mjd1001

I don't watch every Colorado game, but through some regular season games and a lot of post season, I have seen a lot of Mekar. To me he is not much different than Karlsson....he is great offensively and skating, but he is actually pretty bad in his own end. Out of position a lot and he seems to give more effort in the offensive end than his own end. One of the Sabres goals last night, he playing more like a winger than a D-man---on the boards making a stick check on one of the Sabres players, then he chased toward the blue line..and ended up trailing the goal scorer from behind. A lot of other people say he is good in his own end and that his positioning is actually good. I haven't seen that, to me his positioning is bad but he makes up for a lot of it with his speed and acceleration. But again, I have probably seen him play 20 games, not every one he plays.

Late 40's. I have some faint memories of listening to Ted Darling. This may be blasphemous to some, but I actually preferred Darling over RJ from what I remember.

Agreed. I don't expect them to talk MORE sabres than the Bills, but how about a little more balance. As others have said, they pick the top 2-3 stories about the Bills and just hammer them over and over and over, then they have guest after guest talking about the Bills (and a lot more talkign about NFL gambling). Again, how about mixing a little more Sabres talk in after a game?

One that comes to mind is Lawson Crouse in Arizona: -11th overall pick but many had him going even higher when he was drafted -His first 5 seasons, a lot of healthy scratches. 281 games played. 36 total goals (about 10 goals per 82). When he wasn't scratched was getting very low ice time. Widely considered a bust. Averaged only about 13 minutes of ice time per game played. -In season 6 (last year, I think he turned 24) the light went on. Over the past 2 seasons now...33 goals in 91 games (about 30 per 82 games). Hes now on the PP and getting top line ice time (17-19 minutes usually). An Even +/- player on a minus team. Not only does he play the PP, he is a top penalty killer and in the short list of forwards the team trusts in overtime. Maybe Sean Couturier: -8th overall pick, just like Mitts. Played his first full season at age 19. -In his first 6 years, never scored over the teens in goals, was under 40 points every year. -wasn't until his 7th year, at age 25, over 400 career games played, when he crossed 30 goals and 70 points. Mitts has only played 225 games so far, is 24 years old. Mitts career numbers per 60 are slightly better than Couturier's were through is first 6 seasons.

I am leaning Dahlin...because if I can't decide who is 'best' i try to think who is more valuable as the tie-breaker. Now I may be wrong this way, but this is how I think of it....if the Sabres were starting a 7 game playoff series and ONE of the two was going to miss the entire series, who would I want? Both would be a huge loss, but I think the Sabres could get by a bit better with Dahlin and no Tage, but if Dahlin were not there for a playoff series they would be in a bit more trouble.

Who does everyone think the Sabres best player is right now? Tage Thompson: -Currently 3rd in the league in Points, 2nd in Goals -His current year 82 game pace is for 66 goals and 60 assists (126 points) -His actual last 82 games played (going into last year) he has 57 goals, 48 assists, 105 points. -At times if he has the puck in the right place he seems unstoppable in terms of scoring goals. -Scoring both on the PP and Even strength Rasmus Dahlin: -2nd in the league in D-man scoring, but in 2 less games than the leader -Current year 82 game pace is for 28 goals, 71 assists, 99 points -Actualy last 82 games played is 20 goals, 53 assists, 73 points -over 25 minutes per game played, he is hitting, rarely makes a mistake in his own end causing a goal, and by being so good at getting the puck out of the D-zone he is setting up a lot of chances for the forwards. -Plays in all situations, in all zones, controls the game in almost every way from the back end.

I'm not sure how you would shadow a D-man...plus its not really needed. First, the best way to take away chances from an opposing D-man is to limit odd man rushes that he can join, and to play positionally sound in your own end (something you try to do all the time anyway. Plus, while he's a great player, I don't know if I want to go out of my way to shadow a guy who has scored 34 goals in his last 105 games. Good for a D-man, sure is, but not someone I want to handicap myself in other areas to stop. He gets a ton of ice time also. Not only would you have to employ that strategy with a couple different guys...you also again would be doing so to stop a guy who scores even strength .66 goals per 60 over the past 2 seasons. In terms of goals to ice time ratio, that would put him 10th on the Sabres over that time. Again, he is great, just the best way to stop him is to not make mistakes in your everyday game, not go out of you way to try something new.

The Airline industry. Over the last few years, either together or on seperate trips for work my wife and I have had 20 flights (a flight for me is a scheduled take off and landing) between us. 3 of the 20 totally canceled and the next flight was a day later. 8 more delayed more than an hour. I wish trains went more places and were more available in this country.

Thompson: 51 goals, 42 assists (93 points) in his last 82 games...if my math is correct. Sabres as a team are 35-38-9 over the last 82 games.....79 points.

Yeah, they either don't care about that or they aren't worried. I'm not a guy who gives a care about where celebs/players live or hang out, but if you are even somewhat famaliar with that neighborhood/area, its pretty easy to pinpoint their exact place based on how much they showed. You would hope that you don't have to worry about that stuff, but its unfortunate that they should keep that in mind.

Agree. I like seeing the 'behind the scenes' stuff with the players, but not much going on here. The ones I like a lot more are the 'behind the scenese' stuff with the coaches/management.

Neither. I agree with the above almost 100% I am in the crowd that thinks this team is getting better as time goes by. Quinn, Peterka, Power, even Cozens and Dahlin are going to be better next year than they are this year. A lot more players are getting better than are getting worse due to age. Patience, while many don't want to wait anymore, will make this team better. I'm not saying this team should not makes moves/trades to get better, but I don't want to force them. I don't want to trade a 1st or Rosen or Östlund unless I am getting a legit star. No way do I think Demko is at the level of being a star. Chychrun, he is closer to that level but I'm not sure what you give for him will be worth it on this team. What this team needs is someone who will be comfortable slotting in the 3rd pair and will be a GREAT #5 or #6 D-man....or a very good #3/4 guy who is OK with getting 3rd pair minutes when everyone is healthy.

I understand. Overall I agree with you that the performance of a team is generally more important than an individual stats. Its just still a bit of the "Eichel hangover" where when he was drafted many thought/were told he was going to be a top 5 scorer in the league, in the running for MVP most of the time, and carrying the team to the playoffs and deeper. Hes very good, but just not what many here had hoped.

It does? OK I guess. Not for me. I'm not saying he is bad, good, great, someone I like or you like. All I'm saying is he is not the elite scorer many wanted him to be. After all, you know what means more than him being 'arguably' the best player on a good team in the West? Years and Years of stats where he was on good teams, bad teams, awful teams, below average teams, playing full seasons, partial seasons, playing hurt, playing totally healthy...etc. I'll take my 'stats' supporting a point about where he ranks as an offensive force in the league compared to any other forward...over how good of an 'overall' player he is based on less than 30 games in one particular season.

Of course there are always exceptions to the rule..but the rule is very strong. -Last year in the East, every team that was positive made the playoffs. Every team that was negative missed -Last year in the West, 9 teams were positive, 7 of them made the playoffs. 7 teams were negative, 6 missed the playoffs. -If you go back to the last time we had a full season, 2018-2019, things are similar --Then in the East 9 teams were positive. The top 8 of those made the playoffs. All negative teams missed the playoffs. --In the west, every single positive team made the playoffs, every single negative team missed. So is it a perfect predictor? No, but if you are positive at goal differential, odds are GREAT you make the playoffs, if you are negative odds are you miss, and it is overall a good predictor of just how good a team is in the long run.

At this point I think we can with confidence say we know what Eichel is, a very good offensive player, but falling well short of Elite. -This year he is 43rd in the league in points, 31st in points per game. -Since the start of the 2020 season, he has missed too many games to even see where he ranks in total points, but in that time he is 57 in the league in points per game. -his 2 most productive seasons were 18-19 and 19-20. Just taking those seasons (his two best) and he was 16th in points per game. -Since his career started he is 25th in the league in points per game. -Even his impact on Vegas has been marginal. The season before he got there and last year until he played, they won about 69% of their games. Since he started playing even with their very very hot start this year, as of today they are winning about 73% of their games. Not much of a difference in regular season performance. He is a good player, a very good offensive player. But he is going to be someone that you expect to be about 25th in the league in points, and if he has a great year he will 'top out' in the 6-12th in the league. Good? yes. Very good? yes. But not likely someone Sabres fans (for the most part) will miss and wish he was still here compared to not making the trade.

Goal differential to me shows they are getting better. In the long run, it might be the single most predictive stat of how good a team is outside of record. The 'standings' dont' show an improvement, but goal differential sure does, and that is a team stat I like.

The Sabres have a positive goal differential, yet a losing record. From the far-away big picture it is not they are playing bad, but they might be the most incosistent team: -They are 3w 9L in 1 and 2 goal games. 10w and 5L in 3+ goal games. That is a big difference. Not only that, but no other team has a greater percentage of all of their wins happen in 3+ goal games. -I just noticed this. Hits. Sabres are the lowest BY FAR in hits. I know recording of that stat can be pretty variable and Buffalo seems to have a reputation of not having the official scorer recording many in Buffalo, but they are very low. 406 on the year is last in the league, 72 behind the 2nd worst team. Top teams are at or close to 900 (Philly, Pitt, NYR). -Blocked shots they are 2nd worst in the league. Last in hitting, 2nd last in blocked shots.....that gives a lot of material to those who big on "team toughness, sacrificing your body" crowd. Personally those things don't matter THAT much to me, but either roster contruction or play style seem to lean in that direction.

Its not just the glass half empty crowd. There truly is a middle ground called realists. And yes, to the optimist a 'realist' is looking like they ar half empty but they are not. So yes, there is a lot of hockey left. Yes, very often a team in the Sabres position this time of year DOES get really hot and does make the playoffs. Yes, it does happen and it CAN happen with the Sabres. But it is more than just '7 points out'. It is how many teams ahead of you that matters also. If you are 7 points behind one team with no one else between you, fine. But if there is a team 7 points ahead of you, one 6 points, a couple 4 or 5....then you have to pass all those teams for one spot When you are just chasing one team, you are hoping/betting on OTHER teams around the NHL to beat that one team so you can make up points. But when there are so many teams in front of you, those 'other' teams you need to beat the team 7 points ahead of you will be gaining points themself while doing so, making them harder to catch. Glass half empty..."Sabres have no shot, hole is too big." Glass half full..."they can do it, I can see a clear path to the playoffs" the truth is probably someplace in between.

I'm sure he wants to win, but I think it is mostly about money. With 31g in 70 games last year, and 20 in 28 this year, he is probably thinking...he is in the prime of his career, this is going to be his ONE big contract, hes sure he is a legit 40g scorer, and he sees younger guys getting better offers than he was given who haven't proved what he has. I think he wants a long term deal at $9-$10m per year. JT Miller just got $8m per year, and Horvat figures he is a few years younger and has scored more goals for the team over the past 2 years total. Or me might be looking at the over $9 Barzal just signed and thinking he is MUCH more productive than him.

Thinking about this after the last 2 losses.... 1.) time. Cozens, Peterka and Quinn look to be legit NHLers that will get better but it will take time. Power is an NHL player but he will get better with time. Krebs can't get much worse with time, so hopefully he'll get better too. There are more important players on this team that are young enough that they will get better with time than ones on the downside who will get worse. If this EXACT team were to be put on the ice next year, with ZERO changes, they will be a better team than they are this year. 2.) figure out the 3rd line with guys who can be productive (somewhat) with mid-level ice time (15-16 minute per game) and no PP time. Your first line is set. Your young guns like might have ups and downs but they are good. Your 4th line is good enough to do what they need to do. That 3rd line is an issue. Don't need 3 new guys, but find 1 or two so you can get maybe 40-50 goals out of it (at least) without being a defensive liability. 3.) Goaltending. UPL still might get better. Comrie hasn't had even a quarter season here non-injured. Maybe its them with no outside help. Maybe you need someone else. Find a way to get better goaltending going forward than you have in the past. 4.) I guess D-depth. Everyone (just about) wants better 3rd pair guys, but no one is willing to give up a 2nd pair guy so he can be your 'better' 3rd pair guy. So time, fix a 3rd line, and get better goaltending. That is all you need now. Don't reach for something else and overpay (money or assets), change for the sake of change is something a lot of fans want, I'd rather be patient.

Of course it applies, everyone gets tired with a larger workload in a short period of time. It may not apply as much to someone younger than older, but it applies to almost everyone. Are you trying to say that the effort/results would be the same if they Sabres were not on the back end of a home and home but Pitt was? Again, I'm not comparing Buf to Pitt in that single situation, I am talking about all situations on the end of a back to back.

Because it does apply sometime. The world isn't black and white and neither is hockey. it is a factor. It would appear to be a bigger factory if Pitt wasn't on back to backs also, but because Pitt was also doesn't mean it doesn't contribute to the effort the Sabres put forward vs if they WEREN'T on back to back.

Yes, I sure do. But you only picked out one part of what I said...if we are just talking that that ONE game, the other 2 points I make apply.

It especially hurts early in the year because Pittsburgh is one of the teams the Sabres were chasing for the last wildcard spot. Over 27-28 hours if the had won both of those games instead, they'd already only bee 4 points out of a spot and 3 behind Pittsburgh. Maybe we all got a little TOO excited about the whole team based on wins over San Jose and Columbus...both of which are currently 2 of the worst teams in the league. Those wins count of course, but since Thanksgiving, this team is only 3-5, with those 3 wins in OT vs Detroit and against the previously mentioned San Jose and Columbus. They are 'growing' but there is still a lot of work to do.