Doohicksie

Rock BOTTOM

Time to pull Uko.

I think that was a total dive by Dach

There's a reason he has a regular gig on NHL Radio.

***** me

Who's that in the studio with Duff? Is that Kaleta?

Who's that with Duffer? Kaleta? This TEAM is NSFW

He had a swipe at the rebound. I don't think McDavid could have done any better to be honest.

The SH attempt? It was a bouncing pass with the Dman closing it. What would you expect?

We out shot the Habs 2-0 on that PK. Positive sign? Our turn on the PP.

Thinking about switching to the French language Habs coverage...

Boy they left Laine ALL ALONE.

That's AGAINST Benson???

Okay guys, you escaped. Now do something.

It all depends on what the definition of it's.

In my younger days I got all bent out of shape for people using the word insure when they actually meant ensure. I looked it up and they were not, in fact, interchangeable. When I finally confronted someone about it, I grabbed a dictionary to show the guy his error and in this one, one of the meanings for insure was, in fact, to ensure something. That's when I gave up and realized that grammar is descriptive (based on how words are actually used) and not prescriptive (based on how they should be used). You mean the two phrases have opposite meaning? When either one is used, the intent is the same. All the time. They both mean "don't care."

Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while, yeah?

Y'all can be as mad as you want at "could care less" but here's the thing: Whether someone says "could care less" or "couldn't care less", it communicates the same exact thing and everyone knows it. Idioms work that way; they're not necessarily literally true or correct, but they effectively communicate an idea. So... I can't be bothered much with how someone says it.

Testing, testing, 1, 2, 3. Testing. Can you see this, inky, or do you still have me on ignore? Eh. It's been done before.

The exception that proves the rule.