JohnC

Are you aware that you are agitating @GASabresIUFANby suggesting that Stillman will be on the roster next season. He's already in a frenzied state over that roster spot. He needs to be tranquilized, not poked at. 😄

You are going to be in a state of apoplexy next season when Stillman and Joki are introduced on the PA system in the first home game as members of the 23-24 Sabres. I agree with you that the GM needs to add to the unit. Based on the GM's pursuit of Chycrun, I'm confident that a 4/5 defenseman or maybe even two will be added to the roster. I don't understand your constant haranguing about Joki. It's become an obsession with you. He is a 4/5 defenseman. If a better player is added, then he could be dropped to the third pairing. You may have a jaundiced view of him but his coach certainly doesn't have that same evaluation of him. It's the opposite. He repeatedly states that he believes that this young player will get even better. You bring up an interesting issue regarding Lyubushkin. There was maybe a sequence of half dozen games where I thought he was one of our better players on that unit. Other than that, he was generally average to sometimes solid. I got the impression that he was hurt for most of the season. If he can be a consistent third or even fourth pairing player, it would be such a bonus.

Stillman is still a young player. Even if his upside is as fourth pairing player, you got him for a player who is more likely not to even become a NHL player. If you can get another lower pairing player for a fifth round pick, then add that player to roster and create more depth on the thin unit. I just don't understand your reasoning that giving up nothing for something is worthy of scoffing at.

How is it a bad deal to give up a player that you believe is unlikely to become a useful or even a NHL player in the league for a defenseman who is a lower pairing player on your roster? Stillman is a young player. Even if at best he remains a lower pairing player that doesn't mean that he can't be a capable player at that pairing level. That's not a wasted move. It's a good move.

Let me add to what you said about Golisano's business savvy. What Golisano did when he bought the team is closely review the books from the prior ownership. What he saw was financial chaos and a lot of intermingling of funds. He quickly got that in order. He established hard budgets for all the departments including the core of the business, the hockey operation. Although the tight budgets crimped the hockey staff from making some decisions they wanted to make, it benefited the hockey operation and business in general by forcing the operaton to be more disciplined and analytical when making decisions. He quickly changed the culture and ethos of the franchise by bringing order and discipline within the company. As you point out, he demonstrated his business savvy by buying low and selling high. He got a good return on his investment in a relatively short period of time. Good for him. There is another aspect relating to character in this story. The franchise was in bankruptcy. When he took-over he wasn't required to pay all the debts accrued from the vendors and service providers because of the bankruptcy rules. He paid them off anyway. When asked why, he simply said it was the right thing to do and that he wasn't in the business of stiffing people. What's clear is that Tom Golisano is a tough businessman; and he is also an honorable person.

This link taken from NHL.com doesn't answer your question about what percentage of ownership Quinn has. However, it is a 5 min + segment that talks about him getting involved with Golisano to buy the Sabres. At the end of the segment, Quinn talks about how important the Commissioner, Bettman, was in keeping the franchise in Buffalo. It should be highlighted that Golisano, a person who had little interest in hockey, was instrumental in keeping the franchise in Buffalo. https://www.nhl.com/sabres/video/larry-quinn-interview-21320/t-277437090/c-5252437

I don't know of any high-profile player in any sport with a prominent role on a team who had his role marginalized who wouldn't have in some form publicly express his displeasure. Skinner simply couldn't proficiently play the style of play that Krueger wanted. He put in the effort to adapt to Krueger's system. It wasn't a match and would never be a match. I don't remember any twitter responses or critical comments to reporters about the coach. The player bided his time and allowed time to catch up with the coach's failed approach to the game. Another player who had to be frustrated by the shackles of Krueger's approach to the game was Dahlin. I'm not saying that he didn't exhibit any frustration playing for Krueger, but I don't recall any public expression of it.

Playoff hockey is at another level. Ryan Reaves pumping up his team when given the duty/honor to read the roster before the game. https://www.nhl.com/news/ryan-reaves-enthusiastically-reads-minnesota-wild-starting-lineup-before-playoff-matchup/c-343827886?tid=281396148

Kris Baker's discussion on the Sabre Sabre prospect pool was terrific. It highlighted the fact that Savoie and Kulich are high end prospects who next year will be legitimate NHL prospects. The takeaway from this clip is that the system is filled with a robust number of good prospects. At the end of the clip Baker talks about Ryan Johnson. He likes him a lot and strongly believes that Buffalo would be a good situation for him to come to.

A while back on WGR, Granato was talking about Skinner when he was virtually exiled as a player by Krueger. He said what impressed him about Skinner was that even though his role on the team was severely diminished, he was still one of the hardest workers in practice. The coach noted that he did more post practice individual skill training than any other player. The more that the former coached buried him, the harder that he worked on his game. He had an irrepressible spirit that couldn't be broken by a misguided coach.

I have never met him and don't know him. I have listened on WGR to maybe half a dozen people who do know him from his playing days and worked with him in other capacities who all virtually say the same things about him i.e. that he is intelligent, works well with people and listens to what others have to say before making a decision. Simply stated, his leadership/management style is more of a collaborator than autocratic, top/down approach. In addition, he has talked on multiple radio broadcasts (for me mostly on WGR) about his approach to rebuilding the franchise. Based on what he has frequently stated it's not difficult to decipher what his philosophy is as the head of this franchise. He often refers to the Carolina model of having a deep team and not being dependent on a few individual players. As you stated, the plan that he had and laid out when he took the GM position is the plan that he is executing.

Before you shut the door you need to go back into the room. You got it backwards. His talent to converse is far from being sterling, while his talent to listen is. He's a proponent that you learn more from listening to other people than you do talking to other people. That's why in his short tenure he has been successful. There's still a lot more to do but the course he has set is the right course. At least, that is how I see it.

You and I agree on Adams. As I said in a prior post, he is more of a collaborator than a driver of policy. He surrounded himself with people who were very experienced in the hockey business, even more so than he was. He would be the first to admit that. You have to be very secure to do that. KA is more of a listener than a talker. He assembled a first-class staff, gave them a wide berth, and empowered them. That's why as the head of the franchise he has been a sterling success.

On that issue we are in accord. One area where I have admiration for him is that he is more of a collaborator than a driver on issues. That approach works when you are secure enough to surround yourself with top notch people. His hiring of Karmonos, a more experienced front office executive, is an example of not only surrounding yourself with quality staff but also listening to them. His hiring of Granato made a profound difference on the roster and team.

It is hyperbole to say that the roster was completely dismantled because as you point out that wasn't the case. But it is not hyperbolic to say that there was a near total dismantling of the organization as it pertains to the front office and staff. The scouting department was not retained. The coaching staff, after Granato was named as the permanent replacement, was replaced. The Rochester staff was also let go. KA brought in Karmonos as his assistant GM and also gave him a lot of additional responsibilities, including designating him the Rochester GM. This franchise became more reliant on analytics after he became the GM. The ethos and culture of this organization was dramatically changed. What I want to emphasize here is don't discount the near total rebuilding of the organization in this franchise's progress. You are right that the Sabres still retained a number of former first round draft picks. But let's look at how they were handled after a new GM was installed. The former players who formed the previous core who were high first round picks such as Eichel, Reinhart and to a lesser extent Risto. They were all dealt. And the remaining high first round draft picks such as Skinner, Tage and Dahlin replaced the departed core. Prior to KA, those players in the Krueger era were inexplicably stifled by Krueger and his outdated hockey philosophy. Credit has to be given to KA for not only dispatching the old core but also getting a fair return on them. And credit has to be given to KA for being smart enough to replace Krueger with Granato on an interim basis, and then on a more permanent basis. You are correct that this roster wasn't totally dismantled but it went through a major reshuffling. There were a lot of good organizational decisions made in that reshuffling of the roster.

I'm not a prospect aficionado and won't pretend to be. But as you noted, most of the evaluations I have read about him place him as a third pairing caliber of prospect. I would love to get him in the system because of the dearth of defensemen in the system. But as you emphasized, third pairing players are more readily available on the market than top two pairing players. I really don't believe that getting Johnson to sign is something the GM is worried about. In contrast, I'm sure it was a priority for KA to get Levi signed as soon as possible. I remember last year when KA was on WGR and talked about not being able to sign Ullmark. He stated that the organization does its due diligence and places a value on a player and the cost/contract. He emphasized that you have to believe in your staff and their evaluations, and then have the fortitude and discipline to abide by them. The Ullmark situation was a difficult decision. On the other hand the Johnson situation is not something he is going to lose sleep over.

I understand what you are saying. However, I have a little different perspective on the Sabres rebuild than you do. There is no question that it isn't to the point of completion. We all agree on that. But my perspective/interpretation of success in Buffalo is that compared to where it started, and where it is now, this rebuilding process is a resounding success. No question there is more to do. But right now, I would deem it to be on course and a success. The organization was completely dismantled and rebuilt. The farm system that was considered to be shallow is now restocked to the point where it is rated one of the more talented systems. The old core has been dealt, and the return in assets was more than solid. There isn't one aspect on the ice or front office that has gone through a major overhaul isn't significantly upgraded. And I'm confident in saying that most outside observers would also acknowledge those improvements. The upgraded product on the ice underscores all those points.

I wholeheartedly agree with that. Either you are committed to the team, or you are not. Because he talks so much about players wanting to be here, I have the impression that he is wary of players/prospects who even show some hesitancy about being a Sabre.

I'm not sure what you mean by jumping the gun with respect to my comments. The point I was attempting to make is that any GM candidate should know from a general standpoint what direction the owners want to take the team. Is it a full-blown rebuild, a partial rebuild or a status quo approach upon assuming the position? If it is a major rebuild, that would entail trading assets such as Crosby and Malkin for future assets. If it is a partial rebuild, it might be trading only Malkin and keeping Crosby. If the owners wanted to stay as competitive as possible, it would most likely mean keeping both players. When KA assumed the GM position, he had a rebuild blueprint in mind. He was determined to trade our old core for future assets and elevate a newer younger core already on the roster. There is no question that the owner was on board when he hired KA to lead the hockey operation. Pittsburgh has been a cup contender for quite a while. Most people would consider them approaching the down cycle from a competitive standpoint. Recognizing where your team is in that cycle is what I was referring to when I described the situation as an inflection point. When Karmonos joined the Sabre organization, he knew exactly what the GM's plans were for the rebuild. He also knew that owner was on board to the GM's plan. If Karmonos is a serious candidate for the Penguin job, his views should align with how the owners want to proceed. If they don't, there would be problems right from the start. I'm sure someone as smart as he is in the business is aware of that.

What the Johnson saga is demonstrating is that the Sabres are at a stage where it doesn't very much matter whether he signs or not. If he does, that would be great. It will add to the growing stable of prospects. It's more likely than not that if he signs, he will start off in Rochester. Johnson has to make a decision to what he believes is in his own best interest. I still think that if he reviews his options that Buffalo gives him the best opportunity to play in the NHL sooner rather than later. The GM has set his boundaries, and he is sticking to them. The organization is now run in an orderly way. The haphazard and undisciplined way of doing business is a thing of the past.

The issue regarding the lacking defensive play is also influenced by the defensive play of our forwards. In the last dozen to fifteen games, there was a noticeable recognition that the lines had to play a more responsible two-way style of hockey. And they did play that tighter brand of hockey. Again, what will be the driving force for improvement will be internal improvement. I'm counting on that more than outside help. Although, that doesn't mean that I don't want to see additions.

I'm more upbeat about next season if your projection materializes. The lineup that you posted is capable of making the next step. If a single defenseman is brought in who is a #4 caliber of player, that would have a positive cascading affect for the unit. If two #5s were brought in, it would also reinforce the unit. However, I strongly disagree with you that much is dependent on Levi is spectacular. I don't see that as a requirement for this team to move up the ranks. What I want is for Levi to be consistently good and the backups to be solid. In my view, if the Sabres would have that caliber of netminding all season long, the Sabres would have earned close to eight to ten more points in the standings. The Sabres were not that far off from being a playoff team this season. Next season, mostly due to internal improvement and some additions to the blueline, this team should have their playoff position secured sooner and not be in such a precariously playoff position that it was in this season. You need to be more upbeat. Your pessimism is self-generated. Based on what has already happened, it shouldn't be the case.

You make a good point that if the organization makes some visible moves this offseason, especially on the blueline, it will give more credence to the belief that next year's team will be a serious team. The end of the season crowds this past season were larger and more engaged. That's what happens when you have something to play for and cheer for. Starting the season off well will create an enthusiasm and demand for a product that should carry on throughout the season. If the team starts off slowly, the fan momentum will be stalled and the "wait until you show me" fan attitude will continue on.

When the room is dead the juices don't flow. 🏒

Mike Harrington wrote an article in the Buffalo News yesterday listing the Sabres record on the road and at home. The road record was 25-13-3 while the home record was17-20-4. What stood out was the team's record when there were 17000 plus people in the arena: It was 10-5-2. When the attendance was below 17000, the record was 7-15-2. Most of our dud games were in front of small crowds. As was evident at the end of the season when the team was making a playoff run, the fans filled the arena and the players played with a lot more energy. It's important that next season the team starts off. It needs to quickly show the fans that this team has turned the corner and is now a serious team in the league. How this team finished this season should augur well for even some of the skeptics next season.