Jump to content

Thorner

Members
  • Posts

    37,674
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorner

  1. I’d even be good with the Black Keys again
  2. I expect a win tbh, because we probably have to. This is an Event game. Tuch with a good game for sure: 1 G, 2A WOOOOs at the camera at the end
  3. “Laugh or Cry?” is the name of the new commercial-break fan cam segment
  4. Product on the ice? Our sad devotion to that ancient religion has not helped us conjure up entertainment value or given us clairvoyance enough to better understand the sport, in the way the scoreboard will
  5. The fact a team with a way better setup acted with more urgency than us in the offseason is the rub
  6. So the guy we had “no room for”, in Olofsson, owing to our air-tight forward ranks looks good on another team? Shocked, i say
  7. Apparently, the ability to torpedo the results of 12 games rather than 12 years
  8. What a great decision. Individual goal songs is so weird. Score and win as a team. Plus the majority of them sounded nothing at all like goal songs. Just keep it simple, something the crowd can jam to
  9. Two 60 point d-men would be rather absurd. It’s hard to see a situation where Joki is holding back the D core imo given that context If Tage is scoring 50, there’s going to be a lot of guys with a lot of assists, etc etc If Thompson hits 50, we have 2 60 point D men, and Kulich has 20: I’ll wager we are top 3 in conference If not higher
  10. Maybe, but upon quick perusal: there wasn’t a single NHL team last year with 2 of those 3 I’d imagine any two of: 50 goal scorer, 20 goal rookie scorer, and two 60 point D men (if power gets 60 Dahlin will) would essentially guarantee not only a spot but a high seeding
  11. I don’t think so. You don’t need a 50 goal scorer and a second 60 point D man to make the playoffs
  12. In order of likelihood most likely to least, I’ll guess: 1) Levi outperforms UPL 2) Sabres make playoffs - - - 3) Kulich 20 goals 4) Power 60 points 5) Tage 50 goals
  13. lol this is awesome My Dad, the reason I’m a fan, is the world’s biggest Dylan fan
  14. This is only because you haven’t given me ample enough time to piss you off yet
  15. Hockey isn’t really about who you play, it’s when you play them. The top teams lose all the time, so I don’t really buy that excuse at all. I do however buy the idea you can’t predict the overall acumen of the team based on 2 games, therefore agree that as far as playoffs goes, the only thing that matters here is the 4 lost points
  16. FTFY, hopefully
  17. You know, I hadn’t really thought about it but…..GMGPT has a nice ring to it. That’s a good idea, they should try hiring it
  18. Sabres actually carried the balance of the play game 1 (somewhat due to score effects) but then got rolled in game 2. Tbh, for me it IS the losses and not how they happened. I’m sort of done with analyzing results beyond: “what were the results?” the team not only doesn’t deserve anything beyond that, it’s proven folly, anyways. The common denominator has been Ls regardless of what led to them, for years. It just doesn’t matter. Win or don’t. It’s year 5. Make the playoffs or don’t. Already drew a personal line
  19. lol THE Buffalo Sabres
×
×
  • Create New...