Zamboni

Simply red seriously. This is rather silly.

Intangibles .....

Optimistic time ... 4 - 2 Sabres. Skinner, Reinhart, or Joker with a goal

With the deep thinking going on with reincarnation and such .... which I think similar thought too ... I then contemplate ghosts or spirits and that whole realm. Good spirits, bad spirits, loved ones spirits, spirits of total strangers etc ... a few directions to go in to explain that phenomenon.

Um .... what?

https://26shirts.com/products/buffalo-vol-7-shirt-7-the-buffalonian-baby-buffaloda Those that like The Mandalorian mixed with a Buffalo....

Hmmm I never soaked em. try another batch the same way, but try to roiling boil and bake them. See if there’s a difference. One plus about it is it takes less time. Perhaps it softens them up or brings out a different flavor. edit: after looking at a handful of recipes. I guess boiling removes any bitterness the tempeh may have. Plus softens it up better. try another batch sometime soon and report back I would be interested to hear your experience with boiling and preparing that way versus just soaking.

Yea I bake em. Not pan fry em in butter or oil. Little healthier lol. However, the “healthier” idea goes out the window a little bit when I make the sauce with 1/2 cup Franks red hot and 2 tbsp. Melted butter. Lol. Tempeh, I rolling boil the 10 “wings” for 12-15 mins. Remove from water and let cool. Coating, I dip the cooled down wings in milk or soy milk, then flour/seasonings mixture, then brief redip in milk, then coat well in (Italian seasonings) Panko bread crumbs. Set on slightly oiled/sprayed baking sheet. Cook at 400° for 10 mins. Flip wings and cook for 8-10 mins. toss the wings in sauce. Pig out.

I make those often. Buffalo wing flavoring. I have a pretty good recipe that’s easy to do.

I just started the watching Fargo the tv series, just one episode so far... wow it’s really good!

First off ... most WGR callers are clueless cromagnoms who call to hear themselves on the radio, then call their friends to say “hey did you hear me on the radio?” They rarely make valid logical well thought out points and just spew emotion filled rants based on that moment in time. They often think in a vacuum. Secondly, This opinion I’ve held for a few years now. And I’ve heard it all trying to convince me to be harsher in my opinion. Pegulas have their faults. No doubt. Don’t like everything about their ownership. I’ve also liked a lot of what they’ve done. And I’m old enough to remember all the owners of the Sabres. For me the best was the Knoxes. Next is Pegulas. Then Golisano. Then the Regas family. I don’t technically consider the NHL as owners. More like stewards until they could find an owner. People can pick apart all the things they want and take the easy well traveled road of negativity. It’s those that can also recognize and mention the good things that ownership has done. Those are the people I respect and listen to their opinions on both negative and positive. And no, I’m not gonna list all the good things or bad things I think the Pegulas have done. It would be an exercise in futility. I’d be changing no ones mind. These forums rarely do when one is clearly dug in and doesn’t want to actually debate with an open mind.

https://www.diebytheblade.com/2020/1/24/21080093/buffalo-sabres-mailbag-botterill-cozens-free-agency-trades-and-more interesting little section.... I told you we’d get to Reinhart later. I don’t believe discussions have begun yet on a new deal. That’ll probably start in the summer. My feeling is Reinhart will cost the Sabres between $6.8 to $7.25 million in annual average value (cap hit). He’s an arbitration-eligible restricted free agent on pace for close to 70 points, which would be a career-high again. Like him or not, that is the going rate for a player that produces at his level. I’ve always looked at the William Nylander deal ($6.97 million cap hit) with the Toronto Maple Leafs as the ballpark for Reinhart and his agency. Some people have discussed the idea of using Reinhart as a trade chip and I’m not there at all. The Sabres need more impact forwards not less. Trading Reinhart in a package for another forward seems counter-productive. I’m also not saying he’s untouchable, but for me, it would have to be a really sweet deal to move him off the roster. I feel like he provides more than what is measured in terms of production that the Sabres can’t afford to part with right now. I’d be in favor of moving him onto another line to give him a chance to drive his own line as the general manager has previously alluded to. I think it would help spread out the scoring and they can explore this when they get healthy at forward. If the Sabres don’t take him off Eichel’s like that isn’t a deal-breaker for me. A lot of good players play with other good players. Top lines all over the league consist of more than one good player on that line. It’s not a knock against him. Eichel and Reinhart do things in their game to benefit each other. Granted, Die by the blade isn’t the best at writing, objective thinking and are embraced as gospel by some casual fans more than it should ... But some of the points are pretty fair regarding Reinhart. His salary (although I think it may go higher) projection is close.

#23 Jimmy Lambert https://mgoblue.com/sports/mens-ice-hockey/roster

Sad sad news.

The wise move (because we’ve all seen this movie before) is to be cautiously optimistic with Cozens. IF he makes the team in October. IF he isn’t put on the top six for most of the 20-21 season. IF he is developed wisely. He’ll be a nice effective addition to the roster That’s not rushing him. That’s not expecting him to be some sort of savior or answer to the 2C hole next season. It will be interesting to see what fans have realistic vs. unrealistic expectations of a 19 year old rookie.

I don’t waste my time with that abomination. It’s like not even hockey. Why do people still watch it? I mean seriously. Why?

I can picture Ullmark or Hutton doing that ?

The term, “Put a nail in my coffin,” to describe performing some self-destructive act first appeared in print in 1789 in Peter Pindar’s Ode no. 15 as “Care to our coffin adds a nail.” This was repeated through the years and coffin nails as slang for cigarettes appeared in the 1880s, 20 years before they were called “weeds,” and 40 years before they were called “butts.” In the early 20th century, the Anti-Cigarette League announced that every cigarette smoked was a nail in one’s coffin. However, the first use of the phrase may have come from Australia when it was recorded in 1910, but O. Henry wrote “Have you a coffin nail?” in his “The Higher Abdication,” 1907.

https://www.diebytheblade.com/2020/1/23/21078068/the-buffalo-sabres-have-become-second-rate An article mixed with bloviating, and dramatic conclusions and assumptions. But also has some cold hard truth in there as well. Kind of hit piece meets somewhere in the middle with somber facts.

Excellent work diving into that and finding that out. I’ve done that several times and once in awhile discover that type of thing you did. It’s pretty wild how much money some things differ depending on who’s selling.

I’m sorry ... I love those rolls! We buy packs of those often. Everyone has their tastes.