Thorner

So to absolutely smash Skinner’s team leading plus minus mark last season? Seems lofty

That there are projections for him to be man 13 to me is a function of the Sabres lacking a proper 13th man. It seems open to pretty much anybody right now because the competition is Brett Murray, Vic Olofsson, and Rousek Granted, Kozak is well behind even those guys but that’s where the perception he’s an option arises, imo

A guy who most likely doesn’t sniff the NHL but also one our instincts would (correctly, imo) have us hold out hope for, simply because of the apparent improved aptitude of the pool at large. Hope will spring eternal for these guys to a man, now (especially if you ask SabreNoise). More likely he’s another Josh Bloom. That’s not a bad thing: aided by such a deep pool, Adams is primely positioned to identify which of the prospect pieces make the most sense as currency, even in such a timely matter where the rest of the league still holds said currency prospects in high regard, with only their outsider perspective of the Sabres’ deep pool to go on

Sorry, I think I was mentally reverting back to what we’d be selling him as, as being able to do on a new team on buffalo I agree I don’t really see 60. 50 though considering Quinn tbh you’d know better if this’ll grant VO more PP time this year. I’m worried about L3

He did pace for 64 points in 19-20. So, he’s already accomplished that pacing outlier but, again, this more so serves my point from the other day about how the dismissal of Jack’s 19-20 is revisionist. VO was so good/notched an outlier season that year because he played with a guy having an MVP quality breakout season. Certainly can’t expect VO to replicate that moving forward. But 50 is there.

Well, that’s why I said he’s a 40 point guy. Who could HIT 50. You really can’t see him ever hitting it? I mean he hit 49 two seasons ago, 50 would def seem in range.

He’s a likely 40 point guy who conceivably hits 50 with healthy, maybe even 60 with health + PP time. He’ll have to improve his 2-way game to be a net positive on line 3, regardless Quinn injury granted him a reprieve. We’ll see what he does with it.

He’s not represented well by the 25-15 Esque stat line because he’s historically not a cy young stat guy. Last year represented the divergence relative to his usual career output. No sense pretending the idea of balance doesn’t have a positive connotation and VO’s stats/ability need not be represented without that in mind. Truth be told it’s at least def possible his playmaking is drying up but there’s good faith statistical evidence to construct the argument it’s more likely not the case at all

Was exactly the point. The fact of the matter, on a per 82 game basis he’s averaged over 50 the past 4 years. Using per game metrics isn’t exactly unusual. You could reasonably argue he has at least a fairly conceivable shot at 50 upon acquiring him, when the main obstacle has been health and not performance.

Well, it’s only July and our nhl roster already has one “and I guess VO” pencilled in, and next man up is a rookie full stop, if a vet simply gets hurt, never mind beat out. After the top 6, our guys are: Krebs, Olofsson, Greenway, Okposo, Girgensons, Jost, Rousek, Kulich, etc It certainly doesn’t read like lightning after you get past Casey/Cozens/JJP ymmv

NO correlation between size and success as a goalie? Find that hard to believe It doesn’t need to be the biggest factor to be *A* factor. The body of starting goaltenders suggest size is still favourable, at this time. Though, as dudacek has pointed out, it’s a shifting trend

I’m still getting used to the fact we no longer care about assembling a gauntlet of competition through which the cream rises to the top, that nowadays it’s more so about doing the exact opposite: holding down spots on the roster “unblocked”, instead, free of capable vets who provide talent obstacles for the kids, the spots instead dangled in front of the youth like carrots. Not arguing the merits of one strategy vs the other but it’s certainly notable That is to say, if VO gets a spot as a vet it’s literally by default, and if a rookie gets the spot instead, they’ve beaten out no one but other rookies, and VO

It’s pretty unfortunate that to win a spot he has to merely beat out...a bunch of guys who’ve never played in the NHL before

I remember my dad explaining this one to me as a young kid, getting an early education on how prime/upside work. That we were trading some future upside with Turgeon, that was the risk, but we were getting a player who was better in the now. And how that trade off sort of works. Good memory

He’s not a 15 assist guy lol. VO’s goal scoring is somehow overrated and his assist contribution continuously underrated. He’s averaged 21 assists per season the last 4 seasons and that’s *not* a per game mark. Per 82 game frame, VO has averaged 26 assists per over the last 4 seasons You have the goals pretty much spot on, he’s averaged 26 per 82 over the last 4. So, VO averages 52 points over 82 his last 4 seasons. It’s not nothing. If he’s a one trick pony, and he arguably is, it’s his full offensive game, though, as the one trick I just think 25/25 paints a more fair, accurate picture, his drop off this past season (largely due to usage imo) notwithstanding. Guarantee if KA is shopping him, he’s shopping what he’s calling a “50 point player” in a favourable situation

He can honestly pass too if given the proper C. We saw the kind of game Eichel was able to drag out of him He’s fine beside an elite C. Which isn’t saying much for him, I guess. As the lineup currently stands I really don’t like his fit on L3

I agree. If he starts the year as 13th man as some are suggesting, I’d say we kinda undercooked the forward unit, for really no reason at all

Ya. Whereas something like Eichel was a drawn out process for me, with various stages of perception/acceptance, Black Sunday was a damn Moment. And more than that, you knew it was the end of something really great, rather than merely a lament of what at one point may have been

No, it’s the result of how Adams has managed the position for going into his now 4th season as GM. It’s the result of his choices. Right, wrong, win, lose. What you wrote is just advanced apologist behaviour. By your statement his strategy either works, or fails but only in a situation where taking any other course of action would have been “insane”, so he’s in effect blameless. It literally alleviates him of any requirement to have the position fixed, where the results themselves aren’t necessarily the definitive factor, which they absolutely need to be

Someone’s gotta post that pic..

At this point in time, I’d guess the most likely result is that he’s somewhat wrong..and that we make the playoffs anyways

Would have to think the Sabres prefer LT, ya. Suppose it just comes down to whether they’d pay enough to make it the option Power prefers, too Agree, they prefer to bridge Power

That’s too bad on Power’s deal being short, if that comes to pass. - - - There shouldn’t be any angst with Dahlin because even the Ullmark situation was different. No one can swoop in and compete for Dahlin, whereas time was of the essence with Ullmark - there was always a chance that if KA negotiated for such a long time and failed to actually get pen to paper, another team could present an offer we didn’t feel like topping

I’d wager Rousek is more likely on the roster as they went to him before Murray last season iirc

The myth is that KA is acquiring the “moneypuck” guys so he can weaponize our cap space elsewhere. The moneypuck guys are just the guys Edit If you meant signings as in Power Dahlin, I agree