Thorner

And there it is. Granato said today lineup decision were about Winning Peterka, and his development, has been Blocked, by a player we added in season Its a good day

True, it was almost immediately forgivable in that sense. Not only did we win I’m pretty sure we scored almost immediately lol

Gotta play this on the Tron should this night come to pass

Never forgiving Boychuk Or Mario for somehow being in exactly the right spot. Give me a damn break, Mario. Ive forgiven Smolinski because his grin being immortalized is funny and punishment enough I won’t get over them prioritizing Drury over Briere until we are Back. Should be soon on that, though.

As for Greenway, didn’t really notice him. Way too early to glean anything. I only have him as a bottom 6 winger going forward though, I think even the mid-6 stuff is noise. Nothing wrong with that, though. He amounts to more, all the better

Was drafted as a d man

Watching Oates as a kid, specifically, was formative in developing what I value most in a player. People’s mileage varies a lot on this obviously but it’s also the most entertaining style/skill to me: the whiz playmaker. On a side note, the commentator on SN yesterday said “former Sabre Adam Oates”. Wut.

Wanted to add the above, as I feel it fits in with your salient opening lime below

Tbh I’m with you lol. But I’m well on record saying I’d be disappointed if anyone currently on the roster is the 1G next year

You “laughed” at that @GASabresIUFANbut it’s true: Even in the very unlikely event Power proved to be our #1 pp guy, we’d run 2 D on the PP before Power takes his place outright

Did you watch the Jets game I was there, I didn’t see Samuelsson out there. I might have missed him though as the puck was in the Jets end the entire damn game

Sorry, I already tabulated the votes. His raw totals, ala Karlsson, were just too hard to ignore - - - In seriousness, no, I think we was the biggest im saying this in a thread where I presented evidence to the fact I more less pointed out, 2 years ago, exactly what would happen so, I’m not being humble. Not that I ever am.

I call bullsh*t

Ya, Dahlin won’t lose PP time to anyone. There will always be someone more deserving of having their minutes lessened

We should. If we believe in the principles of mathematics. Not to mention how lucky we’ve been on the injury front. Still, I’d pencil Dahlin in pretty darn confidently as an exception that proves the rule. Become league’s best d... shift to the right.. he probably just does whatever it is we want him to. Cozens has too balanced a game to fail to provide significant value even if, for a season, the points dry up a tad. The rub is that we have mathematically likely reasons to expect some of the likely regression to be offset by the inverse: it’s operating on the same logical principle: Quinn Krebs yada yada. I trust KA’s evaluation of guys like Quinn to the extent there’s no reason to think we can’t see a pretty level playing field in that “career year vs regression” sense, going forward, for a few years. Ie, the Window. Maintaining a status quo offensive output is contender worthy, no? Proof is in pudding re: the ranking next year. It’s just another thing that comes back to GM aptitude. If he’s got the right young players identified, it’s fine. A skill we need anyways, going forward, considering the necessity contending teams have of cycling in ELC talent in the end going from good to great depends on goalie, and Power. Goalie is the biggest. Self explanatory If Power is another exception to the rule, just in general, careers wise (not a bad bet, #1 overall pick) we are simply going to be GMing from a place of privilege for years. That’s what having 2 all stars who combined can play 2/3rds of any game and more less a full playoff game will do. We already have a Smythe Guy in Rasmus Oh man, TL;DR - everyone said all this above me and I took way too long writing it up

No, you were his biggest supporter, bar none

Definitely true. I think it’s the first bit, honestly. There are people in those threads, including the OP in the Fox thread, pointing out they were unaware of how significantly good Dahlin has been playing actual defence, specifically, or just straight up acknowledging it when it’s pointed out. I think it’s the Sabres thing too (but that should change). Don’t see it as a Euro thing, tbh, too much of a history there of great Norris Swedes I can’t see this being anything other than the last year, of that. Of that aspect of his game being ignored. Message has been delivered As an edit - personally I see both Dahlin and Tage being presented as the faces of the turnaround but I might just be biased

Hmm.. Quinn? Id be surprised if he isn’t better than Tuch by the time Tuch’s deal is up

Maybe it’s just me but I’d be terrified to trade him at this stage. And I’m almost never never never the “don’t trade anyone” Guy. But Casey always had ridiculous skill. The question was always if he could find a two-way, gritty game “foothold” in this league. Now that he unquestionably has, I’m not going to be the Guy doubting his ability to launch off from that newly established launch pad. At this stage he’s high on the defcon scale for me for likelihood of having unexplored upside still to come frankly, if I’m right twice on Casey (see upthread) we’re laughing

Funny to say but I’m really glad he said it Times a changin

What a huge game. Potential 4 point swing against the team we likely need to catch. We aren’t in it by point % currently and will fall further away with a loss. On the other hand, a win could significantly alter the landscape. Biggest game of season

@dudacekreading the thread, there’s been some shift on how’s he’s perceived, but not a ton. What I find revelatory however is that your thread seems to answer a question it didn’t pose: NM Casey, has the perception of where the Buffalo Sabres are going, changed? If we are talking about a 50 point guy possibly falling prey to looming Sabres competition we have on the way, probably says something about our current depth, in perception. And how long it’s been since it was viewed in this way.

Got him. HELL no on evaluation year next season. Just stop

Hard disagree. *Leafs* dealt him for a reason, it’s not like their D took a hit. In fact its substantially improved. Not chalking that up to addition by subtraction but they certainly didn’t lose a lick. Certainly wasn’t a guy THAT particular playoff team felt he was a “guy you want on a team.” *Ideally* a 3rd pairing? As in he can fill-in on pair 2 for a time, in a pinch? Talk about a bridge too far. For me he’s ideally a 7 or 8 Like at best

An anomalific performance, to be sure I have no love for this player, full disclosure He’s not very good