Thorny

The new one was so good, too

Because I admitted he’s likely back? It’s hard to read it any other way I’ve never maintained he WILL get fired merely that should

Adams re-signed 2 players, and did a substantial core shakeup. Not only is he almost assuredly back next year, he might feel he’s almost done for the summer

I do. I mean look at the C depth. im not saying it won’t or can’t be good. Is that a “we are assuredly breaking a 14 drought” F group, through? Surely that’s the line when we are flirting with that sort of accomplishment

The organization pays me very little

Peterka - Kulich - Tuch Benson - Norris - Thompson ??? it’s too early to map this out but maybe that’s the stylistic fit they see …it’s a lot of youth. And a lot of question marks at C

I preferred when the mystic intangibles remained exactly that. Rather than given a name and counted on specifically Our addition by subtraction is off the chart. Not even master Yoda has a count that high

Who are the other 3 that make up the top 6 then? Already granted Kulich.. the top 6 doesn’t promote confidence at this time

Sounds like a trigger man for a team with a depth of play drivers whoops

Thompson Tuch on line 1 you mean? Ya possibly wouldn’t really like look of all left shot Norris line though.

I’m losing track of the amount of times this has been uttered when does the addition come?

Peterka - Thompson - Kulich Greenway - Norris - Tuch ..good? Is there a stylistic fit here? it’s lacking playmaking. Peterka and Tuch I suppose

Cozens was one of the few players on this team I sorta liked so that aspect is a downer

If we run a Tage - Norris 1/2 c unit the playmaking will need to come from the wings in

Just a poor match with Tage

Yep, happening both ways

Such a good point he’s dealing the guy he overpaid

He’s fine. The trade is fine. It’s probably the biggest move we see before puck drops 25-26

Dahlin?

The trade makes sense imo. It just falls into the categories, for me of A) too late b) too little: re - doing anything to mitigate my opinion of the GM a shake up type trade is wise, on its face

Sabres were the only team ok with giving him the surgery The opposite

No one said it was literally nothing but by all means run with a narrative I’ve corrected twice

We aren’t spending to cap so extra cap is irrelevant to them

I will say it being a hockey trade makes sense, we shouldn’t be trading for picks. It would have had to look like a steal to me, though, for my positive feelings re: the deal to be strong enough to outweigh the disappointment this deal represents in terms of what it likely foretells for Adams’ future