Jump to content

Thorner

Members
  • Posts

    38,051
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorner

  1. 70 assists, dayum
  2. Skinner had scored 345 times. Maybe Benson already has better defensive awareness but it’s still a lot for him to live up to overall. People acting like Benson is a lock to be better just never learn.
  3. That’s a tough loss. Sucks to say, but some of those top teams are probably playing down to us a little bit. It’s only human nature. Gotta get it figured out quick. 50 games left, now. Only one 2-game win streak at this time is kinda astounding if you think about it. Expected regression seems to have hit the top guys even more than expected, which probably leaves those guys somewhere in the middle, from what we saw last year and what we are seeing this. Good base, but plenty of work to do from management to help out. Still time to get a streak going, though. Maybe with Columbus into Toronto (one can dream.)
  4. Even the smallest person can change the course of the future
  5. Yessir. Tied for 18th with a few others. You didn’t elaborate but I’m inclined to guess your confusion stems from the tweet being about 5 v 5 specifically
  6. Has gotta be a better mindset for the players than “what could he even have done? Our D is bad!” after a goalie gives up a difficult one
  7. And, I don’t think the reasons being mentioned to give Tuch the C are actually real things: so much surrounding/attributed to the “C” is myth. Is Tuch going to do *more* of the leadership stuff he does if he arbitrarily has the letter? He’s holding back, now? Not in my estimation. Leaders lead. Personally I’m more interested in the tangible: I find it hard to think KO doesn’t get preferential ice time treatment due to his letter. Tuch’s next contract, as mentioned he’ll be in his 30s, on the downside. That’s the most dangerous spot to give out a contract. Can we afford to go long term? Do we want a captain on a short term deal? Even worse, does it lead to an overpay in term/value? Slap it on the franchise; slap it on Dahlin. It’s time. Doesn’t need to be vocal, he’s more of a Lidstrom
  8. A win today would be noteworthy, being only our second 2 game win streak of the season A win today AND the next game would finally spark some genuine curiosity in a season that seemed likely lost A win today, the next game, and then beating the Leafs..
  9. Legendary exit tbf
  10. He absolutely shouldn’t be their best forward (if he is). He’s pretty good for a rookie, he’s not good for a team’s top forward. He’s pacing for 39 points over a full season He’s pacing for 34 points over the course of this season
  11. Ya so about average overall. Like I said, I don’t really expect a team to ever be fully healthy, one game or no There will always be someone on the injury report. The link I posted demonstrates that 0/32 teams have zero 1/32 teams have one 31/32 teams have multiple players listed
  12. T-18th in even strength points. Pretty darn good
  13. Just as a side note, not really specifically relevant to the point you are making, but: I dunno, if this isn’t considered healthy, health is merely an abstract concept..we are pretty healthy overall now. Expecting better than current would require above average injury luck. “No injuries” isn’t really the goal. Length of our list par for the course, here: https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/injuries 10 teams have more, 10 teams have less, 11 teams have the same. And we only have 3 guys out relative to the roster we willingly entered into the season with. The list was a bit longer at other times (as with other teams) but as it stands now is a status you take and run with if given the option
  14. Ya I’d go with Dahlin personally, not really a hard choice. He’s already our best player and will be here longer, and in his prime for the duration of his contract Also don’t really want the added pressure to lock up a guy who’ll be on the downside of his career because he’s captain, may even run into an Okposo situation
  15. The Leafs game would be must-see tv if we can go in at nhl 500
  16. Any player worth their weight will care as much as the fans do in the moment: the competitive nature the game requires at the highest level is considerable. But the players will never care about the *Buffalo Sabres* as much as the fans. We love the crest. We have the history. We feel the weight of it in a way they never could, including the drought. Most of these guys didn’t give 2 sh*ts about the Sabres before signing a contract here: they are professionals. It’s a job. A job they may love: but it’s still a job. So do they care as much in the moment? I’d say yes. Does the millions of dollars they make soften the blow? Of course. Do they care about the Buffalo Sabres franchise, beyond their current teammates? Not close to the level of a fan. When they get moved to a new team, that’s their team. So yes, they of course care. There isn’t any lack of it to the extent it would affect winning, imo. They care about winning. It’s just useful to keep in mind the things they don’t care about, as much
  17. It sure as heck makes dealing with the losses easier, though
  18. There’s over-analysis of one game in an 82 game season and one game in a 13 year drought and then there’s this. We didn’t win because we are better without one of our best players. If it’s a better line configuration on L1 without him that’s a *coaching issue*. If we need to save the team from themselves by not playing Skinner that would be a bandaid fix for an issue surely to arise with other lineup decisions
  19. Unless he was suiting up in goal, of course
  20. Exactly lol. I’ve theorized this a bunch and I think you are absolutely right. It’s not surprising: the “we need goaltending” thing has always been staring us RIGHT IN THE FACE and not only that it’s the one area that goes a long way towards masking other issues. It’s why the “who even was there?” logic was always so bad: it’s season 4. You absolutely had the ability to pay what was *necessary* to bring in a good goalie, regardless of what other teams were willing to (which is the biggest factor in who moves and who doesn’t)
  21. Not at all, it was just objectively wrong so you get an X. Sorry dems da rules Well done. Really well done
  22. I’d settle for yo-yo tbh, at least we’d be .500. We’ve been fair a bit below that. I didn’t see the game as mentioned, biggest takeaway before I see the highlights at least seems to be goaltending. Shocker. Looking at the preliminary numbers, this is the kind of performance we need more consistently between the pipes. That other teams get more often than few and far between. See, it’s actually ok for your goalie to provide significant positive value and not just stop the ones he’s “supposed” to, ie the ones that go without saying for a pro goalie. For the millionth time, I’ll say we should waive Comrie: ride Levi for now in a 1/2 and if/when he falters, if Comrie somehow gets claimed, it’ll be easy to find another goalie of his caliber. The dudes I played with tonight are available. Though they might be little bit beyond his level
  23. But we have the White Liger - that has to count for something
×
×
  • Create New...