Contempt

edit: nevermind, you're not worth my time

Step one, be a foot taller.

Fiat was never the mark of quality.

Jaysus Christ....

Get him some TB12

It wasn't intended as a direct comparison to either. It was a comment about how nobody knows how either one of them are going to shake out at the NHL level despite rampant optimism. Yes, Levi is tearing up college hockey. He's still short by NHL standards. We will see how he fares. We won't know until he gets here.

Everyone who is fully erect for the two NCAA goalies in the pipeline should look at this and calm the hell down

I don't think he's hostile, I just don't want to hear him anymore.

Vitek Vanecek seems to be doing quite well. He's been available at least twice. Alexandar Georgiev has also been pretty spicy they also had Ullmark on the actual team, but who knows maybe he wouldn't have signed any any circumstances.

Praise be the word of the Lord.

1 ignored user ever, now +2 in two days. Not you, the tinfoil hat guy who probably has an election to refuse to certify somewhere.

Then why do you watch at all?

So...Dahlin DIDN'T deserve a roughing call there? K.

Dang. That almost looked like a set of balls on the ice. Let's see what they do next.

Ok, I'll bite. Then why didn't they claim a veteran defenseman when the whole D was hurt? They clearly needed and still need some support there and what was available really can't be worse than what we were calling up and we don't really have any D prospects in Rochester to block anyway. It just feels like there's incongruity there. Whatever.

If the timeline isn't to start winning, at least a little, in the next 2 years idk what to say so he matches from that standpoint but I don't know that he brings the defensive improvement that we need. We need more than Samuelsson to be able to reliably defend. His injury history also concerns me quite a bit. Certainly too much to consider ponying up what AZ is reported to want. I have 2 follow-up questions. 1. Isn't that the same timeline the Sabres appear to be on? 2. If #1 is true why do people have a fit when I suggest trading Olofsson?

This is what would give me significant pause. He hurts his knee, now suddenly they are willing to deal him away even though he has 2 more years left at a very reasonable number? That sounds very sketchy to me.

It's the only things I've said remotely recently. Where's that ignore button? Edit - found it

Which stupid thing did I suggest? I think being open to trading Olofsson for a proper defenseman is prudent and that's about the only thing I've said but don't let that stop your continued arrogance. Edit-correction I was also confused why they didn't claim a defenseman for free when the team was essentially out of defensemen and doesn't have a lot of depth there anyway.

So...after he hurt his knee then. How's he doing now?

The team sucks. I want it to not suck. I want it to not suck as quickly as possible without doing stupid things. Don't confuse that with demanding "immediate" change. I appreciate your condescension though. Typically this level of arrogance is reserved for teams that have a modicum of success.

Immediate? Can we have change on a time scale that is somewhat shorter than the entirety of galactic history?

Who on the team are you willing to trade that will get you anything of value at all in return?