JohnC

Right now, he is by far the best goalie at our disposal. As I said in the prior post if Tokarski would have played in yesterday's game the Sabres would have been overwhelmed. We both agree on the need for an upgrade at that critical position. Looking back, I don't understand the GM's reluctance to re-sign Ullmakr, even if it wasn't at the GM's preferred price. The Sabres were dramatically under the cap to the point that it took on an expensive contract for a player that it had no interest in bringing in other than to use the contract to meet the cap floor.

I'm more aligned to your view than not. Players aren't weaklings. If Drury was so oppressively demanding and didn't apply his standards to himself, his teammates wouldn't have tolerated him. The locker room is composed a lot of personalities and intrigues. It can sometimes be fractious and sometimes fully unified. The locker room identity for one team is not the same for all teams. When you have a mixture of personalities and egos it usually works out to some acceptable accommodation. That's how it usually works in all workplace settings.

I agree. However, we don't have that caliber of goalie right now. The reality is 90% of the teams don't have that caliber of goalie. And let's not forget that Anderson played very well for us during the game. His brutal shootout performance shouldn't cloud how well he actually played in this game. The problem with Anderson is that he is a 40 yr old goalie who is not capable of being a workhorse goalie. I believe (opinion) if Anderson were able to be a workhorse goalie for us this season and play most of the games assigned to Tokarski, this team would have garnered at least 12 more points. That wouldn't put us in the playoff picture but it sure would put this team and season in a much better light, and a more promising light for the near future. Recognizing that some of the young prospects in our pipeline are near ready to move up, you can see the roster pieces falling into place. The challenge is addressing the goalie position. At a minimum the GM has to bring in another goalie, even if only as a stopgap player, in order to allow this team to be consistently competitive. That's one of the biggest challenges for the GM this offseason.

I thought the Sabres played well. As @SwampD noted Hellebuyck was the difference in this game. He doesn't get caught out of position and always seems to square up to the shooter. I was really impressed by him. Anderson had a good game but his shootout performance was brutal. If Tokarski would have been in net Winnepeg would have stampeded by us. The Asplund/Mitts/Olofsson line is starting to gel as a line. Mitts is becoming one of our best on the wall battlers for the puck. Skinner created some good chances for himself but Hellebuyck prevailed. Kudos to Girgs for scoring two goals. Eakin attracts a lot of criticism here but he fills a critical need in taking the draws in our end. The Sabres have earned points in seven consecutive games. Hellebuyck demonstrated what exceptional goalie play can do for a team.

Well stated commentary. It just seems to me that the GM and DG are in sync in what the rebuild strategy is and the type of room they want to have. And your point that the GM wants to construct a roster that is capable of earning the respect of the frustrated fans is insightful. KA has often stated the notion of the team reflecting the ethos of the community. And he is backing up that lofty notion by his personnel moves. Evander Kane is certainly not the type of player/person that he wants in the room. (I'm not intending to smear him but he is not the type of guy he wants influencing the youngsters.) That notion of a team reflecting the values of the community is easy to verbalize. The challenge is to implement that value system with the players you bring in. What has happened with previous Sabre administrations is that they opted for the quick fix short cut instead of staying true to a more meaningful long term plan that in reality set this franchise back. When the Pegulas first bought the team they thought they could make a splash and quickly become a prominent team. That was like chasing fools' gold. Substance usually trumps style. And it is much more sustaining.

The GM's job, by its nature, requires the person to know what is going on both on the ice and in the locker room. When the situation becomes so visibly untenable, he would be a blubbering incompetent not to recognize what was going on. The GM formally, and informally, keeps in contact with the players and staff. In this case it would be difficult not to realize what was going on. The challenge for the GM was how to present the situation to the owner so that he would approve of the remedy.

You didn't need a mole to understand the disaster that was unfolding right in front of everyone.

I understand your view and perspective. However, I disagree agree with it. All you can ask any coach is to maximize the talent he has to work with. No question that he has done that. He took a number of players who were playing substantially below their talent level (ex. Dahlin, Skinner and Mitts etc) and put them in a position to succeed. What more can you ask of him? There is certainly more to do and evaluate him on. As the talent level rises the expectations will increase. As it should. As it stands, he has done a marvelous job, at least in my opinion.

He has said it on numerous occasions that last offseason when there were a number of coaching vacancies he had no interest in applying for any of them. He stated that the only head coaching job that he wanted was the Buffalo job. I'm not sure if it was KA who put DG on Krueger's staff. If KA was responsible for adding him to the staff, and then elevating him after the firing of Krueger, he deserves a lot of credit.

Attached is a link from Sabres.com. Within the link is a 6 min post game interview by Granato (lower right hand corner). The coach is terrific at summarizing the game and players. I thought the comments by Tage post game about the team and its attitude were interesting. If someone already posted the link I apologize for the redundancy. https://www.nhl.com/sabres/

I didn't read all the posts that were made about the game. I was commenting on my observation that is consistent with what you noticed.

The biggest positive takeaway from this game was the play of Olofsson. He seems to have confidence back in his shot. And on top of that he is playing a much more well-rounded game. Getting him back to his sniping play is like adding another good player to the roster. Those who believe he should be dealt are misguided. He adds value to this roster. The general takeaway after watching this game is that this team doesn't quit when it gets behind. In this case although they were significantly behind they just kept at it. This is a mentally strong cast of players. There were a lot of big plays in this game. One of the biggest was a pass from Mitts ??? to Tuch for his tying goal at the end of the game. I believe the Sabres have earned points in six consecutive games. The tide has turned!

Even with an infusion of talent next year Carolina, Tampa, Pittsburgh, healthy Vegas and Rangers will still be ahead of us in the talent pecking order.

The Levi signing issue was talked about on WGR with Paul Hamilton. There are complications to signing him right away. If you sign him now do you then assign him to Rochester where UPL is playing? Do you assign him to Buffalo for a short stint and jump him ahead of UPL who should be next in line for the NHL? The simplest and maybe the best approach for the Sabres is to sign him to a contract a little later on (assuming he leaves college) and start him off in Rochester next season. If Levi decides to stay in school another year it wouldn't be the worst thing for the player or the organization. I still believe that he will leave college this year and go pro. Whatever he decides I'm fine with it.

Go to Logan at 9 PM and then sleep on the plastic chairs. What's the problem? Can't you overcome some adversity and discomfort? Think positively! You will be the first in line to check in for your flight. 🛌

There is another way at looking at this OT issue and how it is scored/rewarded and interpreted. On the positive side you finished with a tie in regulation. And then the second act follows where you lose. What it comes down to is that you get a point for the tie, and the winning team gets the extra point for the win in the post regulation time. I'm aware that a lot of the traditionalists are upset with the OT and shoot out scoring. I'm not one of them.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2022/03/25/man-punches-southwest-employee-hartsfield-jackson-airport-meade-hln-mxp-vpx.hln

The Sabres have gotten points in five consecutive games. That in itself is progress and something to be happy about. And within the same season it seems that this team has recently made noticeable strides. It's certainly not a fluke due to a favorable schedule. We are keeping up with some of the better teams in the league both at home and on the road. As @dudacekhas often noted Dahlin is consistently playing like one of the best defensemen in the league. He makes plays that most blueliners in the league aren't capable of making, and he seems to do it with ease. He's a special player and a joy to watch. He's been good all season long but it seems that after his all-star appearance he has raised his performance to another level. Right now Samuelsson is our second best blueliner. He's consistently good. His pass to Asplund for his rare score was exceptional. Power will be a much needed addition to the defensive corps when he joins the team. It seems to me that Tuch's play has dropped. He's not playing poorly but he's not the same player that he was a number of games ago. Maybe other teams are giving the top line more attention? I thought that Tage and Tuch were below par in this game. Okposo has been our most consistent player this season. Skinner was at fault for the too many players on the ice. It was an atypical lazy play for him. This Granato coached team exhibits a lot of character. This is not a weak-minded team that can't handle adversity. When they are behind they keep playing their game. I strongly believe that if the front office smartly handles the offseason and with the addition of some of our top prospects this team should be battling for a playoff spot next season. It would be a challenge to do but it is doable.

I don't know what Levi's intentions are but I'm sure he would want 1st round money. He would be a fool not to expect it. And I'm sure that the Sabres would have no problem giving him first round money because he is a player they targeted in a major deal. And based on his play this year he has more than met their high expectations of him. Levi has had a whirlwind year. He was involved in a major trade, had a sterling college year, participated in the Olympics and then without much of a break played in the college tournament. It wouldn't be surprising to want to take a little break (as you noted) to rest and map out the next stage of his hockey career. It's my opinion that he is going to soon sign a pro contract with the Sabres. From a hockey career and financial standpoint it makes a lot of sense.

Just think that he paid for the disciplinary service and she is the one having the most fun. I wonder what the going rate was?

You make an interesting observation about the GM and the trade for Levi. KA targeted Levi in the Reinhart trade that included Florida's next year's pick, a probable low first round pick. In the trading of Risto and Jack the GM got good value. At the time of the Reinhart deal, especially in comparison to the return on Risto, it seemed that the Sabres got shortchanged. Now it wouldn't be surprising that the acquisition of Levi might be the most consequential of those deals. It seems that our GM is invested in Levi. And as you point out that is telling.

Luongo was his primary mentor. Levi is a smart kid and is aware of the business of hockey. He will do what is in his best interest. From the outside it would seem to be signing a pro contract as soon as possible and get the clock running on his entry level contract. In the end, he will do what he feels is in his best interest. Odds are that he will sign a pro contract sooner than later. Just my opinion.

Of course, I'm disappointed in not getting the win. However, @SwampD has a perfectly pitched response/sensation about this game that I have, and suspect most of us have. The Sabres were a little raggedy in this game compared to the previous games but that had a lot to do with the quality of the opposition. We matched them in effort and opportunities. The missed shot by Olofsson at the end when the net was open was excruciating. But let's not forget that the Capitals also missed on some golden opportunities. If I were handling out starts to our side I would give the first star to Skinner. He got two goals and would have had one or two more goals if it weren't for the exceptional stops of the opposition's goalie. My second star would have gone to Tokarski. Although he was brutal in the SO he kept us in the game. I'm a coach Granato fan. If anyone wants to get a good perspective on this game and his team watch his postgame comments. He knows where his team is at and where it is going.

He was up with the NHL team. He got hurt and then went to Rochester. The organization decided to keep him there. In the last offseason after they weren't able to sign Ullmark it went and signed a 40 yr old goalie on a minimum contract. What does that tell you? It tells me that it felt it had a goalie prospect close to being ready to move up to the NHL. If you interpret their actions differently regarding the position, then that's fine. In my prior post, I stated what Granato said on WGR. He stated that he felt that UPLat this stage could develop as much in the NHL as in the AHL. That's what he said. How he is currently being handled is how they want him to be handled. There is no iron clad approach to this player or any player for that matter. The organization alters its approach as the situation changes and how they see fit. And it should be noted that on WGR Granato said that Quinn was playing at a level above the AHL. He stated that he felt that his development curve would be better served in the NHL than in the AHL. Quinn is currently playing in the AHL.