JohnC

Responding to your last bullet point, Buffalo's location should be an attractive consideration for players because so many of them come from the Toronto and southern Ontario area. As an example, Power's family can attend all his home games.

The issue isn't "who cares" or "doesn't care" about a young player. The Sabres are at a point where they are genuinely competing for a playoff spot or more. If the organization believes that Comrie gives them a better chance to win as a backup goalie, then he should be the backup goalie. If the organization believes that UPL is the better option as a backup, then he should be the backup. The Sabres missed the playoffs by a point or two last year. The margin of error is small. Players compete for their roster spot. How else should it be done?

Thanks for your knowledgeable response. I agree with you that other considerations such as the issue of opportunity to play and best situation from a variety of standpoints override the money issue.

I have a tax question that has been talked about on the radio before as it pertained to money directed towards building a stadium. Do players on an opposing out of state team pay the state taxes for games in the visiting jurisdiction. Isn't it comparable to a worker for a company paying the required tax for the location he is working in?

The concern shouldn't be who will be exposed to the waiver wire or not. If Comrie beats out UPL for the backup role and he is lost to the waiver wire, then so be it. If UPL beats out Comrie, then he gets exposed. The Sabres are at a stage where they have the talent to seriously compete. The priority issue now is who will be the better backup and give you the best chance to win when inserted into the lineup. None of us knows for sure how our goalie ranking will turn out. The expectation is that Levi will be the primary goalie and the other two goalies will compete for the backup role. I doubt that the organization is going to carry three goalies as they did last year. If I had to bet I would place it UPL being the backup goalie. The bottom line is that the players competing for the backup role will determine their own fate. And that's how it should be.

Moreso with Comrie than UPL, if he is sent down I don't think he will be picked up by another club. I think UPL would be more appealing to another team. At the end of the preseason most teams are making tough decisions on their final cuts. As I said in the prior post, if one of the two is picked up you just move on deal with it.

Odds are that two goalies will be on the NHL roster and third goalie will be sent down to Rochester. If the goalie sent down gets picked up, then so be it.

Within this WGR 28-minute link is a discussion on Sabres Live with Mathew Fairborn. In the first part of the discussion he talks about Olofsson. In the end of the appearance he discusses the goalie situation. Good talk about the upcoming season and the roster. https://www.audacy.com/wgr550/hosts/sabres-live

Just a general comment about your proposed lineup. It's a good lineup with a number of players with much more upside to draw from such as Power, JJP, Krebs, Samuelsson, Mitts (because he will be playing with better linemates) and Greenway (because he should be coming into camp healthy and better conditioned). And with the increase in the talent base there are a lot of interchangeable parts to work with when injuries happen. The Quinn injury is a frustrating setback. There was a consensus that he was most likely to be a breakout player in the young group.

No one's lecturing you. I don't give a dam what you think. Just don't respond back. You act as if you are the final authority on things, especially when there is a difference in views. You talk about me responding in a condescending manner when that was not the case. You are projecting your own arrogance. At times you are insightful and at times you are insufferable. (In general, I don't like communicating with a harsh tone. Doing so has the tendency of lowering the discourse level for everyone.) With you, I have no compunction doing so. You are being ridiculous. The problem is that you lack the self-awareness to understand how you are behaving. Just go take a hike and use the ignore button.

Would you be reluctant to keep Kulich up with the big club if he shines in camp? I wouldn't be reluctant to reward outstanding play.

Not necessarily so. I agree with you that ideally it would be better to work on their games in the lower levels. But because of the Quinn injury opening up a spot, if either one of them demonstrates in camp and in preseason games that they are capable of playing at the next level, then I wouldn't hold either one of them back. It's not unusual to have surprise players who stick out in camp. If a player merits a look, then I would reward the player and give him an opportunity to play.

Thanks for the information. Just curious. You said that the price at the pump is regulated. Is it regulated by the providence or the central government?

One of the most intriguing roster issues entering camp is whether either Kulich or Savoie, or both, make the roster. If both shine in camp, then what do you do?

There is no need for a swan song. Everyone has different opinions and perspectives. That's just the nature of the setting. It's well known that you and I have very different views on the goalie situation and how the organization has handled it this offseason. That's okay. On this issue we diverge and other issues we are in accord. Very often, it's more productive from a growth standpoint to considers views that are at variance than in accord. It helps to widen one's perspective, or at least consider another perspective. There's no popular demand for anything. When one gets in the ring one gets hit. Sometimes it's fair and sometimes it is not. That's the nature of the environment.

I appreciate your observations. Maybe I should have used the word frequently instead of unceasingly. There is a notion that is being promoted that the GM appears to be oblivious to our goalie situation. I don't believe that to be the case. He's made a judgment for now that doesn't satisfy many here. That's understandable and okay. What I've tried to suggest is that when one considers the "real" options that were available regarding the goalie position, they weren't as appealing, at least to the GM, as many would like to believe.

You keep saying he "should have done this" and he "could have done that". What I'm saying, and you are refusing to acknowledge, is that for a number of reasons those proposed deals that you find appealing couldn't be done. The fantasy trade "context" that your vivid imagination has concocted is a fun sport on bulletin boards. But in the real world of trades and free agency where contracts, term and asset costs are considered a deal that made sense for this team at this time could not be worked out. At least, from our GM's perspective. You act as if the GM is clueless in recognizing the talent he has on his team. I'm confident that he knows what the assets and liabilities of his players are. The issue then becomes what are the replacement costs if there are options in the marketplace. He's made a judgment that is contrary to your judgment. He's concluded that the timing and situation right now aren't favorable to make a deal for an upgrade to the position. That doesn't mean that the situation won't change later. For now, I'll take his judgment over yours. That's the real-world context that the GM is living in comparison to your "fantasy world" context that you unceasingly shout about.

How do you know it hasn't improved? Levi will be better than the goalies we started the season with last year. His end of the season short stint indicates that. If you think otherwise, then why do you think so? Comrie was hurt for much of the season. Can he be a capable backup? I don't know. But I'm not writing him off. There is an assumption by many that UPL is a bust. If you want to write him off, then go ahead. I'm not. He needs to come into camp in better shape (slimmer and quicker) and compete for the backup spot. You are making assumptions and then declaring them to be facts. I don't see it in the declarative manner that you do. You and many others confidently state that there were better options in net this offseason. Marty Biron has on more than a few occasions gone through the number of possible of options to bring in. When the options were more closely examined the end result was that they were unappealing for a number of reason that we have already enumerated. Your point about context on this topic is very murky and is of your own creation. I'm simply not buying the context you are peddling. Again, when going through the goalie options that existed, the one's available were mostly unappealing for a number of reasons.

You assumed condescension when there wasn't any intended. There was a segment on WGR that reviewed the goalie options that were available this offseason. The conclusion was that when reviewing the options and factoring in contracts, who wanted to come here, the cost in assets etc. the realistic options were very limited for the GM. That's the reality that overshadows all the "should have done" this or that talk. What you consider to be plausible is actually very improbable.

It was pointed out to you by @Porous Five Hole that it couldn't be done because he filed for arbitration. What you wanted to do and what you were allowed to do are in conflict. What fantasy goalie did you want the GM to pursue?

I'm just focusing on the depth issue that you brought up. I see it differently. There is no question that the Sabres were fortunate on the injury front compared to most teams. Odds are that our good fortune will not continue at that level. (I'm hoping that the Quinn injury isn't a bad omen.) However, as our talent base has increased, the roster has accumulated more talented players who are capable of moving up the lines and defensive pairings without much diminishment in effectiveness. Mitts, a third line player, was bumped up to the first line when Tage was hurt. The line continued to play at a high level. If Joki gets bumped down to the third pairing and then is moved up to the second pairing due to an injury, he has already demonstrated that he could play as a second pairing player. The same versatility applies to Samuelsson, Clifton and Johnson. In general, this roster will be much more versatile than it has been in a long time.

A couple of reasons why the Sabres should be better next season. The Sabres home record last year was17-20-4. It's not unreasonable to believe that they can be 22-15-4 or better next year. The Sabres road record last year was 25-13-5. I don't expect it to be as good next year. When the Sabres had 15,000 fans or more their record was 13-9-3. I expect the attendance to be better next season with higher fan expectations. As it has already been mentioned, our PK should be much better with the additions of Johnson and Clifton. And I expect better structure on the PK unit because more emphasis will be placed on it by the coaches. https://www.buffalohockeybeat.com/why-did-the-sabres-have-such-a-poor-home-record-in-buffalo/

Interesting. I just think that the coach will go more with a Samuelsson/Dahlin pairing. I see Johnson's major value will be on the PK and end of game critical minutes. We'll see. What's apparent is that there will be a lot of flexibility in the lineup and in-game adjustments.

The roster you envision is very plausible. However, the one pairing that you list that I don't think will materialize is the Dahlin/Johnson pairing. Dahlin is obviously a heavy-duty minute player and will continue to be. Erik Johnson is a 35 year-old player who will also probably be on the PK. At this stage of his career I don't expect him to accumulate a lot of minutes per game. And that is what will happen if paired with Dahlin. My guess is that Dahlin will continue to be paired with Samuelsson and Johnson paired with Joki if he is bumped down a pairing.

Just curious because I simply don't know. How many offer-sheets have the Sabres given over the last five years? I can't recall of any. And if you know I would appreciate it: On average, how many offer-sheets are given per year are made in the league?