nucci

it's not our job to say who.....that's the GMs job. We just want the team to get better.

or we just suck I'm a huge fan too, doesn't mean I know how to run a sports team

Good points and while I agree and also think Tage will continue to produce these numbers, Pastrnak has done it longer and sometimes you pay for players past as well as future. Plus he produces in the playoffs.

incredible there are still blackouts is some sports

I dropped directv and now have youtube tv and disney bundle. I'm not in Buffalo so I watch games on ESPN+. Picture quality is great. I have comcast so my internet is excellent.

every year someone here predicts the Bruins demise....

that's not good value for a 40 goal scorer on one the best teams in the league?

First, 3-4 years is a few chances to win the Cup. Also, many say every year that these teams are going to start falling off but they never do. Bruins just signed Pastrnak when some said they couldn't afford to. The top teams usually stay on top while we never get there. And yes, those teams could destroy each other but it will be during the playoffs

Every year someone here says the Bruins are in trouble, they can't sign their players......

30 other teams obviously weren't all interested in him. Were 30 other teams interested in every player that was traded recently?

making a few trades to improve the team isn't changing course. If his plan is to rely only on developing his draft picks, that won't win a Cup

which top contenders would trade for Anderson?

that's not what he said. He said things have changed.

someone also mentioned we need to make smart trades....so there's that

So you want Adams to improve the team without giving anything in return?

I'll give you the home game part

such a cliche whenever you play a lesser team. Sabres are fighting for a playoff spot. Are you saying they're looking past this game?

just because one trade went like that doesn't mean every trade will

Sorry

ooops

Buffalonill Posted 11 hours ago Good happy we didn’t get him like the the rookies alot we dont need him Change your mind?

Agree. You complain about these things when you lose 7-4. When you win 7-4 in a big game like this, you enjoy it

No he wouldn't. Hasek regularly faced 40 shots with a team that played horrible defense

Turds

but they weren't. Using "what if" is a weak argument and irrelevant