Thorny

The Connor Clifton game ^

“Oh yeah? We have a Dahlin..”

DAHLIN is a god

One thing you notice in person is Dahlin subtly shaking his head at some of the plays he sees his teammates make from behind the play Reimer has been excellent

Saw Matt Ellis in concourse lol

lets gooooooo Hostile environment

And we’d merely then be two ships passing in the night

YOUR Buffalo Sabres are scheduled to arrive in Winnipeg shortly, after carpooling from Minnesota early this morning to save $. History of late hasn’t been as nasty to the Sabres while playing in Winnipeg as one might think: Sabres have taken 3 of the last 5 matchups. Today’s tilt being a back-to-back, and the 3rd game in 4 days, will represent tough sledding, however. On a personal note, I had not witnessed a Sabres victory live in person until this fateful, magical day: and tracksuit night, to boot: Go Sabres!

Yes I struggle with interpreting things too literally

Right but that’s the saying “if ANYONE is so and so”. My point is that he’s definitely included in the engine of the team, there’s more in that very sentence, can’t leave out the rest of the context: “him + Mack” are what I deemed the engine - more than one guy. To me it’s a two headed monster as the focal point

What part?

I wouldn’t say he’s consensus at all, I think it’s up for debate but yes the analytical sabres community on X is heavily, heavily favouring Misa so like I said if we somehow got first and passed there’d be some level of a meltdown I don’t see Schaefer pumped up as a good option for the sabres specifically very many places but here. Elsewhere seems to attribute relevance to the fact we have no drafted top 10 F besides Quinn and passing on a F there would be sort of ludicrous when we’d have a shot at that top level guy and a playmaker to boot or they take a left shot D man and shoulder Adams with the responsibility of making a good trade, a hugely important foundational trade, for Power while other teams know he has to make the trade and can hardball him That would be the other option and a great situation I’m sure

We will take it. 5-4. OT

Can’t get to the spot where more than one player drives the engine of a team in perception? The only way to actually build a hockey team properly? You are too buffaloed we have been here so, so many times. One player doesn’t carry a team. Makar is firmly, firmly among the guys there elevating the whole. “Well I’d like to see him away from a good team”. Why? You’d have to eliminate the competence surrounding every player you’d want to compare them to, too. “Well I’d really need to see him on a team like Buffalo who doesn’t surround their players properly” is what that sounds like. ”call me crazy, but I’d love to see McDavid without Draisaitl on his team” “call me crazy - but I’d love to see Gretzky on a team without multiple hall of time all time players.” Oh, he failed to win a cup without them? Might be something there…looking into it

He’ll go first if we select there

It’s time we finally settle this. Centre ice, during the timbit intermission

Sabres back at it tomorrow

With his 41st assist Dahlin’s total is now the second highest of his career (58, 22/23)

Pray for mojo

I have interest in winning sometime this century. We can trade Power but it has to be for an equal now return. Doubt that happens when it’s a) adams b) selling drastically low on the asset. Draft a guy at 1 and move him during growing pains absurdly dumb unless someone pays what we would have asked 2 years ago Do not sell low. I implore you

Honestly they may really be saving it for tomorrow lmao I can hope

Don’t throw out the baby

Too soon

I have heard that stat that in very large numbers a consensus is very unusually wrong say ask the audience on millionaire: if it gets above a majority it’s almost *always* right just the nature of mathematics if there’s enough random/wrong options I think law of averages splits up the “wrong” answers evenly the correct answer rises to the top almost inevitably

Oh he’s not joking