Archie Lee

I agree with the above. No NHL team should be more than 2-3 years away from being good on the ice if they are good off the ice. The Pegulas are obviously smart and successful people who have done many good things for the community. I don't think they deserve ridicule. They have been guilty I think of trying to over-correct bad decisions. As you indicate, I think that is more in line with being misguided as owners than it is with being bad owners. My great frustration in the Eichel years is that, with the possible exception of his first year, no season has ended with the level of optimism being higher than when the season began. From the beginning of the Eichel years the organization has been unwilling to commit to simply having a plan, growing the talent and taking some additional lumps. Instead we continually take another shot at shortening the rebuild to the point where taking a step back is no longer an option (it should be an option, but it is treated as though it is not). Even this past off-season was an example. I'm not entirely down on this year's team by any means and still do have hope, but there really was no logical reason for this team at this point in its trajectory to target Taylor Hall as an off-season acquisition. This was done in an attempt to jump ahead 3 spaces when, so long as we have a solid plan and are smart in what we are doing, 1 space would due.

It's maybe outside the scope of the poll, but anytime you have this many significant mistakes you have to find the root cause. In this case the clear root cause is ownership. While the jury is still out on the current management, specifically Adams, we have seen a steady string of bad decisions when it comes to hiring. The first sign of bad things to come, which, in hindsight, was pretty glaring, was the replacement of Regier with Lafontaine and Nolan. Regardless of what anyone thinks of any of these 3 individuals, it's a pretty big red-flag when an owner fires a long-time and respected (in NHL circles) GM and replaces him with two popular figures from the team's past who have long-held grievances over their previous controversial departures that just happen to have been overseen by the newly fired GM. This was a clear indication that ownership decisions would not always be made based on rationale thought.

Watch the puck bounce.

You make great points. On the bolded, I would just say that 5v5 defensive play is different than PK. Eakin/Rieder might not be defensive improvements on Larsson/Vesey at 5v5, but still be upgrades at PK.