Jump to content

Thorner

Members
  • Posts

    37,717
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorner

  1. Foiled again. ill try again next week
  2. Ok how about this: They said on TSN just now, framed as trivia, that the Sabres were the only NHL team to make no deal on either of the last 2 deadline days Trade a signal of priority change?
  3. Freudian slip! checkmate. Sorry, dems da rules
  4. Once the core has been accumulated, you mean Wait...you don’t?
  5. Because of Bryson, our short defenseman
  6. Semantics, but I don’t think many league players care that Asplund moved today. Frankly, a fairly large share probably don’t even know who Rasmus Asplund is. But again, semantics: the agents certainly pay attention
  7. Well what the hell is your letter grade for priskie/strand, then? Can’t give them all ranks but 1
  8. Well, good deadline day everyone. Fine posting all around. Three cheers, (hip-hip!), collect your loot bags on the way out.
  9. That’s an interesting dynamic then for sure
  10. Re: the defensive additions for next season? So the ramblings were true. Score one for the insiderzz and score 1 for KA not being purely interested in Saints
  11. Good inference though, here ^ If teams were asking for Savoie, we were “in” on some bigger fish
  12. The original Muel, ftr But unlikely. Franzen was a playoff beast
  13. Hagel was a great pick though! It’s not like he forced Botterill to hate CHL players Murray was a reasonable drafter imo
  14. You know how they say a car loses half it’s value once it’s driven off the lot? The Mystery Box always has a level of appeal. “Rasmus Asplund is Rasmus Asplund, but a draft pick could be anything! Even Rasmus Asplund!” This isn’t the logic KA used here but I’m using it to illustrate the fact that, often, draft picks have more value left unopened
  15. It should be noted that the biggest loss in this deal is @Doohickie’s meme KA, today ^
  16. I think so too, and this is pretty salient. He seemed to fall out of favour with DG, both teams probably trying to do that same thing, here. Both caught in a system non-preferable to their talents I think I was referring to Asplund as Larsson light last year
  17. My posts are roulette when it comes to that, eh? Lol yes jk. No.
  18. Good add
  19. KA should have held out for Future Considerations, imo
×
×
  • Create New...