Thorny

UPL made some key saves though to keep this in reach

Uhm

5 points out of the next 10 very likely wouldn’t have us “there” in the 7th seed with it being ours to lose going forward in that Pittsburgh is already ahead based on points % for that spot and we’d probably lose ground. It would keep us within striking distance, if that’s what you mean. But I wouldn’t say it’s ours to lose. I do agree 8th is ours to lose as things stand: if we play at the exact pace we’ve already established over a large sample size, over the games we have remaining, we’d finish 8th if all others did the same. 5/10 points could still have us in 8th by %, ya

I’m more of a Storage Wars kinda guy

My phone doesn’t load the .webp format, sorry, have mentioned this to B. Nill before who posts those constantly. If you act it out in charades I’ll try and guess

They take advantage of the system because they need to. If Stone was healthy enough to play, he’d play. Im not saying they aren’t taking advantage of the system that allows them to, im saying they aren’t stupid enough to choose willfully putting a player (THEIR BEST PLAYER) on IR who doesn’t need to be over the scenario where he remains in the lineup

Are you pulling my leg? Stone is good to go, he’d normally be suiting up, but is agreeing to sit out the remaining 25% of the season while the team is fighting for positioning, even though they missed while doing that last year. Stone is just good with *wink wink nudge nudge* “take a seat for now”, just the least interested guy in competitiveness and helping his team

So you think he’s healthy enough to play that they took him out of the lineup last year, to scheme, missed the playoffs, and are setting out with the same game plan again

They aren’t putting Stone on IR to scheme the system. So, bad luck, not 4D chess - - - I love the connotation of “Vegas needs to try SOMETHING! zero 20 goal scorers! We have 5!!!” remind me again where Vegas sits in their conference. One can approach this site with the utmost pro Sabres bias and it still makes me chuckle haha. It’s endearing.

This is my recollection as well, that the Sabres prioritized Drury when Briere was there for the taking. Even had they got it done with Drury, they chose the wrong player anyways

Probably gotta try and find a way to use that Stone money somehow this season so I agree a trade is imminent. One of the best teams in the league and winners of 5 straight since the break - no good sitting on the 9 mil if Stone can’t play. Dude does seem to always get hurt. Shame as he’s one of their central figures if not THE central figure there Another saving grace is making the playoffs all but 1 year and sitting first in the West right now, but what do I know.

This isn’t what I’m talking about though. I already said I think GMs factor in position pretty early ie sooner allow for it to be the deciding factor Im talking about the frequent refrain you see that we/teams must select the guy with the most talent, full stop, calls for “BPA!” and then the contrasting “what would we ever do though if we had a great F in Beniers! Could you imagine?” I mean ya, I can imagine. Can you not plausibly have seen Adams himself identify Beniers as the best player there? Would we have been doomed if we did? If you tout BPA, presumably that person would be ok with the situation where we’d need to swing a deal. You’d have to think those situations would arise under the strategy

Damn too bad, shoulda gone the other way: that charts indicating Power is as good as Karlsson right now indicate there’s a problem with the charts

Would be looking to swing a trade. That’s why they say BPA, right? Beniers is NOT better or significantly better imo cause as people are saying points aren’t everything, but if he WAS, we would have had to take him, right? thats the core principle of bpa theoretically we’d trust our GM to make a prospect trade if necessary. That’s the theory of bpa, anyways, which I always find interesting. Personally I think teams factor in position more than they say, regardless of what they say, due to the potential difficulty of finding deals

Ya, if Dahlin is the guy getting more points he’s almost always going to be the guy getting more votes. regardless, the thought of 2/3 on the ballot being Sabres is wild intriguing

No, but each province has its own holiday today here in Manitoba it’s Louis Riel (lol) day

Eichel and Dahlin draft hype? Coulda woulda shoulda

I’m not sure it’s much of a novelty as much as the stat is literally saying we’ve been better in the games we’ve played than the other teams fighting for 8th. What it’s saying is that the most significant reason we are not literally in 8th is simply because we’ve played less games, ie something beyond our control I don’t know how it can be construed as getting hopes up, it’s just a fact It’s not even an underlying metric

iM tRyInG tO rEAD aBoUT lEvI wUt iS wItH aLl tHE uPl tAlK?!!11111

Yes, Hasek would have a great sv% with this team are you joking?

Who’s tweet is this? Probably soaked in irony given Dahlin’s rookie season was better and the author probably among those who lambasted him a couple years later Do you think he gets a nomination?

We’ll have to start calling them “Backs“ instead of defensemen

When you catch The Dark Knight on tv randomly. Channel isn’t changing.

Adams should do it for a “ favour”. the only true currency in the shady underground world of nhl GMing

Nothing against Dahlin I’m just not sure he’d make a good forward