Thorner

It eats away at the 8 mil we had for next year a bit, ya. But realistically the contract is a function of / evidence of the fact we don’t need that cap space this year + next ie don’t intent to use it. We gave Krebs the extra because we simply could Adams for one thing doesn’t seem concerned the dollars of his guys lining up with performance so much as whatever pre determined cap structure he’s figured out: saw it with Cozens and Samuelsson etc

“Krebsy” says hi

Kevyn Adams!

Playoff proof

That’s a lot of money for a 13th F, and when looking at comparables This is sort of just what the Sabres do.

I didn’t even realize it was a hard K sound at the end of his name until this preseason

If you can’t beat ‘em, “take care” of them Mustafar waits..

Par for the course re: my usual content

Hopefully this tradition stays in the past along with the tradition of missing the playoffs whenever that happy time comes to pass a joke being killed due to overuse is a thing. Never mind drastic overuse lol There hasn’t been an original “M W” in about 5 years haha

My gosh if we aren’t done with evaluation years at this point I need to evaluate my life choices the kids shouldn’t be under the impression spots are available. They should be under the impression a spot can be taken against the will of the incumbent getting this team ready to go, game 1, is absolutely the priority.

Excellent

We care, in a message board sense

Just some food for thought: Since the days when Pat Lafontiane skated for the Sabres in 1995, the team has had a total of 7 player seasons of 80+ points. 7 in 30 years. We’ve made the playoffs 9 times in that stretch. The last time a player as young as Quinn had 80, we have to go back to 2018/19 and Jack Eichel. Before him, to find the last player to be 23 or younger in a sabres sweeter and reach 80 we’d have to go back to Alexander Mogilny in 1992-1993. Since Pat: Briere, Vanek / Roy, Pominville / Eichel / Thompson, Tuch If Quinn does reach 80, it’ll be a Sabres season for the ages relatively. I’m here for it

I don’t really blame Krebs for asking for a bit more but in reality he’ll have to sign his QO, soundly defeat the likes of Aube-Kubel and Kulich for a roster spot, and have a good year on a balanced sabres team in earning a bigger deal next time. All of which are reasonable possibilities

I feel like Quinn could be a Reinhart with better pure athletic ability Not this season but reasonably soon That great hockey sense, the ability to win battles in a seemingly endless number of ways, the correlation with the ability to deflect the puck in close..I mention Mark Stone a lot but but that’s sort of how I see Reinhart too, but without as much of that raw ability that I believe Quinn has - - - I see him headed for something around 60 points this year But I mean if he has 60 goals by midway through I wouldn’t be shocked

You called me a d*ck unprompted, out of nowhere, and now you are just rambling Frankly you should have gotten a warning - - - The irony of you saying the place is full of “trash posters” (it isn’t), and apparently im the jerk U be posting unhinged. In honesty, you post as if you consider your content to be elevated from the pack, but in reality it’s not standing out in a positive way the Jeff Skinner of posters

Wasnt at all, but ok lol. But since you asked for it: Your endless posting about how Quinn is going to be “better than what everyone else but me” thinks is incredibly redundant. But more importantly see-though: you want to come back with some big “See? See! I called it!” when he comes back with a great season, and no one is picking up what you are putting down lol. Everyone thinks he’s really good: you aren’t ahead of the curve

Who is he going to shock? The 13 out of 14 who voted he’d have *at least* a solid top 6 season? Everyone thinks he’s awesome I guess MJD will be shocked

Baker has never met a prospect he didn’t like. I said that to him on Twitter once and he blocked me haha Random tangent, just thought it was kinda funny

Exactly

No, we don’t know. Ask 10 to post what the bottom 6 configuration is. Are all the answers going to be identical? Who’s is correct? Just yours? We don’t know, at all, that 4C would be a “waste” for Kulich, when we don’t know who he’d ultimately line up with and how the line might be used I’m not saying Kulich WILL be at 4C, I’m just not sure how well “he isn’t going to be there, move along” serves any discussion or conversation

We don’t even know what it is yet, though. Everyone is just assuming the additions are going where they think they are. @dudacekhas done an admirable job all summer suggesting that there are actually lots of different ways the lines may be configured

I’d play him at 4C, why not? Lindy does the 4 lines thing, right? I feel like he could work well with someone like Malenstyn. And could move up lineup if proving capable. I mean, it’s a prospects challenge game, we can draw almost nothing from it in the macro (already see people on twitter saying we’ve solved our top 6 addition problem lol) but we knew Kulich was already knocking on the door and dominating in a game he should dominate, as a pro, only reinforces the idea he’s ready for a real shot Peterka - Thompson - Tuch Benson - Cozens - Quinn Zucker - McLeod - Greenway Malenstyn - Kulich - Lafferty