-
Posts
37,729 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Thorner
-
Nope, just her and her social media gal. Unfortunately I can’t be there this time. Got rejected on account of being too un-fashionable
-
-
I think his bark probably still precedes his bite. There’s a lot of that Concept stuff still out there: as mentioned i think he’s a reasonable player but any GM worth his weight would continually be exploring avenues where we might find value to exploit. I could see someone overpaying. Or paying. If not, keep him
-
His impacts this year have been a sizeable net negative he’s been OK on D, but the amount of ground he gives up to everyone else in other facets more than offsets the value he’s bringing relative to other players. Think of it like this: maybe when he’s on the ice we give up 3 shots for every 4 that other teams do, but we *take* like 5 less shots than the other teams we are comparing to. So we get outplayed when he’s on the ice whereas not so with the other example
-
Muel earned his rep because of a small, irrelevant sample size last year that led to people calling him our team mvp. It was being argued last year that we’d sooner remove *any other player* from the lineup than Samuelsson. There absolutely needs to be pushback here after that. He’s a reasonable player that was extremely overhyped. The receipts are there, I just refuse to quote anyone. The blowback is relative putrid decision making process re: his contract. He’s been bad this year, but lots of players have. I still think he provides the type of value I’d like on my team: but not being in a position of, at all, needing to commit long term at the time we did, all we’ve done is take on a bunch of unnecessary risk. It’s not a comment on the player, it’s a comment on the GM
-
Those calling him soft I suppose represent an exception, but those arguing re: his contract…that clearly has nothing to do with blaming Samuelsson. And if Adams is down right now, yes, I’ll kick the guy while he’s down. He’s a handsomely paid professional general manager. Do better than generally awful
-
-
Have You Missed Seeing Them Play During This Break? Be Honest!
Thorner replied to bob_sauve28's topic in The Aud Club
For my part, only way this doesn’t end in disappointment is a 120 point-pace run over the final 33 that ends in a playoff berth. And really, only the second part of that sentence matters. No more “moral victory” trophies left in the Achievements list. -
Have You Missed Seeing Them Play During This Break? Be Honest!
Thorner replied to bob_sauve28's topic in The Aud Club
As for the OP question…No not really. Playoffs are nearly impossible and this season’s worth was always measured in playoffs. Expectation wise, but also commitment wise I posted less here during the break tho so I’m excited for SS to be back more. SS is great. I’ll always enjoy being here, don’t have any concern about that aspect -
Have You Missed Seeing Them Play During This Break? Be Honest!
Thorner replied to bob_sauve28's topic in The Aud Club
I am sort of candidly terrified to see what my reaction to actually being good again will be. Sometimes there isn’t any going back. -
-
“Could care less.”
-
It’s also rather telling that you gave my post an eye-roll, and (re: the bold) then proceeded to agree with the root of my argument. Haters be hating
-
Predicted Skinner’s return to form Predicted Dahlin’s. Defended Dahlin when everyone was down on him during Krueger years. Defended Reinhart and Casey Mittelstadt. Advocated for giving Casey time. Staunchly defended our Captain, Jack Eichel: I’m positive all the time about our guys. You are conflating “not often positive” with “don’t often agree with your take” And, I gotta say, Chewie, that being well familiar with your takes: I’m good with that for now.
-
Just a little bit of sugar today Send out the red x, get the (T)horns
-
Paid for his present, which might be too much, but is certainly inarguably not an underpay, at the risk of a contract boat anchor because of his injury status. We could have everything we are getting from Samuelsson, but without the risk. Instead, we have a bunch of risk. There was no league wide precedent for signing a guy for that long with only a handful of professional games. No need to commit anytime soon. The likelihood of his injuries presenting a long term availability issue is significantly, inarguably higher than the liklihood he offensively pops off the the tune of ever earning a bigger contract. Awful contract. Needless commitment during the beating heart of the “we wAHnt players who wAHnt to be here111” era. A misfire of shallow, obvious messaging. A masterclass revelatory farce from Kevyn Adams Thanks for playing
-
@Sabres Fan in NSyou can deal out all the red Xs u like because you have no way to actually refute my argument- but it’s a pretty poor reflection of your unwillingness to admit you are objectively wrong. I’m not mad, I’m just disappointed
-
At this point calling Samuelsson “muel” is like in cartoons where the fat guy is called “tiny”
-
I disagree. Some players demonstrably have game-styles that more often put them in the line of fire for injuries: “prone” can also be representative of the situational. Bogosian was a good example Samuelson is clearly injury prone. I’m not ready to get there with Quinn Once the sample size gets large enough
-
He’s a paid professional and there are paying customers and the commitment to winning would be disastrous to step back from. If he’s not fully healed at 8 weeks, of course, OF COURSE, sit him. But if he’s fully healthy he’s fully healthy. Use the remaining games to improve your own We haven’t made the playoffs in 13 years. We absolutely can’t have the hubris to act like a single solitary game can be afforded to be willingly passed up by this franchise. *Every single moment* available to them as professionals on the job should be utilized - if they have respect, at all, for the fan base.
-
Cody Rhodes fans might disagree
-
Most Words (that take this format)