mjd1001

Many know, I'm not in favor of firing Granato, is he perfect, no, but I think this season's failure is more on the players than the coach. However, if you are going to change coaches..... I think you need the GM AND the owner present for interviews, and if you want a top coach like Brind'Amour, you are going to have to tell him...here is your 4-5 year deal....YOU are going to have input into the roster AND the direction of the roster. Basically, something I don't think Pegula would want...but if the GM and Coach (or in this case the coach) says...I don't want this guy...or I want to draft this guy...he gets basically the final say. Sure, the owner should be informed of moves but not involved in decision making. It has to be more of.....letting the owner know what the moves being made are, and explain to him WHY they are being made, thats it. We can't have Pegula wanting Leino...or sitting on on personal meetings, asking questions about day-to-day things. Its not a good work environment for have the owner 'sitting in' on coaching meetings, personal meetings, giving his input and expecting things to be run by him. Sure, Pegula has the RIGHT to do that, but you want to attract a new coach, not an unknown, a minor league guy, or an older guy on his 4th chance.....then that new guy needs to know him and the GM run the franchise...the owner will be informed, but not involved. If Terry doesn't want that then fine, but then he, and all of us, have to accept the consequences of that.

There isn't anything wrong with that article, but its almost like someone took AI and had them scan this entire site of every post, and then write an article that consolidated common opinions and stats brought up into an aritlce. Great article for the casual fans and a great summary of the season, but most of what was in there was discussed over and over on this forum.

I'd just expect a little more from Cozens, seeing how he had 30 last year, and he's been a full time player for 3+ years now. Plus you do have numerous young players doing well in a variety of circumstances....Wyatt Johnson is playing a big role on Dallas fighting for the presidents trophy. Locan Cooley and Dylan Guenther aren't playing for anything at all in Arizona. Lucas Raymond is in the middle of a playoff push just like the Sabres. Those are just 4 guys I found in looking at stats for 30 seconds.....all of them younger than Cozens, all of them putting in goals at (or close to) a goal every other game over the same year end stretch drive. I am very hard on Cozens, but after last year, and him getting paid $7m+, I really REALLY want more production from him.

Agree. I guess you can see if Krebs 'magically changes' over the offseason and becomes a guy who can produce 10-15 goals and 40 points next year. I'm not thinking that can happen though, but it might? But even if it does, I don't think you want to assume that will happen. Bring in a veteran guy that has a history of at least decent production. If Krebs transforms into something special, you can make room for him,but you need an additional legit center in here that isn't currently on the roster or in Rochester.

4 goals and 2 assists over the same period of time for Skinner. Not good at all, for sure someone in the category of not 'stepping up' when the team needed him. But Skinner's 4 goals in 18 games over that time (18 goal pace, 1.16 goals per 60) is actually a LOT more productive than Cozens ((5 goal pace, 0.26 goals per 60) or Krebs (5 goal pace, 0.30 goals per 60). Either way, take that moment (March 3) where they were in the best position all year as far as making the playoffs (other than the start of the season), playing their very best all year....where the next month was going to be the most critical month of upcoming games for this team wanting to make the playoffs (again, since the beginning of the year), and Thompson, Tuch, Peterka, Dahlin....they really stepped up and produced in that critical stretch. Skinner did not, but Krebs and Cousins REALLY did not. 1 goal in 18 games, hardly any assists, being overall minus player....they basically disappeared when the team need players to step up.

I posted this in another thread, but it applies to your post. I agree most of what you said. And yes, Krebs and Cozens can get better/get back on track, but something is very worrying: -As in my other post, optimism hit is peak around here on March 2, Sabres had just won 5 of 6, beat Vegas 7-2, and were above the .500 points per game mark. I'd honestly say that was the point of peak optimism and things went bad since then. In 17 games since then, Thompson scored 11 goals in those 17 games and 20 points, and has been a plus 11. BUT...Krebs and Cozens. Starting that stretch, the stretch that was going to determine whether you made the playoffs or not...They both played 18 games, both had 1 single goal each in those 18 games, and were both minus players.

I think it was the March 7nd game against Vegas (a 7-2 win) that optimism for this team possibly making a run at the playoffs hit a peak. They had just won their 5th in 6 games (wins over Carolina, Tampa, and Vegas of course), the only loss being a 1 goal loss to Florida in Florida, and they passed the .500 point percentage for the first time in a long time. Since then, things haven't gone well. Who exactly showed up and who didn't since then during the stretch to the playoffs, that obviously failed: -Tage showed up. 11 goals, 20 points, +11 in 17 games (53 goal, 96 point, +53 pace projected over 82 games) -Peterka, 9 goals in 18 games. -Tuch, 18 points in 18 games. Who didn't? Cozens. 1 goal. 5 points. -3. In 18 games. I get it, he's 23. But is risky to rely on Cozens as your #2 center next year.

What was I wrong about. Of course, if replying to what I said makes you feel better without telling me what is wrong...I guess good for you. I don't know if it fascinates or me more, or if its something else that when I make a comment about people swearing...all that stuff I said in my previous posts...that SO many come back at me and defend that behavior. Mind you, I'm not talking about criticizing the team and wanting them to be better...I get that...but so many people want to criticize me for pointing out the level of hatred and ill-wishing onto others that some have embraced.

Not even close, that isn't anywhere near what I was saying. But I guess you (and others) want to swear, say people are useless, wish for them to lose jobs...etc....THAT is ok, but its not me OK for me to say I agree with the concept of some of it, but don't like the level of hatred and swearing that is being used here? Yeah, take what I said to the level you did...lol, if that makes you feel better, because you are just wrong. Wanting more is expected. Saying you want changes, explaining why...yeah, that is totally expected. But as per my other posts right above, my comment was not about those things, my post is about the fact there is so much hatred and foul language and ill wishing here. If you people can't tell the difference, or you think its acceptable to feel that way because your hockey team is losing...wow.

Yes, but there is a difference between wanting better....and the level of hatred that some are filling up these threads with. See, that is my problem. If there is a binary choice of "joining the hate" or "don't come on a message board"...yeah, that is bad and that says, at the very least, something about the people who want to hate and spill vitriol and don't like it when people like me say its a bit over the top. Join the angry mob or go away! um...no thanks.

Wow, the name calling, complaining, vulgarity, becuase a HOCKEY team we follow is losing? Fire people! Swearing in comments (or wanting to) so ***** must be used, Players and the team 'sucks ass', guys are 'useless' or 'wastes of space'. Really? I think all of us want this team to win, but does being so negative, so full of hate and vitriol at a hockey team and needing to express it that way make all of you feel better?

Which means they are a lot better once you hit the first intermission, meaning the coaches are great at making adjustments. It can be argued either way. To me wins and losses, goals scored vs allowed across the entire game matter, when goals are scored vs allowed mean virtually nothing compared to the totals across the entire game.

3 points is what they will miss by

Agreed. Goalies recently seem to be paid less than other players, maybe its because they CAN be inconsistent year to year. But when you do have a quality starting level goalie, they are more important to your team than all but the very top stars on the rest of your roster. You think you have a guy, give him the market rate pay, especially when the market rate pay is right now more affordable for goalies than it is for other positions.

We are all like that at times. With me its Krebs and Cousins (although I think they, especially cousins, is finally playing better.) The team isn't in the playoffs. Its been a while. Yeah, no one likes that, but making changes, changing players, changing coaches, that isn't always the answer. It may be the answer at times, it may make us feel better because "something is being done" but often times, that terrible word (patience) is what you need just a little more of.

I'm not sure why we say the Flyers are inferior enough on paper than the Sabre that its an issue. Philly has 8 of their top 10 scoring forwards as former first round picks, 2 of them in the top 10. They have really no rookies or first year players, but they have a good mix of guys in their early 20's, late 20's and guys in their 30s. Their top 2 D-men are also former first round picks, and they have a really good mix of veterans back there that actuall are still productive. The Sabres have a few more top 10 picks than the Flyers, but that Philly team is under-rated in terms of talent, and they are older/have a better mix of veterans than the Sabres do. In terms of 'talent and pedigree' they really aren't lacking guys with skill, and 'on paper' they are a more experienced team than Buffalo. Last year I looked at Philly's roster and thought they were in trouble, but when I look at who they have...sure no 'elite' talent, first or 2nd overall picks, but on paper they do have a lot of talent, it may even be one of the 'better constructed' rosters out there.

He wasn't that bad. It really was when the calendar changed to 2024 he really heated up. The 'half season' of production starting January 1st to now: 32 starts, .921 save percentage, 2.25 gaa The 'bad' half season before that: 15 starts, .892 save percentage, 3.13 gaa Comrie? .864 save percentage, 3.91 gaa, and 1 win in 9 starts. Even the 'bad' UPL was no where near, not even close to as bad as Comrie has been this year.

I saw Gretzky as a kid..and Jagr, and Ovi, Lindros (for his short prime) and McDavid and Matthews. For me, no one was more terrifying, more unstoppable than Mario Lemieux in his prime. In my hockey lifetime, 2 guys were head and shoulders above that entire list. Lemieux and Hasek. When they were on, the closest things to a literal hockey interpretation of an irresistible force and an immovable object. Back to the original point though..when you take into consideration pure observable talent, longevity, production at the peak of their career....I believe Ovi is the best pure goal scorer I have ever seen.

I'm going to repeat what stands out to me, this defense group, top to bottom is a lot better than many give credit to WHEN the forwards support them in their own end just at an average level. Everyone on the D-group looks bad when the forwards would float near the blue line, lost 70% of loose puck battles in the D-zone or just vacate entire areas of the ice. Since the first of the year, something happened where the forwards got a lot better in their own zone, and guess what? The defense looks a LOT better. Not perfect, not the best group in the league, but from Dahlin at the top of the lineup to the bottom, including guys like Bryson and Clifton, they all look like real NHL quality guys back there. Does that mean that Bryson and Clifton will never make mistakes again costing the team goals? No, but to me it means they are true, quality 3rd pair guys that can function on a winning team, not borderline AHL guys that are only playing because there is no better option. For the last 2 years in the Eastern conference, every single team that had a positive goal differential for the year made the playoffs (16 teams were positive, all 16 made the playoffs) and every single team that had a negative goal differential missed the playoffs (16 for 16 there too). Sabres now have a positive goal differential for the year.

I really do think you are looking at $4.5m for 3 or 4 years. If I had to guess I think that is the asking price. For those who say you don't go over $4m....if he refuses to sign a multi-year deal unless you bumped it up to the $4.5-5m range...what do you do? Look to move him? Let him go to arbitration where every once in a while you get some crazy numbers? I think Samsanov went to arbitraion in Toronto last year if I'm not mistaken. His numbers were slightly better overall, but not as good as the run UPL is on. The 3.6m he got in arbitration, I guess that would be equivilant to $3.8-$4 with a higher projected cap, so many an arbitration award wouldn't be that bad for one year. But then if he has another good year, the price goes WAY up the following year.

Ok, last time they played was back in November, these are different teams now. Back then, Sabres lost 5-1. Eric Johnson had 17 minutes of ice time. Samuelsson played but got hurt during the game. Rousek, Biro, Okposo, and Mitts played (all of them had 14 minutes or more of ice time), and Quinn did not play. UPL started, allowed 5 goals on just 17 shots, a 0.737 save percentage for the game. Of course, the Sabres did beat the Flyers just a few days before that game 5-2, a game UPL stopped 30 of 32 shots and Brandon Biro had 2 goals. It seems to me this is the type of team the Sabres don't match up well against (not as talented, but harder working). I feel pretty good about this one tonight though, I think this is another win for the Sabres.

I agree. But this is the reason why a 3 year deal with him make just so much sense. Even if you beleilve in Levi, there is nothing wrong with Levi being a backup, or them coming close to splitting starts. Lets say you pay UPL for 3-4 years, and he is who he is (average to above average at least) AND Levi comes on strong and becomes very good to great....what do you do with UPL? you now have a VERY good backup...OR a very, VERY good trade piece.

Maybe I got wordy and didn't choose my words well, but I think we do agree. I'm saying that you do sign him, you do not quibble over a little money, that he is that important to the team that you just get it done.

I agree that is likely and probably make sense. If he is demanding $4.5-$5, and him and his agent don't move off of that, I'm not sure at some point I don't try to make a deal. I think fair value for him is probably $4m or a bit more based on his age, pedigree, and recent peformance, as well as comparables. With this team needing a little stability in goal, I'm just not sure I play hardball over an extra $0.5-1M per year at a position that is so important to this team now and you likely will not mave many other options. I think that number would be a bit high and he'd take it for sure. I'm all for slightly overpaying him, and even I think that is high..

I think I look at him more positively because I think his positives outweigh his negatives, and I think many of his negatives are a result of those around him. However, I can see and understand some of your points. "Clean up" is a good word, as I think he is capable of doing those things. We have to remember, Dahlin is still so young and inexperienced. When you look at D-men that are 2-way guys (known for both their offensive play as well as their defensive/physical play), You look at Hedman (33 years old, 1207 career games), Josh Morrissey (29 years old, 614 games) Adam Fox (26 years old, 381 games), Roman Josi (33 years old, 988 games), Charlie McAvoy(26 years old, 530 games played). Dahlin is still only 23 years old, has 430 games but none of those are playoff games and most of them were with a losing team. He still is young and learning, D-men take a while to fully develop so I'm still very hopeful with him. When you look at all of those guys I listed none of them (not even Hedman) were considered as good as they are when they were 23 years old.