another body into Rochester - just thought I'd pass along... http://www.echl.com/cgi-bin/mpublic.cgi?ac...&cat=1&id=10129 ...and the fact that their starting goalie Craig Anderson, Panthers property, was recalled the day before.
shrader Posted February 21, 2007 Report Posted February 21, 2007 ...and the fact that their starting goalie Craig Anderson, Panthers property, was recalled the day before. Who needs two goalies? :rolleyes:
FogBat Posted February 22, 2007 Report Posted February 22, 2007 ...and the fact that their starting goalie Craig Anderson, Panthers property, was recalled the day before. The Panthers need their own farm team instead of tapping into Rochester. Then again, rumor has it that the Panthers may be on the move if they can't get financially stable (and the same goes for Nashville). For all we know, they may move to the other side of the border.
Orange Seats Posted February 22, 2007 Report Posted February 22, 2007 The Panthers need their own farm team instead of tapping into Rochester. If I remember correctly, the Sabres #%^$#!ed around renewing their deal with Rochester and that's how Florida ended up with half a stake in the team. Anyone rememebr the details?
inkman Posted February 22, 2007 Report Posted February 22, 2007 The Panthers need their own farm team instead of tapping into Rochester. It's not like they are forcing the Amerks affiliation with them. Rochester chose to do it for financial reasons. :rolleyes: If I remember correctly, the Sabres #%^$#!ed around renewing their deal with Rochester and that's how Florida ended up with half a stake in the team. Anyone rememebr the details? I think it centered around financial aspects and the fact that Buffalo would not supply any AHL vets for the roster. I wonder how that would impact the Amerks. :rolleyes:
Orange Seats Posted February 22, 2007 Report Posted February 22, 2007 Does "AHL Vet" mean "no chance of making the NHL"? So, the Sabres weren't willing to pay for AHL only players that wouldn't be in the farm system
FogBat Posted February 22, 2007 Report Posted February 22, 2007 Does "AHL Vet" mean "no chance of making the NHL"? So, the Sabres weren't willing to pay for AHL only players that wouldn't be in the farm system I know this is going to sound harsh, and I say this with all due respect, but it seems like the name Jody Gage comes to mind.
inkman Posted February 22, 2007 Report Posted February 22, 2007 I know this is going to sound harsh, and I say this with all due respect, but it seems like the name Jody Gage comes to mind. Actually Steve Donner comes to my mind. Does "AHL Vet" mean "no chance of making the NHL"? So, the Sabres weren't willing to pay for AHL only players that wouldn't be in the farm system Buffalo had these players in Rochester for years. Chris Taylor, Mike Hurlbut, Scott Nichol, Scott Metcalf just to name a few.
shrader Posted February 22, 2007 Report Posted February 22, 2007 Actually Steve Donner comes to my mind. Buffalo had these players in Rochester for years. Chris Taylor, Mike Hurlbut, Scott Nichol, Scott Metcalf just to name a few. And all were put in place prior to the dual affiliation. Unfortunately, money rules all now and the only time guys like that are going to get jobs are with young, "not quite playoff contenders yet" teams.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.