Jump to content

jad1

Members
  • Posts

    2,304
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jad1

  1. This team doesn't suck because they traded Byron and McNabb. How much ice time do you think McNabb would have gotten under Bylsma or Housley? Buffalo's archetype defenseman the last 5 years has been Kris Letang. McNabb doesn't fit that archetype. Byron had 16 goals the four years he played in Calgary after being traded by Buffalo. That wouldn't have helped the Sabres screaming need for top six fowards. And at that time, the trade wasn't even that bad. A salary dump, two slow-developing prospects for a veteran physical defenseman and a 2nd round pick. That's a trade most would make all day.
  2. If this is the plan, Botterill won't be the GM by the time the team is "ready" to win. The team has cap space and assets to trade, but Botterill is going to put everything on hold until (if) Mittelstadt and Cozens develop? Doesn't seem like the best way foward.
  3. So you're saying the Sabres shouldn't have traded Pu for Skinner? Drafting kids at 17 and 18 is crapshoot. Most kids drafted in the later rounds level off and just aren't NHL quality players. Trades play a huge role in building NHL rosters. Trading draft assets for better prospects or established players is not a bad thing.
  4. Is that after 3 more 70 point seasons?
  5. They got Skinner for Pu, a 2nd, 3rd and a 6th. There are deals to be made, just need to be patient. And the Sabres also have cap space as an asset.
  6. That Marleau deal is just plain weird. Why would a team with an internal cap take on a salary dump like this.
  7. Olofsson will be on the Sabres roster this season. Nylander will either be gone next week or will also be on the Sabres roster. So they're leaving the pipeline. Davidsson, Asplund, Pekar, Routsalainen, and Thompson don't project to top six forwards. Cozens does project to a top six forward, but he's at least two years away. Only Asplund, Pekar, Routsalainen and Thompson will be in Rochester next season. If Botterill can acquire a center and winger through free agency or by trade, they should be all right, but it's going to be expensive.
  8. By the time that these guys crack NHL rosters, there's a good chance that GM who drafted them is gone. Using the draft is now the preferred way to build a team in the NHL, but due to the age of the players, it's also incredibly risky.
  9. There doesn't seem to be the desire to stockpile draftpicks anymore. Why trade an NHLer for a prospect who won't crack the league for 3 years from now. Two-thirds of the GMs could be out of their current jobs by then. I don't think that's the expectation. The majority understands that these picks are being made are at least a couple of years away from making the roster. Most also understand that after Nylander and Olofsson, the Sabres winger pipeline is near empty and would like to see it re-stocked with some highly-ranked prospects. I wonder if the NHL has considered increasing the draft age to 20. It would make the draft more exciting.
  10. Sounds like they need to bring video scouting back.
  11. That's fine, but after three drafts, his top six forward pipeline is empty.
  12. He knows that in the modern NHL, the goal is to win games 2-1. That's how Ralph won in the EPL.
  13. Botterill's last 8 picks, 6 defensemen and 2 forwards. He also traded a first round pick for a defenseman (Montour).
  14. So what, we have 5 legit forward prospects in the pipeline?
  15. Pick the big winger who scores.
  16. All right. Table's set.
  17. Because you would be broke, working the street corners by now. ?
  18. That kid might need a cane to get to the stage.
  19. Cool, now we can stop the Knight nonsense.
  20. Kings bringing a jersey to the podium
  21. If Botterill picks Knight, can be be fired before FA starts?
  22. Yep, the draft could go off the rails a bit here.
×
×
  • Create New...