Archie Lee

To your last paragraph, I think it is giving Adams too much credit. It wasn’t a lie. He thought this was a playoff team, or at least close to it. A GM could not misjudge the potential of a team that he put together, more than Adams misjudged this team.

Again, I agree in principle with your point re: making astute moves to improve a team. You are undervaluing Jensen though, when you refer to him as middling, solid, or as not "good". Jensen has played with Chabot in Ottawa this year on their first pairing. They are by far and away Ottawa's most common D pairing. Jensen is exactly the type of veteran D-man we needed (still need) to bring in to pair with Power.

Some might disagree, but Nick Jensen is a good NHL player. I agree with your post in principle, but it isn't like they traded Joker or Bryson and a 3rd for Chychrun. Frankly, we could use a couple of Nick Jensen's.

I agree and don’t think Pettersson is soft. I think he is more in the category of moody or aloof and he sometimes seems disinterested. That’s just my observation. I remember an interview he gave a few years ago where he was asked about something that had happened recently in the NHL and he answered with: “I don’t know, I don’t watch hockey”. This may be unfair, but it came across as “I’m really good at hockey, but it’s not a passion”. I just couldn’t see Sid or MacKinnon or Dahlin answering the question that way. That could be unfair. He would have been 22-23 at the time and maybe it was just an awkward moment of honesty. My concern is not that he is soft and afraid to go to the dirty places, but rather that he doesn’t always care enough to. It could be that the combination of his knee and having to deal with a teammate who he just can’t stand (perhaps rightly), has caused him to checkout a bit. Here is what I’m pretty certain of: if we trade for Pettersson but do nothing else to address the poor construction of our roster when it comes to depth, maturity, experience, and grit, then the result won’t be much better. For Pettersson to thrive here, there are a lot of issues that need to be resolved. Just getting him won’t resolve our flaws.

I agree. The narrative at the deadline is always buyers and sellers with the teams out of it selling and contenders buying. But players like Bennett and Lehkonen should have been attractive acquisition options for any team not planning on a 5 year rebuild. I don’t really see any such player out there this deadline. The closest examples on teams that might end up being sellers are Cates in Philadelphia, Geekie in Boston, and Romanov with the NYI. McLeod and Byram would be in the category if we were not wanting to pay the going rate for either player, I guess.

Two relatively recent deadline trades that the Sabres could have been in on were Sam Bennett and Artturi Lehkonen. Both were heading into restricted free agency and a year from unrestricted. Florida and Colorado both gave up a 2nd and a prospect respectively. Those trades were steals.

The truth is in the middle. If Power was half as bad as you indicate, his trade value would already have tanked. If we trade Power and don’t get in return a player who provides us with top of the line-up performance for at least 4-5 years, then it will most likely end up being a bad trade. If we can get such a player for Power and find suitable partners for Byram and Dahlin (I don’t love the two together), then I think we are a better team.

Last night’s game did provide some cause to day-dream a bit about just how elite offensively a line of Pettersson centering Thompson and Peterka could be.

Hey, that was fun. Need more of those.

I recognize that 4th line players like Aube-Kubel get waived, claimed, reassigned, called back up, regularly over the course of the NHL season. I suppose you could also say that the emergence of Kulich and Kozak forced their hands and this is good news because it means we have good young players who have earned a spot on the roster. But, you really can't overstate how incredibly flawed the promise of "we added 2/3's of Washington's 4th line" has turned out to be. I went back and watched the Adams press conference from day one of free agency. The trade for Malenstyn and signing of Aube-Kubel and Lafferty were the keys to "rounding out the roster", "becoming more physical", developing "an identity", being a team that "can wear teams out" and "be relentless on the forecheck" and "more responsible defensively". Adams also was clear on the impact Ruff was having on the remaking of the bottom 6. No GM in my memory has more significantly misjudged what he had in his players and coaching staff.

Maybe I’m over-valuing Pettersson. Perhaps his most recent performance combined with his high salary and pending NMC are bigger factors in dragging down his value than I think. On another site I saw a list of players in the Cap-Era who had 400 points in their first 400 games and it’s pretty much a who’s who of modern day future hall of famers. Pettersson is one of only 12 players to do this in the Cap-Era. If I had a choice between waking up tomorrow to a Pettersson trade or an Adams firing, I take the firing. I would prefer a new GM manage any trades or roster changes.

I agree with this. If this trade happens, I think it will be one of Byram or Power, and one of Cozens or Peterka, and one of Benson or Kulich or a 1st rd pick, for Pettersson and a secondary piece, like Desharnais or Forbort. I think some Sabres fans will see that as a fleecing. But the hockey world in general will see the trade as the Sabres getting the elite player.

My best guess is the 3rd piece will need to hurt a little more than a 2nd rd pick.

I am pretty certain that offer doesn’t get us Pettersson, let alone return Joshua as well. I think if you subbed Kulich or Benson for Quinn it might get you Pettersson and a spare D like Desharnais or Forbort. It would likely need to be the centre, Kulich. This trade isn’t happening without the Sabres giving up at least one piece that hurts.

It is certainly odd that Ruff didn’t bring in any assistants. Adams did say in a WGR interview, a few days after the palm tree press conference I think, that It was Ruff’s decision to take some time to get to know the coaches already in the org. Maybe Adams was lying. But, why would Ruff at his age, experience, and pedigree, choose to work under such restrictions? If Ruff has willingly accepted this, then I would say it reflects as poorly on him as it does on Pegula and Adams. My sense is that Ruff has quickly become culpable in this mess. Like Adams, he has accepted the conditions in exchange for holding onto a position that he is no longer particularly good at (in Adams’s case, never was good at).

Just my opinion, but I think the biggest obstacle is Mahones. I love Allen. He is incredible. We are so fortunate to have him. I think we get a Super Bowl in the next 5-7 years with him, maybe two. I have not a negative thing to say about Allen. Just a pure joy to watch the man play. He should be the MVP of this season. But, Mahones might be the best QB of all time.

It would be some kind of hilarious if the Bills fired McDermott and the Sabres keep Adams. And I don’t mean hilarious in the normal funny sense.

Yeah, we need to find the next best coach that has ever lived to beat arguably the current best coach who has ever lived.

They had what seemed like a normal 3 game setback, losing 1-0 to Minnesota, 4-3 in OT to Vancouver and 3-0 to the Islanders. Normal for the last 2 years anyway. Then the Colorado game. Then the press conference. Then the Pegula visit. In hindsight, it was rather quaint how upset we were after the Colorado game. As though things could not have gotten worse from there.

There are fewer than 10 NHL teams that have 3 centres producing more points than McLeod. I don’t think he is close to a write-off. He’s pretty much what you want in a 3rd line centre.

Not that The Athletic's rankings are the be all and end all, but if you accept that they have some merit and you believe in the general idea that it is good to accumulate top players, then getting Pettersson for some combination of 3-4 assets that don't include Dahlin, Thompson, Tuch and Power, is probably a sound decision. Pettersson would be our top player (according to the Athletic's rankings) with the four Sabres I list also making the top 120. Pettersson gives me some cause for worry. Also, I don't like the idea of Adams making a big trade. In a vacuum though, parting with Cozens, Byram, and one of Benson, Quinn, or Peterka, for Pettersson, would likely be viewed as a deal that makes us a better team. This would be particularly so, if it is not the only move and steps are taken to: - get Dahlin and Power the right partners - make a decision on Samuelsson and his contract - keep Zucker and Greenway or add similar players in their place - address the back-up goalie situation - address the coaching staff The problem I have, is the more you consider all of the additional moves that need to be made, the more obvious it becomes that we just don't have a GM who is up to it. So it ends up being the addition of an $11.6 million player with some questionable commitment, to an environment that is rather soul-sucking. Not a great combo.

True. But we had Pegula, Adams, Granato and when we decided to make a coaching change we went for the easy nostalgia hire over an actual search. At the time of the Eichel trade, Vegas had Foley, McPhee, McCrimmon and DeBoer, and when they decided on a coaching change they went out and got Bruce Cassidy. Pettersson would not be coming to anything that resembles a Vegas environment.

On balance, I agree. I would prefer the Sabres move out a couple of young roster players for veterans more ready to win now, and keep their top pick. The challenge is: which young roster players. Kulich has moved himself to the front of the line in value amongst our under 23 forwards, I think. He looks like a centre. Pettersson/Kulich might be a legit one/two centre punch, with McLeod, Krebs, Kozak, Helenius being pretty solid organizational depth.

I’m torn. On the one hand, a big change is needed. On the other hand, I really don’t want Adams to be the architect. I just think he needs to be removed from his GM role and if he makes a Pettersson trade it likely signifies that he and Ruff will be back next year. I think the evidence is now overwhelming that both are not currently good at their jobs. If I had my choice between the two of them being involved in big roster moves or a different GM and head coach overseeing significant but quite a bit more subtle changes, I would choose the latter and it’s not close. On Pettersson’s value. It’s tricky. Obviously he has been a star player. He has high draft pedigree and is still young. He’s a real centre and is quite good/responsible defensively, to go along with 80-90 point potential. But, his offence has declined 2 years in a row. His contract is huge. Fair or unfair, there are questions re: his commitment. There are enough negatives that there should be some drag on his value.

Because there are a lot of players in the NHL aside from Ehlers and Necas. Because we have been able to convince lots of players to take Sabre money.