Jump to content

Thorner

Members
  • Posts

    37,733
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorner

  1. I don’t think Tim Murray tried to accelerate the process “too quickly”, he simply tried to accelerate the process. and did it poorly.
  2. If we are grading on a pass/fail basis? Probably Like playoffs are playoffs, there’s not going to be any lamenting from me if so, they’ve proven how difficult it is for this franchise to do it, it’s definitely a beggars can’t be choosy situation if they get in. But if we make it on the back of Levi and the backup still sucks, it’s still an unaddressed hole on the roster and that particular area doesn’t look favourable for the GM. It’s not a QB1/backup deal. Both goalie spots play, and play a lot. The negatives will just be less interesting and more few and far between if we’re a playoff team. The good will be well outweighing the poor. I just wouldn’t go so far as to say moot.
  3. You often see teams have an ahead of schedule year before taking a quick step back, have mentioned this a few times before, you kinda see it a lot It factored into why I predicted playoffs in 22-23. If we make it this year, there’s no guarantee there’s not a stumbling block the following (not that I’d predict it outright) Mostly I’m just hoping this PAST year wasn’t the ahead of schedule leaving us due for a potential step back this season
  4. No one got my joke in pointing it out, or at least didn’t think it was funny lmao
  5. Tuch had a sick year passing the puck And Skinner, too As you rightly point out, the top line is the real deal, right now. bird in hand
  6. I got this already!
  7. This is goldilocks Though we def need “probably will be successful” and “probably won’t be” threads I agree with this to a T, and thought the same thing about UPL(and posted as much) when we didn’t play him to end the year at all
  8. Ya like a D isn’t going to win the Norris if he’s playing on a team with a D man that has more points. Not saying there couldn’t be a reasoned argument to be made but I’d say there’s seemingly no chance if Power wins before Dahlin let’s be real: it’ll be facilitated in large part due to a Dahlin injury. Which in fact will aid Power’s narrative
  9. Ya championships are super, at least often overrated in determining the greats I think Considering it’s a team accomplishment. ESPECIALLY in something like hockey
  10. Rightly or wrongly, (ie, small sample size bias may apply) current perception was swayed heavily by Jack’s performance in the playoffs and make no mistake, it was electric. Had arguably the best playoffs of any player being truly dominant at both ends of the ice, during the most critical time you’d want a guy to do it, against EXTREME physicality (we all saw the Tkachuk hit) which actually minimizes the sample season concern. Look, I’m the Jack guy. But even I was impressed. I take 2023 playoffs Eichel if I want to win 1 game before I take the Thompson is saw this past year, and he was indeed great ymmv
  11. That’s a good point and honestly is kinda cool That’s a good point and honestly is kinda cool It literally won’t let me edit out the double post on my phone so there ya go
  12. It’s so weird. The new mantra of choice is 2 birds in the bush is better than 1 in hand
  13. Technically Botterill hired Granato unless I’m mistaken. IIRC Adams retrained Krueger before firing him and promoting Granato. So good job there in the end
  14. So the other teams will look to improve, too? They won’t just roll over and die, granting us a playoff spot? You gotta MAKE it happen.
  15. This is a sick trade for the Pens. Just sick. Jealous of their fans a tad Their window is still wide open. Anyone can go peruse Sid’s stats. he’s still goating it up, maybe better then ever 2-way
  16. The very very best teams and the very very worst teams are exactly the spots most likely to find players committing outlier statistics to record at least relative to the role we MAY ask of them, when extrapolating the numbers I’m losing titles at a Ric Flair rate
  17. He finished 8th in points for centres last year and his D isn’t anything to write home about, so this seems fair. Considering he only did it for 1 year so far, I’m quite happy with the ranking tbh
  18. You really think he can match Dahlin offensively one day? I can’t see it but I’d certainly take it
  19. I get lumped into stormcloud sometimes so speaking on behalf of anyone I represent: I’m not firing KA if we miss. Regardless of how. If we miss again the following year: he should be fired, also regardless of how. If you are the GM for 5 years and can’t get in the playoffs once, you are a poor GM. I don’t care how good you look relative to the bums we’ve had: he’d be definitively below league average if we can’t make the dance 50% of teams make, once in 5 years. Pick a better plan if that’s the case, jeepers sakes.
  20. See bolded below (in weave’s post) and just to add to weave’s great post
×
×
  • Create New...