SABRES 0311

Before I jump the gun. Do we want to wait until inauguration for the Biden thread or start it early? I ask because I understand he will be making his cabinet nominations known in the near future. Figure we could talk about the first 100 days and some predictions between now and January.

WWE went downhill when HHH (Paul Levesque) took over creativity. Attitude era was the best.

Had an interesting conversation with some stranger Online. I didn’t like him but he likes Trump so naturally I went full never Trumper. Conversation got real weird. Crazy people out there.

Well, I guess that’s it. I’ll get a couple needles shoved in me. I’ll either be protected against COVID or “I Am Legend” becomes real life.

I think I’ll be getting a COVID vaccine in the near future. Two shots with a couple days off after each one.

I might be taking the easy road on this but I agree with goaltending being the biggest question. I expect GF will increase and it will help the Sabres to win a few games that in the past may have been one or two goal losses. The PP I think improves. Looking at the lineup there is more PP combination options this year which in my head means we can make it harder for other teams to adjust their PK. I’m on the fence with where to put Skinner. He played with Staal in Carolina but has had recent success with Eichel. Putting Hall with Eichel may have off ice benefits. If that scenario results in higher personal stats perhaps it entices him to resign. Then again it probably makes him more marketable in the offseason. Double edge sword or I’m overthinking it. I think we make the playoffs due to winning more games through offense. It’s a first round elimination and next offseason KA makes goaltending a priority.

So you lived Sicario.

I don’t like shots.

For anyone who lives in California. https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/11/19/state-issues-limited-stay-at-home-order-to-slow-spread-of-covid-19/

I just don’t get the idea of taking someone’s BS.

@SwampD Actually I’m not totally clear on the rules. How is it ok for one poster to attack another by accusing them of being a national problem simply because they don’t agree with a word in a post? Furthermore, other posters said the same thing but they don’t get attacked. That also makes no sense to me considering I’ve explained that in no way did I express support for or against what Trump is doing.

All I was looking for is clarification.

The issue is I said the same thing all of you did. Trump is disputing the election results. I never supported what he’s doing or even talked about Trump’s claims. I did say I am pretty sure Biden gets sworn in and people should let the courts decide because the alternative is not good. Then I get told that I am part of the problem for saying the above. That was followed with multiple posts on here about the meaning of disputing the election. I asked him multiple times to clarify how I am part of some problem and received no explanation for the accusation. Finally I told him to accept reality (election is in dispute) and get help (baseless accusations that I am part of a national problem). If someone can identify where I supported or justified what is happening let me know. Likewise if anyone can identify where and how I am a part of a national problem.

I got it. Not by choice. But still got it.

Time for you to accept reality and get help.

I have said the same thing everyone else on here said. Trump is disputing the election results and I don’t think it changes the outcome. Then I said it’s better to let this play out in the courts as opposed to people killing each other in the streets. One of my first post election posts I said I’d accept Biden as the POTUS and move on. Somehow you think that makes me a problem for the country. I don’t know if you are just messing with me, or if there is some mental/emotional issue you have, or if you are looking to make enemies. Someone up thread mentioned you are letting your feelings toward Trump get in the way. Directing those feelings toward me on the internet doesn’t change reality.

Show me where and how.

Nope you are wrong. As usual. Deal with it. Move on. Again I never supported the idea of disputing the election. I only said that a dispute exists. Read that again. Now go back, read it again slowly. Take a day, think about and read it again.

The reason I’m pretty sure Biden won and why I’m saying the results are in dispute. You seem to think it makes me a part of the problem in this country. I think I’ve done a decent job explaining what I mean. I didn’t see you call anyone else that said it’s in dispute as a part of the problem.

As usual your assessment on me is wrong.

Appreciate that. I’m saying the same thing @Curtis. I don’t think a sane person really thinks it gets overturned. I’m not sure Trump believes it gets overturned. But the fact is one side is disputing the legitimacy of the vote. Right or wrong it is a dispute.

This is what I am saying.

And I’ve said that I don’t think it gets overturned. Simply acknowledging reality and a possible outcome is not wrong. Accusing people of doing something they did not do because you refuse to understand what they are saying is wrong.

Harming America? Get a grip. All I did was acknowledge the fact the election results are in dispute by Trump and that it’s delaying the process. With any dispute the final outcome is to be determined until the dispute is over. Never did I say I agree with the dispute or perpetuate the claimed basis of the dispute. Biden has more votes. I don’t see the current results being overturned. That doesn’t mean we bury our heads and pretend that something crazy couldn’t happen. I can’t tell if you guys are screwing with me or seriously believe I am pushing something I’m not.

So Trump is not disputing the election? That dispute is not delaying the process?