JohnC

There is a good reason why he hasn't been able to consummate a deal for an upper tier defenseman and goalie: It has to do with the cost associated with the assets moving out and the talent and contract coming in. Do you doubt that he has been making the calls, as all GMs do, to bring in players? There are a lot of people who wanted to give up our #1 pick for a defenseman or a goalie. I'm not in that camp. I'm glad that the GM used the pick for the player he got in the draft. I like Hanifin. But I would prefer keeping our pick and picking up a lesser but still a good defenseman in Clifton. In general, I have no problem with the judgment that our GM has exercised in adding talent (mostly on the blueline) to the roster.

There is a good chance that the Sabres already have their stalwart goalie in Levi. Time will tell on that. However, there is no denying that the GM already has been successful in expanding the talent base not only for its NHL team but also throughout the system. The GM has been methodical in executing his rebuilding plan. In my mind, he is one year ahead of schedule. Understandably, the GM has recently been criticized by some for his conservatism and unwillingness to make a splash deal in order to accelerate the team's progression. I take a different view. It is because of his resoluteness in adhering to his beliefs is why this franchise has advanced as quickly as it has under his guidance.

I have often heard Marty comment on our goalies. As you point out, he's not a fan of his. The issue becomes does the GM believe that the big goalie can improve on his weaknesses. The major focus was coming into camp better conditioned and quicker. We shall see how this works out.

Echoing what you stated is the reason why I don't believe the GM will deal for a top shelf goalie. Another reason is that a team such as Winnipeg is not going to give up a highly prized asset for a minimal price. There is no question that his upcoming UFL status lowers his trade value. But by biding their time there may come a time in the season where a contending team needs a goalie due to an injury or to compete. The assets that many of the posters want to give up are not satisfactory to the receiving team, and those who advocate paying a higher price for a rental don't take into consideration that KA has a history of being reluctant in giving up assets, especially those that are young. I'm not as aghast with our goalie situation as most are here. The bigger and overriding issue for me is improved team defensive play. With the additions that KA made so far it should help in that area. I'm really excited about the upcoming season!

You are one member of a large crowd. It seems to get larger by the day. I'm marching to a different tune. Most people would say I'm out of step. 🙃

I just don't think based on how he has conducted business during his tenure that he is interested in shedding assets for goalies that he doesn't believe are either worth the cost or at a level that isn't, as he perceives it, better than what we currently have. I agree with your last sentence. It is a comment that gets @GASabresIUFAN very agitated and riled up.

What goalie do you think is available and would fit our needs?

The issue is not what would you be willing to give up as it is what would Winnipeg be willing to accept for their prized goalie. If you offered Rosen for Helle, the snickering from the team located in western Canadian would turn into an uproarious laughter. As @dudacekhas wisely pointed out the market for goalies that would be considered an upgrade from what we have has diminished almost to the point of being nonexistent.

It would be a fleeting consideration because of Helle's contract status. Since KA has taken over he has been inclined to acquire assets and been reluctant to shed them, especially for someone who could walk away in one year. That's not how he operates.

I have no problem with Levi being the primary goalie and the other two goalies competing for the backup duty. There are a few elite goalies and many more jags playing the position. And considering the reality that most goalies (not elite ones) are very mercurial and can't be predicted how they would perform season in and season out. My recommendation is to keep your assets and stay the course. The best way to improve the play of our netminders is for this team to play better two-way hockey. Our blue line unit has been strengthened, hopefully our PK will benefit with the added players and our lines need to play a more responsible game in their end. It's the general defensive play of the team where our attention should be focused on.

There were many factors why the PK was horrendous. He wasn't the problem. Sometimes stats aren't as illuminating as people think. They don't often give the context in which the numbers are accumulated. In the end of season playoff chase the team tightened up defensively. His line was a factor for that improvement by working against the top lines of the many good teams it faced. There are reasons associated with leadership factoring into his returning back this upcoming season. It's not in dispute that he is a contributor more on the defensive end than on offensive end. That's the role that fourth liners perform. My point is that he is not a liability to this team. If he were, he would have retired and worked for the organization in some compacity.

You are wrong. His line was one of the better defensive lines in the league. Without question he was an instrumental player on that line. At the end of season playoff run, Granato constantly put his line on the ice to stymie the other team's best line as the game was winding down. Just because at this stage in his career he isn't much of a scorer doesn't mean that his role as a fourth line player isn't important.

Anyone who has watched the opposing team's broadcast of Sabre games recognizes that the outsider's view of the Sabres is very high. In general, I would say that it is higher than the locals' view. There has been a dramatic perception change over the past couple of years. The point of demarcation came when KA took over and in relative short order reworked and remade the roster.

@K-9made the point in a previous post that with the addition of Clifton and Johnson, our penalty kill should be much better. Another benefit would be that Dahlin and maybe Power wouldn't have to play so many minutes because they would have less usage there. Not having to accumulate those added minutes on the ice should help them as the season grinds on.

Yes, he did. He dropped the mike and it fell on his foot. He limped off the stage with a broken toe. The audience roared with laughter. 🤡

I'm in the same corner. It's too crowded for @PromoTheRobotto join in. Just send him to the basement and lock the door. 🤡

What player/s on the team didn't get along with his/their teammates? I don't recall one instance where there was a report or even a rumor of friction in the locker room.

As you point out there should be better PK play. And there should be better blueline play due to the players added and the depth they provide to handle injures. Will our lines play a better two-way game? They demonstrated they can in their end of season run. If Levi plays as well as he did in his highly pressurized short stint, then this is clearly a better team than last year's team. The issue then becomes if UPL and Comrie are on the roster, will they have better years than they did last year. I believe so.

When you overpay for players such as Ehrhoff the franchise stench becomes more tolerable to take. Overpriced contracts are more likely to happen to troubled franchises in order to attract players. That's not going to happen under KA.

Moving Joki is a logical suggestion. But I'm stating a different opinion in that I believe that this staff values Joki much more than the audience here. I don't see a logjam here. What I see is the unit from top to bottom getting stronger. That's a good thing and not something to lament.

I understand your view but respectfully disagree with. The so called "bad team tax" for the most part has recently been dispelled. At least so far, the reason that some good players haven't been added to the roster is KA's determination not to overspend on players, even players he would like to bring on. KA and the organization is very data driven. He's looking for value. He's very disciplined when considering talent relative to cost. KA has openly stated that he is ready to deal to fill needs. He's choosy and tight fisted on this issue. I'm confident that shortly there will be additional deals to upgrade the blueline.

Don't count on it. Granato is more enamored with the player and his upside than the audience here. This audience previously scorned Mitts. That perception has changed. The same alteration in perception will change for Joki. I'm confident that with a little more patience your current dim view will become brighter.

Accepting the fact that he isn't a top two pairing player doesn't mean that adding another third pairing type player to the unit won't be beneficial. What the Samuelsson injury demonstrated last year is that the unit lacked depth. When an injury happened to one of the higher pairings it had a negative cascading effect to the other pairings. No question that most of us want a second pairing talent added to the unit. But if that plan can't be executed then adding a couple of 4/5 players would certainly be beneficial.

He may have a lot of knowledge and passion for baseball but it is not one of the sports that is highlighted on WGR. Hockey and football dominate the airspace. The reality on all sports shows is that a large portion of the responses by the callers are not "intelligent takes". If the host is dismissive or demeaning to the caller, it has an effect on how the listeners respond to the host i.e. the likeability issue. I'm not declaring Schopp to be a good or bad guy. I don't know him. In reality, he may be a warm, engaging and wonderful guy. What I'm commenting on is how he comes off to the listener. For me, (speaking only for myself) he comes off as a condescending fellow. When one is in the communication business, how one presents oneself and how one is perceived by the audience is a central part of the business. I'm simply not a fan of him and his show.

Behind the mike he comes off as a person who is pompous and condescending. I find him to be insufferable. Maybe, outside of his work environment he is a more likeable chap? He's figured out a way to survive in the Buffalo market. I just don't know what the appeal is. I'm stumped.