Thorner

Yessir. Tied for 18th with a few others. You didn’t elaborate but I’m inclined to guess your confusion stems from the tweet being about 5 v 5 specifically

Has gotta be a better mindset for the players than “what could he even have done? Our D is bad!” after a goalie gives up a difficult one

And, I don’t think the reasons being mentioned to give Tuch the C are actually real things: so much surrounding/attributed to the “C” is myth. Is Tuch going to do *more* of the leadership stuff he does if he arbitrarily has the letter? He’s holding back, now? Not in my estimation. Leaders lead. Personally I’m more interested in the tangible: I find it hard to think KO doesn’t get preferential ice time treatment due to his letter. Tuch’s next contract, as mentioned he’ll be in his 30s, on the downside. That’s the most dangerous spot to give out a contract. Can we afford to go long term? Do we want a captain on a short term deal? Even worse, does it lead to an overpay in term/value? Slap it on the franchise; slap it on Dahlin. It’s time. Doesn’t need to be vocal, he’s more of a Lidstrom

A win today would be noteworthy, being only our second 2 game win streak of the season A win today AND the next game would finally spark some genuine curiosity in a season that seemed likely lost A win today, the next game, and then beating the Leafs..

Legendary exit tbf

He absolutely shouldn’t be their best forward (if he is). He’s pretty good for a rookie, he’s not good for a team’s top forward. He’s pacing for 39 points over a full season He’s pacing for 34 points over the course of this season

Ya so about average overall. Like I said, I don’t really expect a team to ever be fully healthy, one game or no There will always be someone on the injury report. The link I posted demonstrates that 0/32 teams have zero 1/32 teams have one 31/32 teams have multiple players listed

T-18th in even strength points. Pretty darn good

Just as a side note, not really specifically relevant to the point you are making, but: I dunno, if this isn’t considered healthy, health is merely an abstract concept..we are pretty healthy overall now. Expecting better than current would require above average injury luck. “No injuries” isn’t really the goal. Length of our list par for the course, here: https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/injuries 10 teams have more, 10 teams have less, 11 teams have the same. And we only have 3 guys out relative to the roster we willingly entered into the season with. The list was a bit longer at other times (as with other teams) but as it stands now is a status you take and run with if given the option

Ya I’d go with Dahlin personally, not really a hard choice. He’s already our best player and will be here longer, and in his prime for the duration of his contract Also don’t really want the added pressure to lock up a guy who’ll be on the downside of his career because he’s captain, may even run into an Okposo situation

The Leafs game would be must-see tv if we can go in at nhl 500

Any player worth their weight will care as much as the fans do in the moment: the competitive nature the game requires at the highest level is considerable. But the players will never care about the *Buffalo Sabres* as much as the fans. We love the crest. We have the history. We feel the weight of it in a way they never could, including the drought. Most of these guys didn’t give 2 sh*ts about the Sabres before signing a contract here: they are professionals. It’s a job. A job they may love: but it’s still a job. So do they care as much in the moment? I’d say yes. Does the millions of dollars they make soften the blow? Of course. Do they care about the Buffalo Sabres franchise, beyond their current teammates? Not close to the level of a fan. When they get moved to a new team, that’s their team. So yes, they of course care. There isn’t any lack of it to the extent it would affect winning, imo. They care about winning. It’s just useful to keep in mind the things they don’t care about, as much

It sure as heck makes dealing with the losses easier, though

There’s over-analysis of one game in an 82 game season and one game in a 13 year drought and then there’s this. We didn’t win because we are better without one of our best players. If it’s a better line configuration on L1 without him that’s a *coaching issue*. If we need to save the team from themselves by not playing Skinner that would be a bandaid fix for an issue surely to arise with other lineup decisions

Tweet that, tweety-bird

Unless he was suiting up in goal, of course

Exactly lol. I’ve theorized this a bunch and I think you are absolutely right. It’s not surprising: the “we need goaltending” thing has always been staring us RIGHT IN THE FACE and not only that it’s the one area that goes a long way towards masking other issues. It’s why the “who even was there?” logic was always so bad: it’s season 4. You absolutely had the ability to pay what was *necessary* to bring in a good goalie, regardless of what other teams were willing to (which is the biggest factor in who moves and who doesn’t)

Not at all, it was just objectively wrong so you get an X. Sorry dems da rules Well done. Really well done

I’d settle for yo-yo tbh, at least we’d be .500. We’ve been fair a bit below that. I didn’t see the game as mentioned, biggest takeaway before I see the highlights at least seems to be goaltending. Shocker. Looking at the preliminary numbers, this is the kind of performance we need more consistently between the pipes. That other teams get more often than few and far between. See, it’s actually ok for your goalie to provide significant positive value and not just stop the ones he’s “supposed” to, ie the ones that go without saying for a pro goalie. For the millionth time, I’ll say we should waive Comrie: ride Levi for now in a 1/2 and if/when he falters, if Comrie somehow gets claimed, it’ll be easy to find another goalie of his caliber. The dudes I played with tonight are available. Though they might be little bit beyond his level

But we have the White Liger - that has to count for something

They’ll be up for this one. If Levi gives them a good start we’ll have a good shot at it. Maybe even a Tuch shot at an empty net.

I thought it was going to be Gene Hackman when I clicked into the thread Ah.

Better question is probably “when”. There’s almost certainly a late season stretch with our name on it where we rack up a bunch of wins against teams that don’t take us seriously. But that will only be a mirage: key is for ship to be righted while we actually have a realistic chance of making the playoffs

I feel like people only get tired of hearing the “youngest team” thing when it’s used under the context of being a defence for the GM. I don’t blame the players at all. They are merely the sum total of what Kevyn Adams committed to record. The expectation for this season was playoffs because the context of that expectation is analysis of the GM. If the sentence that follows is, “well, it’s an unfair expectation because a poor GM did a bad job assembling the roster, and part of that is the team is too young: I’m all for it - - - “They aren’t good enough because they are too young” can be true, and still serve as an indictment of the GM. The important thing is that we acknowledge the GM is a bad one. (fine, “Competent” is still on the table, if we can make the playoffs this season somehow) The ship has more less sailed. A plan that takes 5 years to make the playoffs is a bad plan, and that’s the earliest it’s looking that we can get in. Anyone can sit in the GM chair and do literally nothing, I could literally do it. He’s a bad GM. Can we get to the playoffs under a bad GM? Law of averages says yes: In a league where half make it, ya, we should still be able to get in eventually, one would think, even if he’s on an apparent lifetime term

Thankfully, have my own game tonight. Don’t worry, I’m wearing my hat again to rep