Jump to content

Thorner

Members
  • Posts

    37,698
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorner

  1. Craig Button thinks that? This, more than anything Adams has done over the last week, gives me real hope we are going to make the playoffs next year
  2. His character (and demise) was exceptional in TLJ. All time iconic SW scene. Somehow captured that hair-on-the-back-of-your-neck-standing up thrill of ESB for a new audience, with the shot of Rey grabbing the Saber. 9 was what derailed it all. But the reference in regard to the post was clear. Pegula / Emperor
  3. If we are a hockey team in the nhl, hot, but I’d bet he gets the full year before being fired. if we are on an internal cap, im not sure his job is in jeopardy as he may be handpicked with both under the full knowledge they are playing by different rules
  4. The 3C is more likely I’d say, surprised early results say otherwise. 40/60 on a top 7 addition
  5. This is very well said. Your points about the 4th line sort of brought home to me it’s tough to put TOO much stock in the improvement we’ll get there, when we literally, of course, improved the line that plays the least on the team. We didn’t just “happen” to need the players easiest to get. 4th line improvement was sort of the expected focus after elsewhere was addressed. I mean ideally we’d be bumping down players TO the 4th line, not spending assets on filling it out from afar The additions there ARE good. But there range of affect on the outcome isn’t that substantial relative to other areas that needing addressing Even the bottom 6 itself.. its weakest spot is the most important role: 3C
  6. The forwards needed help when we had Casey. They definitely needed help + once we moved him. I do think we are at the ~ the same place with the forwards re: amount of help needed as when the season ended Adding another good forward is sort of the bare mimimim. That replaces Casey Then you are relaying on internal improvement and the identity swap of line 4 (plus Byram). We’d really need a Casey replacement, and another forward, to improve on the F unit we entered into last season with
  7. Thanks I hate it
  8. Honestly - I know arguing is what we all do for fun but forest through the trees on this: I think we’d all agree that the fact it’s even a debate if we are improved *at all* is enough of a sticking point, considering the OUTRIGHT improvement we deemed necessary at the *very least* coming in we might be a bit better or maybe a bit worse, but this was supposed to be, from KA’s own admission, a big offseason doesn’t jive he’s failing or failed or there’s more still coming and it’ll lead to success. Who knows, but it’s worrisome
  9. If it needed to happen, what do you think of KA offering him a deal? Do you think it was good judgment?
  10. A tragedy of circumstance lol there were lots of issues with covid that could be deemed tragedies but certainly not that they were WRONG about bridging Reinhart during Covid. It would have paid off. Other players were paid. Other teams paid players. You dismiss the variable of choice wantonly And clearly the risk of NOT paying Ullmark was greater. What team has been burned by Ullmark so far besides us?
  11. It’s definitely this
  12. Definitely disagree. Mucks it up, draws calls. Scores goals? I mean, he scores dirty goals in close. His D stinks but that can be masked And Hall and Eichel played 19 games together
  13. It is optically funny but I do still really like the bottom 6 additions we’ve seen so far can’t rule out another move quite yet
  14. It’s hard to say if it does, but if an internal cap exists, Adams is essentially an extension of Terry and you are right, it would all stem from him and we’d likely need a change at the very top and down to find success
  15. I’m on record as not wanting to buy out Skinner, but Casey still stings more currently for whatever reason Hoping for a big year from Byram. We need it!
  16. Dunno how much stock you put in these numbers but
  17. Scorer is ambiguous goals or points?
  18. Oh man does this ever write itself…almost comically so
  19. This board rules, though these days will always be fun hockey wise because of it
  20. There’s like 4 of 5 suggestions in here for how simply removing one of our better players in Skinner might make us better that, while grasping at straws, definitely represent more creative thinking than we’ve seen from Adams in 5 years lol
  21. Lots of what Adams said today just seems utterly awful, he’s so hard to listen to. But I won’t judge the book by that putrid cover: I still think his moves look good if we get the one key addition, at least. You can smell his presser from here, but if he adds the guys he adds the guys. We’ll see how the rest of the week goes mixed bag so far
  22. Looks more less like the moves of retaining a playoff spot
  23. Hard to say. Bit worse on O but better on D prob. Sort of a status quo overall so far with a shift in the means slightly
×
×
  • Create New...