Thorny

"And it's another Sabres........POWER point!"

No I comment about a team I hate because the board is the best and most enjoyable part about it that it pisses you off so much is just an added bonus

Yes and the reason you don’t hire a housekeeper is because you care too much about then cleanliness of your house check your logic at the door all ye who enter this thread

You don’t even believe your own jargon You can’t work a 14 year old drought into it being a fan problem because they are never happy. It’s devoid of logic All you’ve done is prove the drought could extent to 20 years and you’d be making the same argument cause you have quite literally zero standard, and zero argument

I like the diagnosing of it not being about winning when I was screaming it 5 years ago lo

YESAVAGE

From your keyboard to god’s ears

Grok, is this true?

That’s awesome. Miss him a lot

Oh sweet. From Rick as well?

1 One Battle After Another 2 Boogie Nights 3 Phantom Thread 4 There Will Be Blood 5 Magnolia 6 Punch-Drunk Love 7 The Master 8 Hard Eight 9 Licorice Pizza 10 Inherent Vice You are right about PTA. Top 5 are, for me, masterpieces.

Probably just a combination of both the fact of the matter being the burden of proof is on Norris at this point due to the consistent track record of missing games, and the fact at one point Samuelsson was a “don’t treat him like Bogosian” guy, until he wasn’t this is a big year for him (obviously). Once players go down the road he’s been on it gets harder to change lanes the more time you’ve missed, the more you’ve slowed down - but it can be done: there was time people didn’t think Sid would get back to being healthy and he totally recovered

/thread

Remember during Covid days, there was that fad of getting those “cameos” from celebrities, where you could request personalized videos that they’d send you themselves - we got one of Rick, of course! Haha

lol you are right, I should know better by now

One Battle After Another was pure excellence. Straight to the top of my PTA ranking

I’ve wondered about it too and came to the conclusion that they probably would have the foresight ..but then I remind myself we are talking about the Buffalo Sabres under Terry Pegula and… well I’m glad I’ve got it, just in case

Me and my dad do have a recorded video of him announcing the sabres as Stanley Cup champions, just saying If it ever should be in need

Not much beyond the expected fringe changes every team does every summer, at least- and certainly not relative to the “heads will roll” narrative sold last offseason

I use the X occasionally to express disagreement. That’s what it’s there for. Equal but opposite to a like which I give out very abundantly. That’s the main reason why I took issue with your post: I don’t want it construed that simply leaving an X means there’s no counter point to be made lol. I use it if I think my contention would be obvious given the over abundance of words I’m already using

The goal is to build a good team not one slightly better than the one with DC Not really sure where I’m losing you here Adams can “win the trade” yet still not properly build out the top 6. Obviously Norris being a good top 6 player is more important and a greater reflection on Adams than merely “being as good as Cozens, anything else gravy” Adams doesn’t get to artificially lower the bar for what’s expected of a top 6 C merely because he installed a very bad one for a time are we grading him on a curve? lol

Madness…Madness!

That..doesn’t make any sense the goal when building a team isn’t to “find a guy at least better than Dylan Cozens”. We were counting on Dylan to be a top 6 C, and that’s the role we are penciling Norris in for, now. That Dylan failed to deliver doesn’t absurdly lower the bar for the next guy where are only need him to marginally replace the failed guy: the playoff line doesn’t follow suit You are thinking in terms of how one might evaluate a trade, I guess. But “winning trades” is a shade of the importance of team building. What matters most is how well he fulfills the role of top 6 C. Anything beyond THAT, is just great Adams’ duty to field a legitimate 1C/2C supersedes his duty to win the trade for Dylan Cozens. Norris’s primary objective isn’t to prove the trade right, it’s to be a good top 6 C. What good would simply avoiding being a net negative while notching 1 goal be if there’s a gaping hole in the top 6? Essentially- we definitely aren’t in a situation where it’s “avoid being a net negative and anything else is gravy” which is basically what you said

“you need to build a balanced team.” No shite. It doesn’t mean you trade your most talented players to do it Trading Eichel and Reinhart wasn’t an “opportunity”, it was a horrendous step backwards. That’s already proven out “too many elite players, not enough warriors” is nonsense. There’s literally no meaning there, as they aren’t “either/or” propositions. The issue has never once been that we’ve had “too many elite players”, I promise you. That’s not possible on its face. The abilities you are alluding to that fall under the category of, for lack of a better word, “grit”, also are encompassed by “talent” and can factor into what makes an elite player elite as much as anything. The ability to play the game in winning fashion. Defensive ability is a talent. Being able to consistently work hard in a way that best facilitates your skills making an impact is also a talent. - - - Also for the record, stop being such a baby about getting a “big red” X. Why is it so “big” to you? Take it up with the moderators if you don’t like the feature. Frankly it’s an easy way to disagree with your posts when I oft-need to. The post I gave you that gargantuan X on hardly deserved these paragraphs. It was devoid of context with one sentence of erroneous logic - that’s what I was responding to, that it made intrinsically no sense. - - - You were obv referencing my post above yours when you said “elite”, and you completely missed the point. “That we’ve failed to properly supplement”, I said. Of course you need balance. You didn’t make the connection to that I was talking about was the fact we aren’t *doing well* by the elite players we HAVE had by properly rounding out the depth of the team. Any of the “elite” players you’ll deem to have failed will not have been brought up in an environment tailored to success if you are referring to any of the last 14 years, due to the lack of overall talent and balance and depth (ie - the make up of the team). That this is actually congruent with your musings, that escaped you at the time, no doubt.