Jump to content

Pimlach

Members
  • Posts

    22,313
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    The Hockey Battlefield

Recent Profile Visitors

20,036 profile views

Pimlach's Achievements

Hall of Famer

Hall of Famer (8/8)

17.3k

Reputation

  1. Lindy would have lost the challenge and you know it. Why get worked up? they won. Go argue about the missed icing on the first Edmonton goal if you want a winnable argument. And yes, the rules are different when a goalie is outside the paint with less protection than if he is in the blue paint. Contact is allowed outside the paint unless it is ruled to be intentional, avoidable, or overly forceful - all judgement calls. Just touching a goalie who is in the blue paint is often called interference.
  2. The Edmonton goal to start the third was icing. That goal should have come off the board. Edmonton shot it into the Sabres end but never got to the red line. It was obvious to all except the linesmen, even the Edmonton announcer saw it. I guess you can’t challenge icing? They also blew an icing call on the Sabres at the end of the 2nd, two Sabres were beating the Edmonton player back and the linesmen blew an early whistle. Toronto blew the hand pass. The puck hits the back of Tuch’s glove while his hand is on the stick - that cannot be a hand pass.
  3. Lindy would have challenged and lost. The Edmonton announcer said Lyon left the blue paint on his own, so no interference. 😂 The NHL makes it up as they go. A puck randomly hits the back of Tuch’s glove before a goal, it must be a hand pass. Winning In OT was fun. 2 points accomplished, Edmonton gets a loser point but they are out of conference so no big deal.
  4. One second. Unbelievable. An OT win seems like too much to ask for
  5. He just missed a holding penalty on Edmonton
  6. How is that a hold, the guy has the puck?
  7. Edmonton announcers saying Lyon froze and should have cover the puck.
×
×
  • Create New...