Doohicksie

Motivated Wackadoodles.

Hopefully it's only only for a game or so.

You say hodgepodge. I'm looking forward to it.

It will happen eventually I'm sure. I am totally off Twitter now. Deleted everything in my account, then deactivated it.

Duh. I knew that. Fixed.

Levi finally got his second win.

Nope, gifs are not going away even if the giphy plug-in does.

Totally replaceable and yet he's been carving out a role under Lindy. I thought with all the bottom sixers brought in it would push Krebs out to 13th man, but he really fits well with the new guys. They're more than just toughness and defense, there's also a bit of scoring potential when they're out there.

If only there was a workaround, like going to the giphy site, and copying the url to paste in here.... A little less convenient and keeping one extra browser tab open, but workable.

https://bsky.app/profile/joeyerdon.bsky.social/post/3layxid4ogc25 Sounds pretty routine until he say "They may need to make an adjustment there." It would probably mean a Kulich recall if he can't go.

You know, Krebs had a good game too. Set up the Benson goal- took the pass at the point skated down the boards to the half wall, drawing Suter over to him so that when he passed to Benson there was space for him to walk in on the goal. He made several other smart plays durhing the night. He's maxed out at 3C but he's not in over his head at that level.

He was.... is he addicted to the stuff or what?

The mentioned the chicken parm several times; felt they were overdoing it. Does no other city serve chicken parm?

Simple math: 6-on-5 (end of game with goalie pulled): 1.2 times the manpower 5-on-4: 1.25 times the manpower 4-on-3: 1.33 times the panpower 3-on-2: 1.5 times the manpower (doesn't happen in the NHL but just to show the trend) 2-on-1: 2 times the manpower (ditto)

I disagree with the justification, but basically they said because Benson went into the crease voluntarily, but then was constrained there by the defender, the fact that he went in on his own is why it was called. Watching the replay it looks like he was in the top of the crease but then actually got his feet out of the crease before the puck went in. Ummm.... I dunno. I thought it was a good goal. I'm trying not to look back. That's the best I can do.

Oh, different player for sure. But fills a similar role. Given a choice I'm not sure who I pick. Would I want Mitts back and not have Byram? Or is the team better overall with Byram and McLeod? .... .... ....maybe? Small-ish sample size.

I said earlier that McLeod is our Mitts now. Hangs out on the 3rd line, can elevate to the 1st line if needed.

"Are you talking to *me*?"

Coaching matters.

As much as I love Tage as a player, there's no way he makes the pass McLeod just made.