Thorny

I’ve heard it’s more like a drop after 2. Misa and the defender a level above. Hagens production considering the team he is on is I’ve heard underwhelming

Makar is absolutely on another level, it’s sort of shocking looking at the D scoring leaders, even. He’s in his own tier, right now. But I don’t see anyone else definitively between him and Dahlin. Dahlin and Hughes would top the next tier, to me. And I’d say they are at superstar level, tbh.

And when the sun shines it will shine out the clearer.

Sabres will be on a back to back, 3 in 4 days on the road stretch when I see them on Sunday live, here. absolute ass Nearly every time they come up here. This is the secret to the jets success

With Montreal pacing for 89 points, Sabres still have a point in their back pocket to play with

Dahlin with the stick smash. Things still different?

Tage REALLY wants 40

Adams masterclass

Our Stanley cup will be if Ottawa misses the playoffs

It’s so good (when fresh) Big Mac no cheese. Quarter pound BLT. Whopper. Chicken buddy burger.

The what

win today, win our game in hand, mere 9 points back (with a likely Habs loss today) two 6-1 stretches to wrap up after that and we are in

*that wasn’t what the post I responded to was talking about* I am severely struggling to see what you are missing here It’s actually very possible for me to take issue with deals being refused due to analysis of timeline and be ok with a pick not moved because of reasons due to lack of return I reiterate: we should not be avoiding the dealing of any prospective asset due to our stage of build if it is incredibly important to you to explain that no one will offer a reasonable return, anyways: again, so be it. I have no opinion on that

Then so be it. But I wasn’t arguing with this future argument I didn’t know you were going to make. Again - my issue was with the idea it should be ruled out due to where we are at re: stage of build.

Point was made smartly on twitter that there’s no real issue with deal but also no reason to do it so soon: ie they don’t care about opportunity cost, as the tweet explained. I agree with the tweet’s conclusion that it likely means we won’t be doing much. Would repost but it’s protected. Have you SEEN our last 10?? We almost have to (…we do we prop these guys up..)

I don’t watch enough of the current game to conjure up answers I’d be happy taking my time defending when pressed, without doing research right now I don’t want to. If some scenarios were presented though im sure I could pick between them / find out about where my line is

I don’t need to tell you anything - my viewpoint wasn’t the one disregarding a particular option on its face. The straw man arguments while a fun distraction ultimately go no where - of course im not advocating for trading it for an unworthy return. Why would I? point I disagreed with was in fact the pigeonholed strategy. It ruled out trading a “top 5 pick” due to the “stage we are at” bogus. Should only be return based. my point was that it shouldn’t be ruled out. You’ll need to ask him do do the math on why we can know, already, someone CAN’T offer a worthy return

People can’t even commit to the bit. “Oh ya ya fire Adams! Sell the team! Youngest team in hockey again! Losers…. …Top 5 pickz? No im banking that for the future.”

Nonsense. “This stage of construction.” Kevyn Adams, is that you? Field a freaking playoff team. It’s a year-over-year endeavour.

Like if the cutoff drops to 86 today, it wouldn’t take a miracle for it to be 84 at the end. The Sabres going 12-4 isn’t near-impossible. Like we are still in “very unlikely” territory but it’s not out of reach the playoffs are coming TO us, it’s so funny we likely don’t grab them this year

They’ll probably make it if they go 14-2 Rangers and Habs are both losing today

Rest of season I’d assume