Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    38,347
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. Funnily enough, this is kinda why we lead the league in goals yet are below .500 - they are definitely front-runners
  2. They actually haven’t won when scoring 3 or less. So still on track for a breaker Olofsson looks better away from Casey Quinn made a really nice pass for apple Cozens another good game
  3. I like all this and especially the bold. Maybe it was rocky for a bit but after these last two, trying years, our viewpoints are aligning right up now for next season, and going forward it seems
  4. Please see edit
  5. So what’s your expectation for next season? Or, more to the point, what do you feel their expectation should be?
  6. Ya, no. It’s the plan’s 3rd year next year. It’s time to win. If they aren’t actually winning games by the third year, said plan is lacking. You cannot tell me with the forwards we have the expectation for next year shouldn’t be playoffs. Half the teams make it. It’s time for that to be the goal. You are absolutely correct it should be results driven. This year, our result is pacing to be the same as last. Improvement is required - - - Im not saying they HAVE to make it, there’s a distinction there. I can live with not making it if that’s the goal and they fall short. But they need to internally be preaching playoffs not outwardly preaching development year, like they’ve been reasonably honest in communicating this year. We might not make it, if it’s the goal, but if it’s not the goal we DEFINITELY won’t. All I said is that if they enter into the year again with oodles of cap space and again preaching development as the priority focus, it won’t fly for this fan. Regardless, from all outside reports, Adams has realized it’s time to supplement now
  7. Bumbles Badly is such a good nickname
  8. There’s that thread thats lying in its title, ya Granted, the stat I mentioned includes “3”, it entails 3 or less goals. Which is why it’s so crazy imo, you should win games occasionally when scoring 3.
  9. As long as he gets back in and gets a good, definitive run of games this season, for better or worse. He plays well, and proves he can at least be a back-up, great. He plays poorly or mediocre, we can look to improve this offseason. Absolute worst would be him never getting into enough action this year for Adams to feel like he was properly evaluated ie pencilling Comrie in for an evaluation year next season. They need to be much more certain heading into next season on the state of their goaltending, assuming playoffs are the goal
  10. Daredevil....ya Though Colin Farrell was un ironically great in that Loved the town. You are right, he’s a great director
  11. Honestly, this. “Development year” in a GM’s 4th would probably break me.
  12. Biggest thing is changing the Conn Smythe trophy to someone else in light of the comments he directed at Herb Carnegie ”In 1938, Carnegie caught the eye of Toronto Maple Leafs owner Conn Smythe, who allegedly said that he would take Carnegie “tomorrow” if he could “turn him white.” According to The Canadian Encyclopedia, another version of the story has Smythe saying he would pay $10,000 to anyone who could turn Carnegie white.” https://www.sportsnet.ca/longform/inside-fight-get-herb-carnegie-hockey-hall-fame/ Not saying we need to erase Smythe from the history books - but naming the most important trophy in hockey, for an individual, after him is a pretty big “Why?!” to me.
  13. Sabres are 0-11-1 when scoring 3 or less goals this season. What a wild stat. It’s super positive in a way because there’s clear runway for improvement, but also a massive indictment on the goaltending approach
  14. Marek today was talking about the work Sakic did in Colorado, how he inherited a lot of the high end talent there, but his work was in manipulating the group into what it is, buoyed by savvy, moneyball-esque free agent pickups. He said one of Sakic’s biggest things was that you should never turn down the opportunity to improve your team, no matter how small, considering the difference between winning and losing at this level can be razor thin. Reminded me of the work Adams is doing, to a large extent. Not claiming Reilly, for example, seems to fly in the face of the “anything to improve” thing, but the reconfiguration of the asset base into a worthy sum of its parts sounds like what he’s doing/attempting.
  15. Literally mixed this up in my mind with “Gone Girl” lol so disregard my deleted post if you read it. maybe the titles and the fact affleck is involved in both. Gone Baby Gone was excellent. Gone Girl was actually pretty good too. Have you seen Argo?
  16. Love me some Shinsuke
  17. Fair enough. We aren’t that far apart on it. The hindsight thing is true to an extent, that’s why I always like to base it on a reasonable time period. It’s hard to hold a gm accountable for any 1 move or lack thereof, without knowing all the context. This is why it’s better to say, to expect an addressing of the position over a reasonable time frame- ie in the end results must be expected as that’s the job, and that while any 1 move has a hindsight component, it would defy logic to suggest one avenue for success couldn’t have been found and completed over the course of the full time frame.
  18. Bolded worries me a tad. Believe it’s something @Taro T has touched on, too
  19. Was already on it lol
  20. No, you can’t just throw in Ullmark to configure a post that seeks to literally let Adams off the hook for failing to find a goalie in 3 years. As if that covers it. No one else possible, right? Adams clearly should have beaten Boston’s offer for Ullmark, or locked him up to a deal in the months and months they were negotiating prior to Boston joining the fray, PARTICULARLY if the landscape to address GT is as barren as you say. Being honest, I do buy the argument that KA did the best he could coming into this season. But we aren’t going to sit here and pretend he wouldn’t want a mulligan on Ullmark, he would. Adams, considering it’s now a 3 season period, is responsible for the results in net, full stop, and not merely responsible for giving it a good effort He’s done great in other areas
  21. Even worse
  22. Yet you still, like me, undoubtedly looked up the proper spelling of his name. You have respect for the history of the game. And the various turds who have played it.
×
×
  • Create New...