Stads

We can change it to Will Win because they'll be so darn good 🤔

'Merica Whiteness Misguided Wad Mandatory Wetness

I think most of us thought that going into the last two games. Is there a good chance they get absolutely killed? Most likely that happens, but in Houser we trust

Malodorous Wienerschnitzel

He shouldn't have been playing at all in that condition. Mazel tov to him though

Missionary Whimpers Doogie leads us to victory once again...or we killed 7-1...or anything in between

My son, I will do my best to give young Houser the strength to smite Satan reincarnated in the form of the neutral zone trap. The Island Men from Brooklyn have angered me with their take few chances style of play. I know this season has been trying for you and your brethren. Keep the faith as better hockey should be on the horizon. -Big Man Upstairs

Militarized Whippets or Malaysian Liposuction Depending on what camp you're in

We've been searching for his replacement ever since. I would love to see him sign a one day contract and retire as a member of the Sabres

Captain?

I perused that thread. I can understand the "faceoffs don't matter" opinion. I am of the mindset that having possession of the puck is better than not. I suppose you could put more weight into winning "high importance" faceoffs.

Mammogram Webcast

They had a few chances to get that out of the zone before that goal

Nice neutral zone play Risto

Musty Wickets

Kind of hard to judge UPL with the limited workload. Made a nice save on the redirect on the PK

I am Ultimately Predicting Loss even though UPL's first start is something intriguing to watch

Milquetoast means timid so my little brain thought a timid womanizer would be quite chuckle inducing. If I have failed to elicit the aforementioned chuckles, then mea culpa

Milquetoast Womanizer

If anyone had "Bad Risto penalty" on your Sabres' bingo board, mark it off

Masburtates Willingly

Comical

I'm okay with the Risto in front on the PP experiment to be over