JohnC

Why wouldn't the GM want to get a deal sooner rather than later? (Rhetorical question.) The cost will go up the longer it takes to get a deal locked up. The issue isn't so much what the GM wants to do as it is what do the players want to do. Dahlin was smart when he took a bridge deal. Now as time passed from that signing, he has demonstrated that he is one of the top defenders in the league. What the elite players in the league are getting is the range in which he will be getting. And you don't have to be a hockey aficionado to recognize how good Power is now, and how much better he is going to get in the near future. Most organizations would be ecstatic to have one elite defenseman on their roster. We inarguably have two. And to top things off, both players are committed to their craft and are committed to their team. Both are players and people you are proud to have representing your franchise. These are two players that when they get the premium dollars they richly deserve, you are happy for them. They earned it.

I agree with everything you said. We are in accord that on this team Krebs projects to be a #4 &3C. (As you stated.) But if injuries happened and he is called upon to move up to a #2C slot on a temporary basis, he should be able to handle that role on a short-term basis without a major diminishment of the line he has moved up to. At the time when Granato moved Krebs to the Okposo/Girgs line I thought it was an odd move. It turned out to be a brilliant move. It transformed his floating junior hockey style game to a NHL style of play that required more discipline and a tighter style of play. As with Mitts and Tage, I see Krebs getting better as he physically matures. There is much discussion here about internal improvement being the engine that will move this team up the ranks. It's going to be fun following players like Krebs, Power, Quinn, JJ etc and watching their growth as NHL players.

As our talent base increases, you can see the value of players having an ability to play a variety of roles. He, like Mitts, has the versatility to move up and down the lines, and play center and forward when needed. Injuries happen. But as demonstrated by Mitts moving up from a third line wing to the first line as a center, there wasn't much of a drop off, if any, of the production on our #1 line. As you point out, Krebs played center on a mostly defensive line, but he also has the ability to play on our specialty units and move up to higher lines if the need arises. Compared to previous years, where the dearth of talent on the roster had players placed on higher lines or pairings than their talent level would indicate. That's less true now.

The grittier style that he was required to play was the reason why he was so much better as a player. To his credit, he seemed to embrace that adjustment to his prior style of play. There is still more growth potential to his game on both sides of the ice. That's a credit to him and the coaching staff.

The 50% that you label as inadequate is the lower half of the unit. You don't think that the GM is aware that the blueline unit needs to be strengthened? If the GM is not aware of that particular deficiency, then why did he pursue Chycrun just prior to the trade deadline? I'm confident that this offseason the GM is going to add to the group. Will a top two pairing caliber player be brought in? I believe so. But if that type of transaction can't be added, I'm confident that at the minimum maybe two 4/5 caliber of players will be added to the mix. It will not only strengthen the unit but will provide depth that is also needed. As far as the goalie situation, there is no question that the play was uneven. (Trying to be kind.) But even if Comrie and UPL are still on the roster, that position will be strengthen with the addition of Levi. I don't know how anyone can't be excited about him in net next year? I don't disagree with your identification of where this roster's main deficiencies are. It's not a secret because it's evident to everyone. However, I do have some criticism of your perspective in that you get too fixated with the current deficiencies without balancing out the strengths of the roster. This team improved by 16 points from the previous year. That's not trivial. The Sabres beat a lot of top tier teams. And when you watched them against the best teams, even when they lost, it was rare where you can say that they were overmatched. Usually, the sensation was that we were just as good as the quality opposition when both teams were playing well. As others have said, the major reason why this roster will continue to get better will be through internal improvement. That's the exciting part of this roster. Young players such Quinn, JJ and Power still have a lot of potential to draw from. I agree with much of the particulars that you have said. On the other hand, I disagree with how you don't look at the roster from a broader perspective. It's a step-by- step approach. It doesn't come all at once.

Very often, taking over a program that is at an inflection point as whether to rebuild or continue to hang on a as a marginal playoff team is a good situation to take over. If a decision is made by the owners to bring in a new staff to reconstruct the program, then that would be a good situation for a new staff because it would need a number of years to execute such a plan. If the owners wanted to retain its core in Crosby and Maulkin and build around the fading group, then that would be an almost possible situation to throw yourself into. When Karmonos joined the KA staff he knew that the strategy was to dramatically rebuild the organization, top to bottom. The advantage that KA had was that he had a core that was still relatively young that would have value when dealt. KA was masterful in maximizing their value and receiving multiple assets back to help restore the talent base in the system. He was also fortunate to have a young core in players such as Tage, Cozens and Dahlin that was able to step up and fill the void left by the departures. You are absolutely right that anyone taking on the Pittsburgh job should not expect a quick fix. When Karmonos joined the Sabres I'm sure he had an idea of how long it would take to restore this dilapidated franchise into a successful operation. The big issue is more about what the owners expect and would be willing to allow the new management group to do. Will they give the new crew the resources, authority and time to do what needs to be done? What's interesting about the Karmonos consideration for a GM position is that it says a lot about the franchise that he would be coming from. It says that the operation is a success and that the people working there are appealing candidates for other jobs.

Attached is a link from WGR where Paul Hamilton talks about the locker cleanout. It is a 20 min segment. In the beginning of the segment, he talks about the injuries. It was very extensive. Samuelsson and Tage were playing with a number of injuries. https://www.audacy.com/wgr550/authors/howard-and-jeremy-show

Now I got it. As you are well aware I can be thick at times. 🍺

Having coaching changes certainly wouldn't be much of a surprise. The PK was less than mediocre. I'm not suggesting that the Sabres won't consider options in net. They should. But when all is said and done, I'm comfortable with the stance I have taken. However, if an upgrade is brought in, I would be all for it. I just don't see it happening. I want you to know that I am an empathetic person. I will with warmth, gentleness and grace be consoling you when we enter the next season with the goalie staffing that we currently have. 🍷

What did Eleven consider to be the core problem?

None of us knows what he is going to do. I'm offering my opinion just like everyone else. I agree with you that KA has assets to bring in a 1B. I just don't see him doing it. If I had to make a prediction, Comrie would be the backup goalie. I also don't believe that this organization has given up on UPL. However, if he is claimed off of waivers, then so be it.

No, I don't believe he will bring in another goalie. I see Levi as our primary goalie with Comrie as the likely main backup. The three he has will be the three goalies the organization will be working with. I don't believe the staff has given up on UPL.

He already has that type of player you are describing. It's Comrie.

No, I don't believe that he will bring in another goalie. I believe that Levi is going to be the primary goalie, with Comrie and UPL competing for the backup. If I had to guess, I would bet that Comrie becomes the main backup. If KA is going to make any significant acquisitions, it will be on the blueline. His pursuit of Chycrun indicated to me that is where his attention will be on this offseason.

Do you believe that KA is going to bring another goalie in the offseason? I don't. I expect Levi to be our primary goalie with Comrie and UPL competing for the backup position. If Comrie becomes the backup, then UPL will go to Rochester. If he is claimed, which is a possibility, then so be it. The issue becomes: will another team claim him to be a backup. I'm not sure he has such an appeal for other teams at this point. We'll have to wait and see how things sort out this offseason. Where I diverge with many here is that I don't believe that our GM has foreclosed Comrie as one of our goalies for next year. Many here have a different view. I'm fine with that.

You took the response, especially the picture, too seriously. It's not as harsh as you seem to perceive.

Very thoughtful and well written response. No easy answers.

I can introduce you to a few of our unyielding and prolific publishing members who might change your mind about this board.

I don't know how good or not UPL is going to be. That's the point. Ullmark was far from being an automatic success in his extended journey as a prospect. With goalies you just never know for sure in their long and winding road to development. I'm simply more patient than you are in waiting to see how it materializes. I'm intrigued to see how the GM handles this situation.

He's not a traitor. He just needs to drink more. 🍷

With certain posters you come to realize that you are living on two different planets and realities. These disparate realities can never coexist. I'm sure I am as odd to them as they are sometimes to me. That's life.

Krueger was an unmitigated disaster. His record speaks for itself. What boogie man are you chasing?

I respectively but strenuously disagree with you. It seems that you are making a conclusive judgment on Comrie? Why? He was plagued by injuries this season that had an effect on his play. You have to remember that the GM and his staff made an analytical judgment on Comrie when they signed him last year. Maybe he wasn't their first preference, but they went through with their evaluation and acquired him. Again, why are you making a conclusive judgment on UPL? He is still young. How long did it take for Ullmark, who was drafted in 2012, to come to fruition as a NHL player? UPL played much of the season with the Sabres. The original plan was to play him full-time in Rochester. He ended being brought up due to injuries. He was inconsistent. That shouldn't be surprising. The issue of him being exposed and claimed off waivers certainly is a complicating feature. But if he is dealt, what do you think his value is? I agree with you that sometimes prospects and UFA signings don't work out. And sometimes people make hasty judgments on players that come back to haunt you. My sense of our GM is that he is more comfortable with following his blueprint of mostly building through the system. He is willing to make deals but for the most part they are incremental deals. If I had to bet on what his approach to the netminding position will be this offseason, my money is on him taking the status quo approach. I know you disagree. That's fine. We'll see how it unfolds.

What's our system? Exposing our goalies to a barrage of high danger shots in every game? I really believe that the GM is going to stick with Comrie and UPL entering next season. He most likely will improve the play of the goalies on hand by shoring up the blue line unit and place a greater emphasis on two-way play for the team, as was done at the end of the season during the playoff run. I'm confident that you are going to be very disappointed with the lack of transactions regarding the goalie position this offseason.

Krueger took a $9M player and turned him into a less than $1M player. From a cap/value standpoint, he turned a rich estate into a ghetto property. It was insanity running amuck. How much more damaged could he have wrought on this franchise if he was still the coach for another year? It didn't take the new GM too long to right the ship of this sinking franchise. Getting rid of Krueger and then installing DG as the interim coach, and then extending him as the full-time coach was the jolt that changed the course of this flailing franchise. There is a saying that applies to Krueger: Addition by subtraction.