It worked out, but in an alternate universe where McClappy leaves the first extra point on the board and doesn't go for two, and continues to kick the PATs, the Bills would have been at 41 points without the field goal. But then the Bills would be in the opposite situation toward the end: Up by less than a field goal and in a position to kill the clock. Changes the dynamic of the game. It all worked out, but I thought that was awful game management to keep doubling down (literally) and going for the two-pointers.
If they just moved on after the first unconverted 2-point attempt and kicked PATs thereafter, they would have been tied at the end and each team would be driving for a game winning FG. What happens then?
I mean, we got the desired result, but if the Bills coaching staff had made "better" decisions after touchdowns they might have lost. They won by playing wrong.