Thorny

“No, Terry won’t allow the team to spend at the level of others teams, therefore needlessly handcuffing our ability to make the playoffs, but he showed up in Roch for a game so I wouldn’t say he HATES the sabres”

I don’t think he’s apathetic, but I think the idea I have to argue why him caring, somewhat isn’t enough in the face of a 14 year drought is rather absurd The fact the discussion needs to be framed as if he cares, at all is the whole point. It’s the resilience I’m talking about There’s no level we won’t lower ourselves to. We will grant this team the lowest of bars

I’ve seen all the films and zero of the shows, had to try Andror because the praise is incessant. Onto episode 4

This

Obsessed with potential ceiling

But cash and caring are “I want to win, but only if I can do it cheaply” isn’t caring

It’s that easy, apparently

“We tried” (But they didn’t, because they handcuffed themselves with “under adams”) Dude please don’t fall for that

A higher career points per game in the playoffs than any current Sabre has in the regular season

No room in Buffalo for a guy who has 62 points in 68 playoff games

Great, kid! Don't get cocky

No reason to assume that in the hypothetical world where he plays 75 games? Sure he’s a legit 2C Ya I didn’t catch the player but they mentioned they had another C with injury concerns which is why Norris would be dicey for them specifically

Jets have 8 goals in their last 5 road playoffs games. Issues are well beyond Hellebuyck, who played well yesterday

The were talking about this on the fan hockey show. Led into talk about Pettersson, and the Canucks looking to deal him. Mentioned buffalo as a potential landing spot but they were saying the ship probably sailed for them w/the cozens deal ie Vancouver would trade EP for Cozens but Norris wouldn’t be enough, mainly due to injury concerns

Not the issue yesterday

Take the right lessons from things, too. For example, do you most commonly hear said, outside of sabres circles, that the sabres were justified in their medical stance on Eichel, just the medical side of things, or do you most often hear that the sabres screwed him over on the surgery front? Compare that with how you feel the sabres acted re: just their approach to the medical. it doesn’t really matter what happened, does it. Far more relevant where the sabres are concerned is the league wide perception: if you do not believe the sabres have suffered narratively league wide through the Eichel fiasco, up to and including potential agent and player opinions, you might be without internet and reading this on an abacus Lou is a respected man league wide. Very. The type of guy you want to be seen with. Infer what you want with that in combination with the lions share of my post above. But if you don’t want Lou, don’t complain, ever, about NMCs and players not wanting to come and “WCKAEHD??”

it’s the exact reason we are where we are

Make him the GM Guys it’s Kevyn Adams Don’t make me post the clip I’m posting it

But from a certain point of view (notably, that of a team that’s averaged 78 points for 5 years), they are

It’s not annoying at all. Frankly I sympathize greatly with it. This was me last summer with Skinner. I need to see an incredible argument to convince me the Buffalo Sabres are at a “just get rid of him” stage to see benefit, with pretty much *anyone*. The sabres are beyond little. its like in The Other Guys were he gives Will Ferrell’s character a flat wooden gun. I need to see this franchise not shoot itself in the foot with the most basic of tools before I trust their evaluations on much of anything

I don’t really like the Reinhart comp because Reinhart elevated Eichel demonstrably Skinner would be a better comp. Skinner very much played well next to Eichel, didn’t drag him down, Jack was phenomenal in utilizing him (rebounds).. As you know: I’m the one guy who isn’t throwing skinner out there as a negative. But it’s not wholly a positive. But I wanted to keep skinner. And I’d keep Byram too if we can get the right price and we can’t trade him for better Ya I mean once upon a time VO - Eichel - Skinner was the best ES possession line in hockey There was a stretch I remember it specifically

The key speaking only for me is that yes he’s been good with Dahlin but Dahlin hasn’t benefited. Players don’t seem to benefit from him. The best argument for him then is that he isn’t bringing Tage and Dahlin down. Ie he’s pliable enough that the good of Dahlin is able to course through him and we see it in his numbers. But D who play well with Dahlin aren’t that uncommon, in fact that’s the MAIN extra benefit of having a 1st overall like Dahlin. being good with good players is ok but it’s a far cry from being good with average players or even making good players better Which brings the contract into the conversation: we aren’t going to be able to pay him what he’s actually worth which I do know is an idea you are accounting for