Jump to content

Thorner

Members
  • Posts

    37,619
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorner

  1. Go Bombers. If we can manage to beat the rough riders today, we’ll be off to the final for a shot at the rough riders for the cup. Come on, 3-peat!
  2. Cousins outplayed him based on IQ and a weaker arm, injuries or not
  3. Cannot ask for a bigger break than that incomplete pass being called a catch. Lock it up in OT
  4. So turnarounds can be a little bit faster..
  5. “Another fun game” Haha
  6. Vikings are always fraudulent
  7. We’ve lost the plot if fans are being told to not be upset after 5 straight losses. The everything is always fine crowd takes it too far. It’s possible to remain optimistic overall but at the same time react to significantly poor results. There’s nothing wrong with a little balance No need to find yourself on a Team Stormcloud or Team Everything is Always Fine.
  8. You’ve taken my “if the only goal is the Cup, why watch?” to a comical extreme here. Only in Buffalo would we say “what’s the point?” if fun can only be found in *wins*. They really actually aren’t THAT hard to get. Like, 50/50 haha. Anyways, just teasing Probably a symptom of winning not being the very top priority
  9. Agree. They were looking ahead imo
  10. Agree Adams could have made the situation better and signed him when he first came aboard - Reinhart said as much. I believe those wishing to give KA the benefit of the doubt here say that, with all the covid stuff, the team wasn’t looking to offer a LT deal summer 2020 to Sam By the time summer 2021 was here, Sam made the decision for us
  11. Boneheaded. Probably assuming the Bills would assume they’d run on 4th after passing on 3rd and hoped to catch them off guard I guess. Out-smarted themselves
  12. Potential 14-point swing play calling decision botch by the Vikings, there. Gotta love that. - - - Kirk isn’t good
  13. Agree, and especially with no downside, don’t get why you don’t do it. It’s a weird trend
  14. alright time for ROTJ
  15. Would be kinda funny though if a team was within striking distance re: time remaining in game and scores required, yet kicked it deep thus sealing the game, when an onside was an option. would be a funny visual
  16. I think what PA was getting at more so is, what possible argument can you make for not doing it? what's the downside, if scoring two remains at least a reasonable possibility should you do so?
  17. it significantly increases the likelihood of event, both positive and negative. in a time-sensitive situation, that's a trade off you always take it's a time tested NHL strategy and if anything goaltenders are being pulled earlier and earlier based on the suggestion of the underlyings
  18. Ya, it's kinda odd. Everything they do at goalie, top down, is back asswords lately
  19. not nice falling below the 81 point bylsma pace still, their metrics (I know, I know) seem to indicate we shall rise above that but 5 losses is still 5 losses, and that's discouraging for a team that was 7-3 with a history of the old fast start and then collapse special. Next 10 shall be very interesting
  20. he'll challenge sooner than pulling the goalie
  21. atta boy Krebs. Yacking at Marchand you're definitely winning that battle
  22. gotta see at least some progress
  23. Tage Thompson has indeed become our new Eichel We give him about the same amount of secondary scoring support
×
×
  • Create New...