Jump to content

Thorner

Members
  • Posts

    37,697
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorner

  1. Well laaaa deeee daaa Mr Body Break over here
  2. McDonalds is so good. but honestly 10 bucks won’t even do you right there nowadays. Used to be a Big Mac meal (No cheese) and junior chicken under $10 alas they’ve also altered the Big Mac recipe over time and as of now it’s settled on something inferior, if I must say
  3. Whatever . we’d still wallup the 83 all stars
  4. Isn’t the Tage line getting dominated defensively by the ROR line? Which F line do we have that goes good against ROR? Needing D and G is well played, we also still need forwards, or the development of forwards. I say it again the talent level overall isn’t at THAT level yet I think our record is proportional ie Granato = good job
  5. Not in today’s nhl. We’ll need a Leafs breakdown though in addition to solid play on our end as the Leafs are a great defensive team. Or we need to be really good and really lucky, that also works
  6. It’s 1998 and the Sabres are in white! Crowd erupts for our goals, too!
  7. Love trivia. 2 time Harry Potter trivia contest winner actually. Once for The Office, too
  8. “Hey, did you see Will Smith is back on Twitter?”
  9. Correct me if I am wrong, this then means you believe Levi will be good enough next season to allow for winning playoff series to be a realistic goal? Of course, under the assumption we add the defensive additions you are referring to
  10. So with the proper (realistic) defensive supplementation, to your satisfaction, you believe we could realistically have hope of winning playoff series next year, with UPL between the pipes?
  11. You are on record saying the goal next year needs to be *winning* playoff series. In your estimation, can that be a realistically set goal, should we enter into next season with exactly the tenders we have now? Up to and including Levi?
  12. I think we have like 342 games in hand we’ll be “in it” for a while
  13. I honestly don’t think they do, yet. They are viewing it from a different perspective than we are: we are in different stages. They’ll get there, though
  14. Washington losing again lol. Silver lining
  15. Worst part is the Toronto media being able to continue being dismissive of the Sabres. Whatever. Well except Jeff Marek. He’s got our backs
  16. UPL made some key saves though to keep this in reach
  17. 5 points out of the next 10 very likely wouldn’t have us “there” in the 7th seed with it being ours to lose going forward in that Pittsburgh is already ahead based on points % for that spot and we’d probably lose ground. It would keep us within striking distance, if that’s what you mean. But I wouldn’t say it’s ours to lose. I do agree 8th is ours to lose as things stand: if we play at the exact pace we’ve already established over a large sample size, over the games we have remaining, we’d finish 8th if all others did the same. 5/10 points could still have us in 8th by %, ya
  18. I’m more of a Storage Wars kinda guy
  19. My phone doesn’t load the .webp format, sorry, have mentioned this to B. Nill before who posts those constantly. If you act it out in charades I’ll try and guess
  20. They take advantage of the system because they need to. If Stone was healthy enough to play, he’d play. Im not saying they aren’t taking advantage of the system that allows them to, im saying they aren’t stupid enough to choose willfully putting a player (THEIR BEST PLAYER) on IR who doesn’t need to be over the scenario where he remains in the lineup
  21. Are you pulling my leg? Stone is good to go, he’d normally be suiting up, but is agreeing to sit out the remaining 25% of the season while the team is fighting for positioning, even though they missed while doing that last year. Stone is just good with *wink wink nudge nudge* “take a seat for now”, just the least interested guy in competitiveness and helping his team
  22. So you think he’s healthy enough to play that they took him out of the lineup last year, to scheme, missed the playoffs, and are setting out with the same game plan again
  23. They aren’t putting Stone on IR to scheme the system. So, bad luck, not 4D chess - - - I love the connotation of “Vegas needs to try SOMETHING! zero 20 goal scorers! We have 5!!!” remind me again where Vegas sits in their conference. One can approach this site with the utmost pro Sabres bias and it still makes me chuckle haha. It’s endearing.
  24. This is my recollection as well, that the Sabres prioritized Drury when Briere was there for the taking. Even had they got it done with Drury, they chose the wrong player anyways
×
×
  • Create New...