Jump to content

Thorner

Members
  • Posts

    37,717
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorner

  1. Florida has now blown the lead. That part is over. They may actually get a mental boost from being past that, in a weird way. Facing elimination will add the fear of god they haven’t had. Don’t count them out Edmonton, maybe they really will pull it off. I was touting them coming in. Should be a great game 7
  2. It could also be Canucks Blackhawks 2011
  3. McDavid pointless. Dude folds
  4. Two sweetest words in sports
  5. He’s probably thinking about how fun these two deep runs were compared to golfing
  6. People should maybe just stop making predictions, nah? No one has been right yet lol
  7. The offside rule went in because of this - - - if it’s inconclusive upon replay at *real speed* call on ice should stand
  8. The offside replay system is so dumb. 5 minutes for something imperceivable to the naked eye
  9. Oh my gosh If it’s taking this long it’s a goal
  10. Both him and McDavid were Smythe favorites but McDavid maintained/elevated in the final and Bob has declined
  11. I think I’d credit the oilers more. Except for Bobrovsky - he’s been disappointing Game 7 could honestly go either way though. A lot will come down to first goal If it gets there
  12. With what like a 6 team league on an unfairly advantaged Habs team? McDavid is better than Harvey
  13. His sheer dominance over the others of his era gives him a bye right to the top 10 imo i think he’s the “best” to ever do it but yes, in terms of greatness I think he’s got a ways to go to catch the top guys but he’d be flirting with ~5-6 imo with a win here
  14. Shorsey is about as accurate a depiction as it is to say Canadians are maple syrup swigging igloo dwelling yokels who only say eh
  15. Where do you rank McDavid all time If they win the cup? Top 5? To me, I still have Sid ahead due to the 3 cups, but I bet you I’d be in the minority
  16. I know you want to frame Skinner as “those who think he has value” and “those who aren’t deluded or naive” but that’s not accurate - - - Sure, re: Casey. My point though was that he had a pretty good playoffs - we already know that
  17. I did, you can lean on this because you don’t have anything coherent to say but easier just to take the L 9 points in 11 games isn’t Jack sh*t Their captain said otherwise as did the stats
  18. I know but you asked what was controversial presumably re: the perception of others and he laid it out
  19. It’s not my fault the barometer you chose for your argument was “Jack-sh*t.”
  20. This is the part of what PA was talking about that I get
  21. It’s not just casuals. A massive factor is also where your priorities are for next season
  22. He literally explained this tho
  23. 9 points in 11 games and MacKinnon said he was their best player after the Jets series. Ok
  24. Krebs to Philly for future considerations: there’s your addition by subtraction
×
×
  • Create New...