Zamboni

You had me shaking my head in agreement … until the last sentence. Jack will absolutely not be a part of the “new” Sabres going forward. That ship has sailed. Bon Voyage Jack. Jack will however, be a part of putting up 2-3 points every time he goes against the Sabres 😂 I can see that happening…

Agree. Yet some eat it up hook line and sinker. There’s a difference between being interested in Eichel. And being interested in Eichel if the asking price was reasonable in their eyes. Comments “leaked” for public consumption are suspect at best.

All? Not quite. Most? Ok yea. And the vast vast majority of fans didn’t like the cap hit for Skinner when it was announced. And now it’s safe to say no one except Skinner and his family like his cap hit.

Seth Jones is roughly half as talented or skilled as pre-injury Eichel. Now? Who knows.

UPL isn’t ready for prime time IMO. He needs to marinate in the AHL for at least a full season. Maybe maybe get him into 3-5 NHL games, but that’s it.

So after all the back and forth. The thread title is just clickbait sensationalism. Is that what I’m gathering here? Not accurate at all. Kinda silly huh?

https://www.whycenter.com/why-is-jack-a-nickname-for-john/ https://www.knowswhy.com/why-is-jack-a-nickname-for-john/ https://www.reddit.com/r/answers/comments/atqstr/why_is_jack_a_nickname_for_john/

Is it just me, or does it seem more “sensationalism” or “tabloid” garbage gets posted more often in the past few months than ever before. I don’t know. There used to be more attention to “consider the source” steps taken before people posted stuff. I mean things still slipped thru, but not nearly as often. And not just sports or this forum. It’s pervasive like everywhere.

Woah! Poor truck. Yikes …

Woof woof If it’s even accurate … IF

And I’m the exact opposite. I don’t “know” any true men who would be so crass and inconsiderate to their family. Different circles I guess. As far as Kane goes, I think roughly 60-70% of what comes out for public consumption is probably true. There’s most likely some embellishment, some lies, and things never known as well.

I like the words I like the idea I like the direction just put it all to action… 👍🏼

And everyone can do their part by repeating themselves several times or saying the same thing in a different way at least 10 times over the course of the next few weeks. And we should have no problem getting to 300 pages. 😂

I think you both disagree on what a “need spine surgery ASAP” PPE center is worth. I personally want as much as KA can squeeze out of a GM before Eichel’s NMC kicks in.

At this point, I couldn’t care less what he did as a player. He’s a coach. Hopefully a good development coach. Get the next wave ready for the NHL. And help create a winning culture.

Well, he does have …. Chemistry good for Danny

Yes

True. But there are attorneys who know the precise language and nuance of this situation or ones very similar. And then there are ones who have no knowledge of this kind of scenario. and then there are those who act like they know, but are just guessing like the rest of us knuckle draggers 😂

The Rob Ray one I’ve seen. It’s good. But the Jagr Mogilny one, I haven’t. Would love to see that gem!

Well, it certainly isn’t 80m anymore 😂

I think that description is a little off. At 24 I wouldn’t call him “young” anymore. In hockey years. “beat someone’s ass” makes it sound like he’s a proven “tough guy”. I think a better way to say it is … on occasion he’s not against dropping the gloves with someone near his weight class. I don’t think he would drop the gloves every game, (not that it’s needed) or drop the gloves with the Reaves, or Wilson’s of the league. I’d like to see Borgen back in the mix, but anything richer than a 5th, is too much IMO.

So he’s backing up UPL? Is that the assumed plan?

Someone needs to ask a very well versed lawyer on what the Sabres can and can not do. If Eichel disregards his contractual obligation he signed. My ignorant guess, is the Sabres can legally fully void his (remaining) contract the day after a player has a surgery without the teams full consent/agreement. They don’t need to “wait and see if the surgery was successful” in order to void the contract.

9th? Really! Yikes. Yea he may be waived.