Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    40,124
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. You might say Adams improved the team TOO much July 12th, man But we ditched Peterka. Forwards are better now, addition by subtraction. Could approach upwards of 350 goals. 375 with a healthy Norris Edit: forgot we swapped Lafferty for Danforth. We could scratch 400 goals
  2. Unironically yes The temptation to become desensitized to it is a prevalent, strong and natural process We shouldn’t turn our minds off to the true absurdity of it, nor remove it from it’s proper historical context that’s how they win: indifference
  3. Right but while Adams may bank on better luck on the injury front as a means to improvement i don’t personally find that to be a smart tact (and one should balance the injury playing field when comparing year over year, anyways) I get that’s not the mindset you’d have should you actually be responsible for building the club thankfully but tbh I don’t even feel comfortable projecting better overall health even as a thought exercise considering, as mentioned, injuries are a guaranteed part of every year. It’s been 3 seasons since neither of Dahlin or Tage missed at least 10 games, and Tuch nearly missed double digits that year team is break even at best on paper
  4. Team is maybe break even, never mind 4 extra wins
  5. You’d think so, wouldn’t you
  6. It’s past the point where one can deny they are a sucker for caring
  7. Being an NHLer insider literally the easiest gig lol most obvious statement ever
  8. Doing nothing far uglier
  9. Later prime for D men, and lasts longer. I’m sort of past wanting to formulate an argument, here, after all we’ve seen lately with high picks, don’t really need to take this fight up, but…Owen Power is going to be a really good player. It’s not that surprising people are tired of waiting on the development aspects Very much the Reinhart of D
  10. “The circumstances” are already afoot
  11. JUST long enough to claim inability to use cap space
  12. Wait hold on, so the Buffalo Sabres…..*actually aren’t* going to improve their hockey team? Every day when I get around to thinking about it it surprises me again. I refuse to let myself become desensitized to the otherworldly ineptitude of this team A shocking offseason thus far
  13. Yes I do think he could be the 2C on a team that qualifies for the playoffs Wouldn’t be my first choice but definitely possible
  14. I didn’t say Stanley Cup contending 2C But, as with any conversation re: Sabres, I thought it was implied that when I say he could hack it as a playoff 2C that it meant we could qualify to be a playoff team with him in that role apologies if that was unclear I’ll worry about the playoffs if we ever get there
  15. Well, ya Need a F sans injuries just to get back to break even. We need 2 sans injuries to improve upon a team that sat in last place most of the year
  16. People want to put hard line labels on them as if we don’t KNOW hockey is a free flowing back and forth game where one player, say, a superstar, can’t make all the difference on their own. We should know by now that roles are entirely dependant on all the pieces around them. you are right, McLeod isn’t definitively 2nd or 3rd line: he can be either
  17. He’ll prob be our best C in that scenario I think he could hack it as a playoff 2C if the depth was there and the top line wasn’t 2/3rds children and then Tage Peterka was a good playmaker too Something which we lack you are right we place a lot of focus on players who snipe
  18. Also, again, fantastic overall and in depth write up - - - The overall weakness of the F does stand out, partially could be due to the transition period as you say
  19. Great list. One caveat There’s a lot of games that say, “this guy isn’t an NHLer, period” re: Levi. Would always take otherworldly skill to be able to be a mainstay tender at his size and I’d say the likelihood he becomes a good nhl goalie at all is less than 50%. Ranking by nhl liklihood and not utter ceiling I’d bump him down a fair bit there are games where the reason he doesn’t stop the puck in Rochester is because the shooters are too good. If this is happening at the AHL level, at all, it bodes horribly for his prospects against nhl shooters who increasingly pick corners for breakfast. He doesn’t get beat for experience reasons, when he does: it’s because it’s simply beyond him. There’s no defence for a perfect shot and when you are tiny there’s a lot more area that qualifies. Shooters are better than ever.
×
×
  • Create New...