Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    38,372
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. This is only because you haven’t given me ample enough time to piss you off yet
  2. Hockey isn’t really about who you play, it’s when you play them. The top teams lose all the time, so I don’t really buy that excuse at all. I do however buy the idea you can’t predict the overall acumen of the team based on 2 games, therefore agree that as far as playoffs goes, the only thing that matters here is the 4 lost points
  3. FTFY, hopefully
  4. You know, I hadn’t really thought about it but…..GMGPT has a nice ring to it. That’s a good idea, they should try hiring it
  5. Sabres actually carried the balance of the play game 1 (somewhat due to score effects) but then got rolled in game 2. Tbh, for me it IS the losses and not how they happened. I’m sort of done with analyzing results beyond: “what were the results?” the team not only doesn’t deserve anything beyond that, it’s proven folly, anyways. The common denominator has been Ls regardless of what led to them, for years. It just doesn’t matter. Win or don’t. It’s year 5. Make the playoffs or don’t. Already drew a personal line
  6. lol THE Buffalo Sabres
  7. Right right that makes sense
  8. Walrus guy? lol
  9. It’s been an exceptional mlb playoffs so far
  10. Because things were extremely heated at the time. You must remember that. I believe it was the Friedman interview. Eichel going out of his way to give Kevyn Adams credit during an extremely contentious time with the team pointed the finger extremely clearly, imo, at the guy above Adams You have to think about why he would single out Adams. What he’s trying to say by not saying it.
  11. Plus, how important is a winning environment in Buffalo to the development of all the young players currently on the roster? Those players trying to get their career started and established on the proper foot? If Levi provides non-negligible value in this area, it probably makes the decision to keep him up a no-brainer I’d settle for sight, outright
  12. That’s fair. Willful prisoners of the moment. as for the bold: same bat time..
  13. Remember when Jack Eichel commended Kevyn Adams for taking a swing at 2021? There’s your smoking gun You have to read between the lines a bit, but it’s right there. He’s praising the GM and the most telling aspect was that he chose to do so. What does that create a contrast between? Weird, I used the term before I read your post. Great minds
  14. It’s a good post. I just despise the incorporated logic of choice
  15. Ya, unless Levi would still be readily available for NHL starts and I’m not sure that’s feasible - I’ve just heard people hint at him going to and fro from Rochester. You are right about the most teams thing. I think much of the angst is driven by how bad SandStorm seems to be. As mentioned, I’m not torpedoing Adams here until the results are bad. Presumably he could grab someone better than Storm if Levi or UPL goes down the 3 headed monster could have been an option, I guess, if they just completely parked Reimer until he was due to start. From what I’ve heard from folks like Jake Allen - it wreaks havoc on all three splitting starts but if Reimer literally wasn’t getting any and was just a failsafe, I suppose that idea could have worked. I think Brawndo comes down somewhere around there given his “better be sure” comment up thread
  16. They say a team takes on the personality of it’s GM..
  17. No you do need a second guy in today’s nhl
  18. Maybe not for you, but this place 180’d their projections of playoffs based on 1 game. People somehow had the confidence to predict playoffs, a bold prediction given available data, yet whatever metrics they used that gave them the confidence to make such a prediction seemingly evaporated based on 1 solitary game, or two. I would frankly be shocked if 2 straight wins here didn’t do the exact opposite. People go from one extreme to the other, why would we expect different? Half the reason the losses get so low is because people are convincing themselves we are cup bound after pre season wins. 99.9% of the “if only THIS had gone better” analysis we do is shell-game frivolity. You are ALWAYS what your record says. You don’t get a more accurate, predictive mathematical result by shrinking the data you are parsing. The most likely result BY FAR this season is that the Sabres will win a lot of games, and they will lose a lot, people will yo-yo between “we back” and “we suck” for 6 months, when in reality merely looking at the standings at the end would provide one with a more accurate analysis than everything else put together
  19. Not JJ. That’s interesting
  20. We should remember we are, what, a two game win streak in the next 2 games from feeling the season is saved? Hold those horses just a little, sabrespace
×
×
  • Create New...