JohnC

No. I use the cheap stuff on my sandwiches. 🤡

The reason why I lean toward my position is that when he reviews what blueline players the Sabres have on the roster and within the system, there is no question that he can have an opportunity to play here sooner than with any other team. Like you, I'm speculating.

I've said this before so excuse me for the repetition: When he becomes a free agent and is able to scan the whole market there won't be a better situation for him from a playing time standpoint and opportunity to be on an upswinging team. In addition, if you look at this team's style of play the emphasis is on skating, a talent that he excels at. There is a need and fit. Odds are that Portillo won't be here while Johnson will be.

I remember a time when KA was on WGR and was asked why he didn't re-sign Ullmark. He said that he and his staff placed a value on the player and weren't willing to go beyond the contract boundaries that they set. He pointed out that this franchise has gotten into a cap bind because it didn't have the discipline and fortitude to say no. He made the point that there will be players that they want to keep but based on how the operation was now going to function they won't be able to keep or pursue some players on the market because of the cost to value ratio. If you look at the contracts that have been given to Tage, Sameulsson and Cozens, these can't be categorized as outsized deals (like the Skinner deal) .They could better be described as fair-value deals. If you look at our free agent pickups such as Lyubushkin and Comrie they fall within the value approach to signing players. If you include the Jost pickup all these (ancillary) players are smart and cost-effective additions. My general point is that this franchise is being run more smartly and analytically.

There is no battle of wits. Do what you want to do. It's as simple as that. The world will continue to spin in its orbit.

Within this link is a 20 min segment with Shayna Goldman on Sabres Live talking about possible trades. It is rapid fire thoughts on possible trades. https://www.audacy.com/wgr550/hosts/sabres-live

I won't toot my horn. I will simply look over and pass you by. 🍷

Kyle O sounds as if he has front office potential when he decides to hang it up.

So are attitudes and perspectives. If you can't handle the arduous trip then wait a little longer and get on that bandwagon. It may be a little late but it's better than riding in the wagon when traveling over bumpy roads. To each their own! 🍷

I hope you are feeling better. Maybe another win Saturday will give you a boost.

Look back a couple of years ago during the dark Krueger era and consider where we are now. What a dramatic change! I went from tuning out and almost fully apathetic to now getting up in the middle of the night to turning on my computer to get the west coast score. It wasn't that long ago that the Sabres were unwatchable. Regardless of a win or loss there was little entertainment value. Now, the Sabres, although certainly not one of the best teams in the league, are one of the most entertaining teams in the league. There is a lot of discussion about the long and torturous road to travel in a rebuild. But as much as many of us complain about the excruciating process, the turnaround has been fairly short. KA took over and not only reshuffled the roster by trading away its old core, and he also completely rebuilt the organization from top to bottom. That's a lot of completed work in a short time span. I'm not going to be foolish enough to declare that the Sabres will make the playoffs this year. What I can say is that I'm very optimistic that the Sabres will be in playoff contention right up to the end of the season. That in itself is an accomplishment. Without a doubt going up is better than going down, and it is certainly better than being stuck in the muck of extended mediocrity.

As you seem to be alluding to the delivery of the product is rapidly changing. From a business and a financial standpoint it's a more competitive and complicated business world. As soon as things seem to sort itself out and stabilize then a new technology is introduced that alters the market again. The only constant is constant change. You either adapt or wither away.

No, they yell chickmate. 🤡

Do chickens strut? I know roosters do but I haven't seen a chicken do the arrogant walk.

Few people have forgotten the pre-Granato days. Mention the name Krueger and you will immediately get a deluge of scathing comments. There is no question that Granato is one of the best developmental coaches for young players. That's step one as a Sabre coach. The next step in evaluating him is his ability to coach a team that becomes a serious cup contending team. The Sabres are not close to being at that stage yet. When he gets the Sabres to that next level then I will argue on his behalf that he is one of the best coaches in the league. I'm definitely a fan of DG. When it comes to the discussion that @dudacekhas proposed, I'm not going there yet.

The business model for sports networks and cable TV is rapidly changing. The upcoming generation has to a great extent cut the cable chord. Those involved in signing regional cabel sports deals not so long ago expected the audience and money flow to consistently increase. What we thought was a new business/media model has quickly become antiquated. The new technology has altered the market. Now the market has to adapt to that change.

This thread has become a slapping competition.

You gave a well-reasoned and thoughtful response. However, I still strenuously disagree with you. The one aspect that both Vegas and Seattle had as expansion teams compared to what other rebuilding teams undergo is a clean slate (roster). That's a critical difference/advantage that conventionally rebuilding teams don't have. Even if rebuilding teams want to dramatically rework their rosters, they have to contend contracts that are already committed. The goalie argument is something that we have discussed for a long time. There were goalies that we targeted last offseason. Some of them simply didn't want to play here. (Ullmark is somewhat of a different situation but not altogether different. Consistently losing is not an enticing appeal when pursuing players.) That unappealing situation also applied to defensemen on the market. Just because you want a particular player that doesn't mean that the player wants to come here. Who can blame players who have other options find the Sabres to be an unappealing destination. I see that that situation changing now. The Sabres are mostly rebuilding from within. It's the right approach. It's working out reasonably well. From my perspective the Sabres are a year ahead of where I thought they would be. Although not completely satisfied, I'm tepidly happy where this team is, and where it is going. Stay the course!

To the NHL's credit it created an expansion system where if new organizations are judicious with their scouting and procurement from available player pool, unprotected players, they should be able to be competitive right away. Vegas is the hallmark for that approach. That is a far different system that rebuilding teams such as Buffalo, Detroit, Jersey, Ottawa etc. have to contend with. While Vegas and Seattle can be immediately competitive with their new roster construction, the menu of players that conventionally rebuilding teams have to choose from is not available to them. It's comparing apples to oranges.

Within this WGR link is a 14 minute segment with Don Granato. In it he explained his reasoning to split up the lines. He said it was a way to refresh the original lines, or as he put it to disassemble in order to reassemble them. He is enjoyable to listen to because he answers the questions without the typical inane coach speak. He talked about Quinn and how highly he regards him. He has high expectations for him. He also discussed the impact that an extended break has when a team gets back to play. Good hockey talk. https://www.audacy.com/wgr550/authors/howard-and-jeremy-show

The metric I'm most interested in is the RECORD! When you say the other team stinks when your own team has essentially the same record, you are, if you are applying your own logic, saying your team stinks! As it currently stands, Detroit and Buffalo are in the same strata. If one team stinks---so does the other. Listen to @Thornyon this subject. He's being logical and you are not.

Listen to @Thorny. Check the standings. Why do you say Detroit is trash? They have the same number of points in the same number of games as we do.

That loose type of play is not playoff type of hockey. And it is not a style of play that works against superior and more disciplined teams.

Marty Biron is one of the better hockey analysts in the NHL. Don't let his congenial personality hide his substantive knowledge of the league. The one area that Mary is qualified to speak to is the goalie position. If you get a chance, go back to yesterday's morning appearance on WGR where he talks about Levi. To put it mildly, he is a believer in Levi. He's effusive in his praise of his quickness and ability to analyze the play in front of him.

I watched the first period and saw the clips this morning so I can't fairly say I had a feel for the whole game. From what I saw I thought Jost played well. It seems that putting players on the Girgs/Okposo line results in the player elevating their game. The Jost acquisition was a sneaky good pickup. The pass from Quinn to Krebs for his score was superb. He worked hard to get the puck and then had the vision to find the player who was in space to get off a quality shot. Quinn is going to be a prime player for us. Krebs is gaining confidence and is asserting himself. The return on the Jack trade with Tuch and Krebs here looks better and better as time passes. The Mitts chorus of critics should be silenced for the rest of the season. Just from watching highlights I saw the Sabres give up a number of odd rushes. This is a troubling trend. A win is a win. I can't say that the Sabres will make the playoffs but they definitely can stay in the race up to the end.